目的 探索冰袋冷敷对膝关节前交叉韧带重建术后关节疼痛肿胀和活动度的影响。方法 回顾性分析自2021年1月—2021年7月在我院因前交叉韧带损伤行前交叉韧带重建术的患者资料,将符合标准的71例行单侧前交叉韧带重建术的患者按住院号的单双号分成2组。其中,对照组38名患者,试验组33名患者。对照组38名患者术后不用冰袋冷敷;试验组33名患者术后采用冰袋冷敷。用视觉模拟评分表评估对照组和试验组患者术前、术后的疼痛,并测量患者的膝关节肿胀程度和活动度。结果 对照组和试验组患者术前视觉模拟评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),试验组在术后6、24、48、72小时四个不同的时间点时疼痛视觉模拟评分均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);对照组和试验组患者术前关节活动度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),试验组在术后4、5、6、7天四个不同的时间点时关节活动度优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);对照组和试验组患者术前膝关节肿胀程度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),试验组在术后1、2、3天三个不同的时间点时膝关节肿胀程度低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论 冰袋冷敷能够有效减轻前交叉韧带重建术后膝关节疼痛肿胀并改善关节活动度。

Objective To explore the effect of ice pack cold compress on joint pain,swelling and motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods The data of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction due to anterior cruciate ligament injury in our hospital from January 2021 to July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed,and 71 patients who received unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction meeting the standards were divided into two groups according to the odd and even numbers of hospital admission. There were 38 patients in the control group and 33 patients in the experimental group. Thirty-eight patients in the control group did not use ice packs after surgery. Thirty-three patients in experimental group were treated with ice pack after operation. Visual analogue scale was used to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative pain of the control group and experimental group,and the degree of knee swelling and range of motion were measured. Results There was no significant difference in preoperative visual analogue scale between control group and experimental group (P>0.05). The scores of pain in the experimental group were significantly lower than that in the control group at 6,24,48 and 72 hours after surgery,with statistical significance (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in preoperative range of motion between control group and experimental group(P>0.05), the range of motion of the experimental group was significantly better than that of the control group at four different time points of 4,5,6 and 7 days after operation,with statistical significance(P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the degree of preoperative knee joint swelling between the control group and the experimental group(P>0.05),and the degree of knee joint swelling in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group on,1,2 and 3 days after surgery,three different time points, with statistically significant difference(P<0.001). Conclusions Ice pack cold compress can effectively reduce the pain and swelling of the knee joint after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and improve the range of motion of the joint.

目的 研究应用手机软件(Goniometer Pro,G-pro)进行测量髋关节活动度(range of motion,ROM)的测量的信度和效度。方法 用量角器和苹果手机软件G-pro来测量髋关节ROM,共有12名受试者参加本次试验。测量者A应用量角器和G-pro来测量髋关节的屈曲角度,同时测量者B应用G-pro进行再次测量髋关节屈曲角度,24 h后测量者A在相同条件下应用G-pro再次测试髋关节屈曲角度。通过分析量角器与G-pro测量结果进行效度分析,通过比较测量者A与B,测量者A前后两次测量进行组间和组内信度研究。结果 在同一测量者量角器与G-pro测量值之间无显著性差异(P >0.05),测量者A用G-pro前后24 h前后测量受试者得出的差值也无显著性差异(P>0.05),测量者A、B用G-pro测量髋关节活动度的测量值无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 G-pro对于测量髋关节屈曲具有良好的信度和效度。

Objective To study the reliability and validity of measuring hip joint range of motion(ROM) with mobile APP (Goniometer Pro,G-pro). Methods The hip joint ROM was measured with a protractor and iPhone APP (G-pro), 12 subjects participated in this trial. Tester A used a protractor and iPhone APP (G-pro) to measure the flexion angle of the hip joint. Tester B used the mobile APP to measure the hip flexion angle again. Twenty-four hours later, tester A used the mobile APP to measure the hip flexion angle again under the same conditions. The validity was evaluated by analyzing the measurement results of protractor and mobile APP. The inter group and intra group reliability was studied by comparing the two measurements of tester A and tester B, and twice measurements of tester A. Results There was no significant difference between the measurements of protractor and iPhone APP by the same tester (P＞0.05). There was no significant difference in the twice measurements of tester A using iPhone APP (P＞0.05), and there was no significant difference in measurements of tester A and tester B using iPhone APP (P＞0.05). Conclusions The iPhone APP (Goniometer Pro) has good reliability and validity in measuring hip ROM.

       目的   对比分析双极半髋关节置换术（BHA）与全髋关节置换术（THR）治疗股骨颈骨折（FNF）的效果。方法   回顾性收集北京中医药大学东直门医院洛阳医院2019年6月—2023年4月90例FNF患者临床资料，依照手术治疗方案差异分为两组，BHA组（45例）行BHA治疗，THR组（45例）行THR治疗，比较两组围术期指标、术前及术后3 d炎症因子水平、术后6个月髋关节活动度、术前及术后6个月生活质量［欧洲生活质量评分（EQ-5D评分）］。结果  THR组手术时间（108.76±15.33）min、下床活动时间（40.37±10.24）h、住院时间（19.02±5.11）d均较BHA组［（53.49±10.12）min、（25.92±7.15）h、（15.16±4.87）d］长（t分别为20.184、7.761、3.668，均P＜0.05），术中失血量（318.69±35.14）mL、术后引流量（129.74±21.03）mL均较BHA组［（224.07±29.35）mL、（90.35±17.48）mL］多（t分别为13.863、9.663，均P＜0.001）；组间并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；术后3 d，BHA组血清白细胞介素-1为（17.35±3.06）pg/L、白细胞介素-6为（24.82±4.31）pg/L、C-反应蛋白为（26.17±4.59）pg/L，低于THR组的（20.16±3.48）pg/L、（27.04±5.06）pg/L、（28.90±5.12）pg/L（t分别为4.068、2.241、2.663，均P＜0.05）；两组术后6个月髋关节内旋、屈曲、外旋、外展、内收活动度及EQ-5D评分对比差异均无统计学意义（均P＞0.05）。结论   与THR相比，BHA能减少FNF患者围术期失血量，降低术后炎症因子表达水平，缩短手术及下床活动时间，促进恢复。

      Objective  To compare and analyze the effects of bipolar hemihip replacement（BHA）and total  hip replacement（THR）in the treatment of femoral neck fracture（FNF）．Methods  The clinical data of 90 patients with FNF in the Luoyang Hospital，Dongzhimen Hospital，Beijing University of Chinese Medicine，from June 2019 to April 2023 were retrospectively collected．The patients were divided into two groups according to the difference in surgical treatment plan．The BHA group（45 cases）received BHA treatment，and the THR group（45 cases）received THR treatment．The perioperative indicators，preoperative and postoperative inflammatory factor levels，postoperative hip joint mobility at six months，preoperative and postoperative quality of life ［European Quality of Life Scale（EQ-5D score）］were compared between the two groups．Results  The operation time（108.76±15.33）min，ambulation time（40.37±10.24）h，and hospitalization time（19.02±5.11）d in the  THR  group were longer than those in the BHA group ［（53.49±10.12）min，（25.92±7.15）h，（15.16±4.87）d］（t=20.184，8.630，3.668，respectively，all P＜0.05）．The intraoperative blood loss（318.69±35.14）mL and  postoperative  drainage volume（129.74±21.03）mL were both higher than those in the BHA group ［（224.07±29.35）mL，（90.35±17.48）mL］（t=13.863，9.663，respectively，all P＜0.001）．There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the groups（P＞0.05）．Three days after surgery，the serum levels of interleukin-1，interleukin-6，and C-reactive protein in the BHA group were（17.35±3.06）pg/L，（24.82±4.31）pg/L，and（26.17±4.59）pg/L，respectively，which were lower than those in the THR group（20.16±3.48）pg/L，（27.04±5.06）pg/L，and（28.90±5.12）pg/L（t=4.068，2.241，2.663，respectively，all P＜0.05）．There was no significant difference in the range of motion of internal rotation，flexion，external rotation，abduction，and adduction of the hip joint and EQ-5D scores between the two groups at six months after surgery（all P＞0.05）．Conclusions  Compared with THR，BHA can reduce perioperative blood loss in FNF patients，reduce postoperative inflammatory factor expression level，shorten operation and ambulation time，and promote recovery．