优质护理对消化性溃疡患者的疗效及护理满意度影响分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2016.06.020

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究并分析优质护理对消化性溃疡患者的临床疗效以及护理满意度的影响。方法入选2014年8月—2015年10月收治的184例消化性溃疡患者作为研究对象, 根据电脑随机数字将患者随机分为研究组和对照组,各92例。对照组男50例,女42例,年龄18～60 a,平均年龄(43.7±2.1)a,病程2～10 a,平均(5.2±0.4)a,研究组男48例,女44例,年龄20～59 a,平均(42.3±3.6)a,病程2～10 a,平均(5.2±0.4)a。患者入院后均给予消化性溃疡常规基础治疗(四联疗法),在此基础上给予对照组患者常规护理,研究组患者优质护理,对比两组患者的临床疗效和护理满意度。结果经研究观察对比,研究组消化性溃疡患者的临床疗效明显优于对照组,研究组消化性溃疡患者的总有效率为95.65%,对照组为79.35%,两组数据对比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。研究组患者治疗后烧心、上腹痛、嗳气等症状减轻明显较对照组显著,所需时间更短,胃镜检查显示研究组患者经优质护理处理后溃疡愈合时间明显缩短,愈合明显优于对照组,上述对比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。研究组护理满意度为96.74%,对照组护理满意度仅83.69%,研究组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论优质护理能够明显缩短溃疡愈合时间,促进患者痊愈,提高消化性溃疡患者的疗效和护理满意度,值得临床推广和应用。

关键词: 优质护理, 消化性溃疡, 疗效, 护理满意度, 总有效率

Abstract: Objective To study and analyze the effect of high quality nursing on curative effect of patients with peptic ulcer and nursing satisfaction. Methods 98 cases of peptic ulcer patients income for treatment from August 2014 to October 2015 were selected as study subjects. The patients were randomly divided into study group and control group, 49 cases in each group. The control group included male 28 case,female 21 case,aged 18～60 years old, average age (43.7±2.1) years, disease duration of(2～10)years, average(5.2±0.4) years.Study group included male 24 cases, female 25 cases, aged 20～59 years old, average age (42.3±3.6) years, disease duration of (2～10) years, average (5.2±0.4) years. After the patient was admitted to hospital, they were treated with digestive ulcer routine treatment (quadruple therapy). On this basis,patients in the control group were given routine nursing care, the study group patients with high quality nursing, compared with the two groups of patients with clinical efficacy and nursing satisfaction. Results Study group patients with peptic ulcer clinical, curative effect was obviously superior to the control group. The study group patients with peptic ulcer, total efficiency was 95.91%, It was 79.59% in the control group, the difference between the data of two groupshad statistical significance (P<0.05). Study group nursing satisfaction was 97.96%, the control group was only81.63%. The study group was significantly higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Quality care may significantly shorten the average length of stay in patients, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion High quality nursing may significantly shorten the average length of stay in patients with peptic ulcer, improve the curative effect of peptic ulcer patients and nursing satisfaction. It is worthy of clinical popularization and application.

Key words: High quality nursing, Peptic ulcer, Curative effect, Nursing satisfaction, Total effective rate

李燕君, 杨小霞. 优质护理对消化性溃疡患者的疗效及护理满意度影响分析[J]. 广州医药, 2016, 47(6): 59-61.

Li Yanjun, Yang Xiaoxia. Effect of high quality nursing on curative effect of patients with peptic ulcer and nursing satisfaction[J]. Guangzhou Medical Journal, 2016, 47(6): 59-61.

参考文献

[1] 林君玲.护理干预对消化性溃疡患者的临床效果分析[J]. 中国伤残医学,2016,24(4):168-169.
[2] 白芸,丁惠芬.新型护理干预模式对提高消化性溃疡患者疗效和满意度的效果评价[J]. 医学信息,2015,28(41):207-207.
[3] 赵晓云,石艳艳.强化护理干预在提高消化性溃疡患者护理质量及护理满意度中的作用[J]. 检验医学与临床,2015,12(13):1964-1965.
[4] 高丽江.优质护理服务在消化性溃疡患者中的应用效果分析[J]. 临床合理用药杂志,2012,05(25):100-101.
[5] 宁晓梅,马俊,路海云,等.优质护理服务示范工程在消化性溃疡患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志,2013,19(7):11-13.
[6] 曹小曼.优质护理干预对消化性溃疡患者治疗依从性及临床疗效的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2016,35(4):498-500.
[7] 吴利凤.优质护理在消化性溃疡中的应用效果观察[J]. 中国医药指南,2014,12(33):313-314,317.
[8] 蔡燕玉.优质护理干预对消化性溃疡的辅助治疗作用[J]. 按摩与康复医学,2015,6(22):105-106.
[9] 张爱霞,陆风芹,王瑞春,等.食疗联合运动疗法对消化性溃疡患者生活质量及护理满意度的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志,2014,33(7):1584-1587.
[10] 郝琳.临床护理路径对消化性溃疡患者的实施效果观察[J]. 基层医学论坛,2015,19(29):4138-4140.
[11] 田荷花,田海玲.68例消化性溃疡病人的护理[J]. 大家健康(中旬版),2015,9(3):216-216.
[12] 董艳其,段莹,胡珊,等.中医护理用于消化性溃疡患者护理效果与满意度评价[J]. 大家健康(下旬版),2014,8(20):49-50.
[13] KIM BW. Diagnosis and treatment of peptic ulcer disease: present and future perspective[J]. Korean J Gastroenterol, 2016, 67(6):318-320.
[14] YOUN YH,PARK YJ,KIM JH,et al. Weekend and night-time effect on the prognosis of peptic ulcer bleeding[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2012,18(27):3578-3584.
[15] GU C,HE GP.Treatment compliance and health needs of rural patients with peptic ulcer[J]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 2006, 31(6): 960-961.