【摘要】 目的 评价基于智慧教室的PBL教学法在肾内科临床教学中的应用效果，并探讨该模式对提升临床科室带教同质化水平的潜在价值。方法 选取2023年9月—2024年10月在江苏大学附属医院肾内科轮转的临床医学专业学生及住院医师规范化培训学员共80名为研究对象，采用区组随机化方法分为实验组和对照组，每组40名。实验组在智慧教室环境中实施PBL教学，对照组采用传统讲授法。两组课堂学时完全一致（每周2次，每次2学时，共16学时），但实验组课前预习与课后拓展为自愿完成，未对课外学习时间进行量化记录。通过理论考核、临床技能评估、模拟临床演练评估及问卷调查评价教学效果。结果 Mini-CEX评估显示，实验组在临床判断（7.65±0.78 vs 6.82±0.85，P<0.001）和沟通技能（7.80±0.72 vs 6.95±0.88，P<0.001）维度改善最为明显，均从达标水平（4~6分）跨越至优秀水平（7~9分）；临床技能考核中腹膜透析置管术成绩实验组（45.82±1.45分）高于对照组（42.15±2.03分）（t=9.24，P<0.001，Cohen's d=2.08）。实验组理论考核成绩（89.45±3.12）分高于对照组（84.23±4.56）分（t=5.89，P<0.001, Cohen's d=1.32），临床技能考核成绩（45.82±1.45）分高于对照组（42.15±2.03）分（t=9.24, P<0.001, Cohen's d=2.08）。实验组在学习动机、课堂互动性和学习效率方面自评优于对照组（P<0.05），但团队合作能力培养两组差异无统计学意义（62.5% vs 52.5%, P=0.340）。结论 该联合模式能有效促进规培生临床核心胜任力的转化，可为临床科室高仿真技能带教提供实操路径。

目的 探讨理论授课后续以问题为基础的学习（PBL）的阶梯教学法在临床技能混合教学中的效果。方法 选择福建医科大学附属南平第一医院2019级临床医学专业58名见习生为研究对象,将其通过单双号抽签的方式分为两组,即研究组与对照组各29例,研究组基于理论授课后续PBL的阶梯教学法,以“一对一”方式进行线上线下混合教学,对照组开展常规线下教学,对两组见习生教学效果进行比较。结果 研究组见习生参与消毒铺巾、气管插管、胸腔穿刺、腰椎穿刺及小儿腰椎穿刺等5项临床技能考核分别为（95.23±3.18）（95.19±3.26）（95.15±3.35）（95.28±3.17）（95.11±3.45）分,优于对照组（88.23±4.01）（87.89±4.59）（86.23±3.78）（87.22±3.89）（86.23±3.67）分（t=7.366、6.983、9.510、8.650、9.494,P<0.05）;研究组见习生综合能力提升情况优于对照组（χ²=6.444,5.497、5.497、6.444、7.733,P<0.05）;从教师培训态度（7项）、培训方法（15项）、培训时间（3项）、培训效果（11项）等方面进行评价,研究组临床技能培训教学效果各项评分及总分分别为（6.67±0.35）（12.23±2.23）（2.44±0.29）（9.23±2.56）（30.34±4.45）分,高于对照组的（4.12±1.45）（10.12±2.17）（9.23±2.56）（1.68±0.56）（7.23±2.12）分（24.34±3.45）分,（t=9.206、3.652、6.490、3.240、5.738,P<0.05）。结论 基于理论授课后续PBL的阶梯教学法,以“一对一”线上线下混合教学建立医学生临床技能的培训方法,见习生的综合能力明显提升,教学效果更好。

Objective To explore the effect of Problen-Based Learning（PBL）step-by-step teaching method in the online and offline mixed teaching of clinical skills for medical students. Methods Fifty-eight interns majoring in clinical medicine of grade 2019 in Nanping First Hospital affiliated to Fujian Medical University were selected as the research object,they were divided into two groups by drawing lots with even and odd numbers,namely,the study group and the control group,with 29 cases in each group．The study group conducted online and offline mixed teaching in a “one-on-one” way based on the step-by-step PBL teaching method after theoretical teaching,while the control group received regular offline teaching,and the teaching effects of the two groups were compared. Results The students of the study group participated in 5 clinical skills assessment,including disinfection towel（95.23±3.18）,tracheal intubation（95.19±3.26）,chest puncture（95.15±3.35）,lumbar puncture（95.28±3.17）and pediatric lumbar puncture（95.11±3.45）,were significantly better than those of control group（88.23±4.01）,（87.89±4.59）,（86.23±3.78）,（87.22±3.89）,（86.23±3.67）（t=7.366,6.983,9.510,8.650,9.494,P<0.05）．The comprehensive ability improvement of students in study group was better than that in control group（χ²=6.444,5.497,5.497,6.444,7.733,P<0.05）．The evaluation was made from the aspects of teacher training attitude（7 items）,training method（15 items）,training time（3 items）and training effect（11 items）．The clinical skill training teaching effect scores of study group（6.67±0.35）,（12.23±2.23）,（2.44±0.29）,（9.23±2.56）,（30.34±4.45）were significantly higher than those of control group（4.12±1.45）,（10.12±2.17）,（9.23±2.56）,（1.68±0.56）,（7.23±2.12）,（24.34±3.45）（t=9.206,3.652,6.490,3.240,5.738,P<0.05）. Conclusions Based on PBL step-by-step teaching method after theoretical teaching,the training method of clinical skills for medical students is established by “one-to-one” online and offline mixed teaching,can improve the clinical skills and comprehensive ability of interns and get high evaluation from students．

目的 分析本科医学生对临床技能学培训课程的满意度,探索可提高临床技能学课程的改进措施。方法 抽取2015级不同专业医学生参加临床技能学课程的学生,通过问卷调查学生对培训课程的满意度。结果 临床技能学体系改革后,学生对临床技能学课程设置和老师的满意度都很高,对课程设置非常满意有18.31%,满意有58.03%,基本满意有21.69%,不满意的只有1.41%;对老师非常满意有36.9%,满意有49.86%,基本满意有12.68%,不太满意只有0.56%。结论 临床技能学可提高学生的临床综合能力和思维能力,可以持续的开展。

Objective To Through the analysis of the satisfaction surveys of clinical skills course, we aimed to make improvements on the teaching of clinical skills course. Methods With the method of stratified sampling, we chose medical students of different majors in the grade 2015 who attended the clinical skills course, and carried out the surveys of their satisfaction on the course. Results Students were satisfied with the design and the teaching of clinical skills course after the reform of clinical skills teaching. With the design of clinical skills course, 18.31% students were very satisfied, 58.03% were satisfied, 21.69% were basically satisfied, and just 1.41% were unsatisfied; With the teachers of clinical skills, 36.9% students were very satisfied, 49.83% were satisfied, 12.68% were basically satisfied, and just 0.56% were unsatisfied. Conclusion Clinical skills course may improve students' clinical comprehensive abilities and clinical thinking. It should be carried out continuously.