《广州医药》
点击关注官方服务号追踪稿件状态

【重要服务提醒】《广州医药》杂志服务号已上线稿件查询功能

各位作者、审稿专家:
本刊官方微信服务号新增稿件状态查询服务,无需反复登录投稿系统,微信即可随时查看审稿进度、修回通知、录用结果,稿件更新实时推送提醒,同步接收期刊征稿、学术资讯。

操作方式

微信搜索关注广州医药杂志服务号 → 点击菜单栏「绑定账号」→ 输入投稿邮箱完成账号关联;请关闭微信消息免打扰,避免遗漏稿件通知。

《广州医药》编辑部

广州医药杂志服务号
论著

cTBNA与EBUS-TBNA在肺门及纵膈淋巴结肿大疾病诊断中的比较

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration EBUS-TBNA vs conventional transbronchial needle aspiration cTBNA in the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes

:22-25
 
目的 探讨传统支气管针吸活检 (cTBNA )与超声支气管镜引导下针吸活检(EBUS-TBNA)对于肺部疾病伴有肺门及纵膈淋巴结肿大患者的诊断价值。方法 2012 年8月—2014年6月对在我院行CT检查提示肺部伴有肺门和/或纵膈淋巴结病变的患者38例, 分别利用cTBNA或EBUS-TBNA检查对肿大的淋巴结行TBNA,对所获得的标本进行相应的细胞学检查。结果 38例病例均经组织病理学诊断后确诊,并经过6个月的随访,其中cTBNA组(n=19)经组织病理明确诊断的包括:1例结核,5例小细胞肺癌,6例腺癌,3例鳞癌,1例大细胞癌,3例慢性炎症,cTBNA细胞学诊断阳性诊断率为63.16%(12/19),cTBNA组细胞学诊断肺癌的敏感度为66.67%(10/15),特异度为100%。EBUS-TBNA组(n=19)组织病理学诊断明确的1例为肺结核,1例为纵隔恶性肿瘤,1例为结节病,1例大细胞癌,1例小细胞癌,7例腺癌,5例鳞癌,2例为慢性炎症,EBUS-TBNA细胞学阳性诊断率为78.94%(15/19)。两种方法在诊断肺门及纵膈淋巴结肿大的疾病中有差异(P<0.05)。EBUS-TBNA组细胞学诊断肺癌的敏感度为86.67%(13/15),特异度为100%。结论 EBUS-TBNA细胞学检查对肺部疾病伴有肺门及纵膈淋巴结肿大的诊断率较cTBNA高,可明显提高检查阳性率,具有重要临床意义。
Objective To evaluate the value of clinical application between cTBNA and EBUS-TBNA in diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Methods Between August 2012 and June 2014, 38 in-patients with mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes took conventional transbronchial needle aspiration( cTBNA,n=19) or endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration(EBUS-TBNA, n=19), and we were comparing the diagnostic results of two methods. Results 19 patients in the cTBNA group were diagnosed by forceps biopsy,including 1 case of lung cancer and 162 cases of tuberculosis, 5 cases of small cell lung cancer, 6 cases of adenocarcinoma, 3 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 1 case of large cell carcinoma, 3 cases of chronic inflammation, a cytological diagnosis of TBNA positive in 12 cases (63.16%). In the EBUS-TBNA group (n=19), the patients were diagnosed by accepting forceps biopsy, 1 case of tuberculosis, 1 case of mediastinal malignant tumor, 1 cases of sarcoidosis, 1 cases of large cell carcinoma, 1 case of small cell carcinoma, 7 cases of adenocarcinoma, 5 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 2 cases of chronic inflammation, EBUS-TBNA cytology positive rate of diagnosis was 14 (73.68%). Two techniques in the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes have statistically significant(P<0.05). The sensitinty of cytology in the diagnosis of lung caner was 86.67%(13/15),and the specificity was 100%(EBUS-TBNA). Conclusion EBUS-TBNA is an effective tool in the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes and superior to cTBNA.
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号