目的 探究孕妇血清PAPP-A、IR与妊娠期糖尿病的临床相关性。方法 以我院2013年4月—2014年4月期间收治的160例妊娠期糖尿病孕妇作为观察组,以同期收治的妊娠期正常孕妇作为对照组。对比分析两组孕妇血清PAPP-A含量与IR计算值差异。结果 观察组孕妇血清PAPP-A水平低于对照组,而IR计算值明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 孕妇血清PAPP-A与IR水平与妊娠期糖尿病相关性显著,妊娠期糖尿病患者血清PAPP-A明显降低,而IR则明显增加,可为临床诊断提供参考依据。

Objective To explore the clinical relevance of the pregnant women serum PAPP -a, IR and gestational diabetes. Methods The 160 cases of gestational diabetes mellitus were treated in our hospital from April 2013 to April 2014 as the observation group, and the normal pregnant women were treated as the control group. The differences of serum PAPP-A levels and IR values in the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The serum PAPP-A level of the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group, while the IR value was significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The level of serum PAPP-A and IR in pregnant women is significantly related to the gestational diabetes mellitus. The serum PAPP-A of the patients with gestational diabetes is significantly decreased, while the IR is significantly increased, which can provide reference for clinical diagnosis.

目的 探讨替罗非班辅助低分子肝素治疗急性冠脉综合征合并妊娠糖尿病的临床疗效及安全性。方法 前瞻性选取本院2012年4月—2015年10月收治的80例急性冠脉综合征合并妊娠糖尿病患者,按随机数字表法分为对照组、实验组,每组40例,实验组采用替罗非班辅助低分子肝素治疗,对照组使用单独低分子肝素治疗方案,比较两组治疗后血浆蛋白-A(PAPP-A)以及超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)水平;比较两组内出血情况以及血小板计数的变化。结果 两组治疗后PAPP-A以及hs-CRP水平均有所下降,实验组下降幅度高于对照组,对比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);两组内出血发生率分别为10.0%、40.0%,均无严重出血情况发生,实验组轻度出血3例,中度出血1例,对照组轻度出血10例,中度出血6例,实验组轻中度出血率低于对照组(P＜0.05);两组治疗前血小板计数对比差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),治疗后实验组血小板计数下降明显,对照组血小板计数无明显变化,两组不同时间点血小板计数差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论 替罗非班辅助低分子肝素治疗急性冠脉综合征合并妊娠糖尿病患者具有一定的效果,且用药安全性较高。

目的 对硝苯地平缓释片治疗高血压合并糖尿病的疗效分析。方法 运用随机对照的方法,选择2012年1月—2014年8月在我社区医院就诊的220例高血压合并糖尿病患者,将其分为观察组与对照组,每组各取110例,将全部患者的血糖等各项指标控制在常规范围,观察组服用硝苯地平缓释片,对照组采用常规疗法。一个疗程(8周)进行对比,检测血压、血糖项目,观测临床治疗效果。结果 服用药物后,两组血压均有降低(P<0.05),观察组临床总有效率98.18%,对照组有效率86.36%,观察组比对照组有明显的控制疗效。两组统计数据差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 硝苯地平缓释片治疗高血压合并糖尿病方面有疗效,无明显的治疗副作用,值得临床推广使用。

目的 探讨CAl99在T2DM患者与健康人群中的差异及CAl99与糖化血红蛋白(HBAlc)的相关性。方法 收集2013年1月—9月T2DM患者382例,选择同期健康体检者90例作为对照组,分别检测血清CA199与HbA1c水平,根据HbA1c水平将T2DM患者分为血糖控制组(HbA1c<7.5%),控制不佳组(HbA1C≧7.5%),T2DM患者CA199水平与对照组比较,以体重指数、空腹血糖、HbA1c等为自变量,比较各变量对CA199的影响程度。结果 T2DM患者中CA199水平高于对照组,两者比较差异有统计学意义(t=3.45,P=0.005),血糖控制不佳组CA199阳性率(21.4%)高于血糖控制组(4%),差异有统计学意义(χ²=43.33,P=0.006),HBAlc控制组(4%)与健康体检者(0.9%)无显著差异(t=0.347,P=0.254,),CA199水平与HbA1c的相关系数最高(r=0.573,P=0.004)。结论 T2DM患者CA199水平和HbA1c存在相关性, 2型糖尿病患者CAl99升高与长期血糖控制不佳有关。

Objective To explore the differences in patients with T2DM and healthy people and to explore the correlation between CA199 and HbA1c in patients with T2DM. Methods 382 patients with T2DM and 90 healthy subjects for control group were collected from January to September in 2013.The level of CA199 and HbA1c were measured by chemiluminescence method and high performance liquid chromatography assay respectively. Accordingto the level of HbA1c,patients were divided in to blood glucose controlled group(HbA1c<7.5%) and blood glucose uncontrolled group (HbA1c≧7.5%).The level of CA199 were compared with control group. Sex, age, course of disease, body mass index, fasting blood glucose and HbA1c were included as independent variables for multiple stepwise regression analysis, to compare of influences of the variables on the CA199. Results The level of CA199 in T2DM patients was significantly higher than those of healthy subjects(t=3.45, P=0.005) and the positive rate of CA199 in blood glucose uncontrolled group(21.4%) was significantly higher than those of controlled group(4.0%)(χ²=43.33,P=0.006),there is no significant difference between in blood glucose controlled group(4.0%) and healthy people group(0.9%)(t=0.347,P=0.254).Among the many variables, the level of CA199 and HbA1c correlation coefficient was the highest (r=0.573, P=0.004. Conclusion There was a close correlation between CA199 level and HbA1c.There was a correlation between the positive level of CA199 and uncontrolled blood glucose.

目的 探讨农村地区糖尿病患者在镇卫生院—村卫生站一体化管理模式下的效果。方法 于2013年10月—2014年9月对花山镇26个村1267名糖尿病患者实行镇卫生院—乡村卫生站一体化管理,镇卫生院定期组织医疗队到村卫生站健康宣教、义诊、体检,村卫生站乡医为本村糖尿病患者开展跟踪随访、血糖监测、用药及饮食运动指导。一年后比较患者的规范管理率、血糖控制率。结果 实施管理后农村糖尿病患者的规范管理率和血糖控制达标率均有提高,尤以血糖控制达标率为明显。结论 对农村社区糖尿病患者实施镇卫生院—村卫生站一体化管理能更好地跟踪监测患者血糖水平,增强患者防病意识,有效提高农村社区糖尿病患者血糖控制率。

目的 探讨血糖控制情况对胰岛素抵抗型糖尿病合并肺结核的临床治疗转归的影响。方法 选取我站收治的胰岛素抵抗型糖尿病合并肺结核的患者180例,随机分成对照组和观察组两组,每组各90例,对照组给予常规监测晨起空腹血糖和餐后2 h血糖,观察组给予监测血糖谱(包括三餐前、三餐后2 h、凌晨3点和晨起空腹血糖);观察组与对照组中患者均利用2HRSZ(E)／10HR(E)方案来进行治疗;记录两组患者治疗前后空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖、痰菌阴转情况、X线胸片病灶情况和空洞变化情况,对比分析两组的临床治疗效果。结果 观察组的痰菌阴转、X线胸片病灶、空洞变化等均比对照组的效果好,且两组差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);观察组的总体有效率87.8%(79/90)高于对照组的71.1%(64/90),两组差异有统计学意义(χ²=7.655,P=0.006)。结论 控制血糖能有效提高胰岛素抵抗型糖尿病合并肺结核的临床治疗效果,在临床上值得推广应用。

目的 探讨糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)联合超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)在筛查妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的临床意义。方法 选择2013年9月1日—2014年8月31日在我院妇产科孕期产前检查及分娩的孕妇,根据糖耐量试验(OGTT)、HbA1c和hs-CRP检查,筛查出92例孕妇为GDM组,并随机抽取OGTT正常的健康孕妇90例为NGT组,25例健康孕龄女性为对照组,分析3组FPG、HbA1c、hs-CRP及OGTT结果。结果 GDM组OGTT、HbA1c、hs-CRP高于NGT组和对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),NGT组与对照组比较,HbA1c、hs-CRP浓度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但3组FPG差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),Pearson相关分析显示,HbA1c与hs-CRP呈正相关(r=0.79,P<0.01)。结论 GDM患者HbA1c、hs-CRP水平升高,HbA1c联合hs-CRP可能成为GDM筛查的良好指标。

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of combination of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c) and high-sensitivity CRP in screening of gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM). Methods According to glucose tolerance test(OGTT),HbA1c and hs-CRP during 24~28 pregnant weeks,92 women with GDM (GDM group) and 90 normal pregnant women (NGT group) were enrolled in this study with another 25 women of child-bearing age as the control group. The results of FBG, OGTT, HbA1c and hs-CRP among three groups were analyzed. Results OGTT, HbA1c and hs-CRP level in GDM group were higher than that in NGT group and control group (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences of the level of FPG of 3 groups(P>0.05).Compare with NGT group and control group, There were no significant differences of the level of HbA1c and hs-CRP(P>0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that HbA1c had significant association with hs-CRP(r=0.79, P<0.01). Conclusion HbA1c and hs-CRP level in GDM group were increased, HbA1c combined with hs-CRP could be of some value in screening of GDM.

目的 探讨社区护理干预指导在糖尿病中的临床护理效果。方法 采取回顾分析法对我市3个街道的居民资料,选取其中有分析价值的100例糖尿病患者资料进行临床分析,根据不同护理方法将患者分为对照组和观察组,对照组实施常规护理,观察组进行社区护理干预指导,比较两组护理效果。结果 实验组体重指数为(22.9±2.48)kg/m²、FBG指标为(7.24±1.68)mmol/L、2hBG指标为(9.72±2.14)mmol/L、HbALc指标为(7.26±1.08)%,低于对照组(P<0.05);实验组96%合理饮食、98%生活具有规律性,92%患者能够定期运动,94%患者能够自我监测病情,高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 对社区糖尿病患者进行护理指导时,常识性问题、危险性因素、并发症预防问题认识不足是护理督促的要点。因此应提升社区糖尿病患者的自我管理能力,对糖尿病患者进行心理护理、饮食治疗、运动养生、定期服药等方面的进行护理干预,提高社区居民的预防意识和督促指导。

Objective To investigate the guidance of community nursing intervention in diabetes clinical care effect. Methods A retrospective analysis of the city's three neighborhood offices resident data to be analyzed, select one of the analytical value of 100 patients with diabetes clinical data analysis, according to the different methods of care patients were divided into a control group and observation group.Control implementation of routine care group, observation group of community nursing intervention guidance, care and effect between the two groups. Results Body mass index in the experimental group (22.9±2.48) kg/m², FBG indicators (7.24±1.68) mmol/L, 2hBG indicators (9.72±2.14) mmol/L, HbALc indicators (7.26±1.08)%, significantly were lower than the control group (P<0.05); the experimental group, 96% of a reasonable diet, 98% had a regular life, 92% of patients can do exercise regularly, 94% of patients were able to self-monitoring disease.It was significantly higher (P<0.05). Conclusion Diabetic patients in community care and guidance, common sense, risk factors, lack of awareness of the issue of prevention of complications is the point of care supervise, and also one of the main problems exist. It should enhance self-management of diabetes, psychological care, diet therapy, exercise regimen, regular medication and other aspects of nursing intervention guidance. It should be increasing community awareness of prevention, improve supervision and guidance role.

目的 评价自我管理小组干预对社区2型糖尿病患者的管理效果。方法 在2013年底选取本区社区卫生服务中心100例患者研究,运用自身对照方法,管理1年后对其自我管理效能、生化指标、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白进行比较。结果 管理一年后饮食控制、运动控制、药物依从性、监测依从性、足部护理等指标差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白、总胆固醇、尿酸下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。空腹血糖达标率由12%上升到37%,糖化血红蛋白达标率由10%上升到34%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 自我管理小组干预提高了社区2型糖尿病患者自我管理水平,改善了主要的生化指标,值得社区推广应用。

Objective To evaluate the function of self-management group program on patients with type 2 diabetes in community. Methods Self-management was carried out for one year among 100 patients with type 2 diabetes, the effect of management was analyzed. Results There was statistically significant difference in diet control, motion control, drug compliance, monitoring compliance, and foot care after one year intervention (P<0.05). GLU, HbA1c, CHOL, UA were decreased. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Self-management of group intervention is effective in patients with type 2 diabetes, is worthy of further popularization and application.

目的 探讨2型糖尿病患者发生医院感染危险因素。方法 收集2010年1月—2015年1月我院收治890例2型糖尿病患者临床资料行回顾性分析,根据是否发生医院感染分为感染组(75例)和非感染组(815例),对两组患者相关因素进行分析。结果 2型糖尿病医院感染发生率为8.43%,好发于呼吸系统感染。年龄、病程、住院时间、血糖控制差、侵袭性操作、合并并发症、合并基础疾病为2型糖尿病患者发生感染的危险因素。结论 2型糖尿病患者发生医院感染危险因素较多,临床针对高危患者应重点进行预防,降低感染率,提高患者治疗效果。