广州医药 ›› 2021, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (2): 105-107.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2021.02.024

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

避孕药结合宫腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜息肉的临床疗效与安全性分析

邹缄   

  1. 广州市白云区妇幼保健院
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-11 出版日期:2021-03-20 发布日期:2021-11-25

Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of contraceptives combined with hysteroscopic surgery in the treatment of endometrial polyps

ZOU Jian   

  1. Baiyun District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Guangzhou 510400, China
  • Received:2020-10-11 Online:2021-03-20 Published:2021-11-25

摘要: 目的 探究宫腔镜结合避孕药治疗子宫内膜息肉的临床疗效与对其安全性的分析。方法 随机选取2016年2月—2017年12月内160例子宫内膜息肉患者,分为对照组(80例,宫腔镜治疗)和观察组(80例,宫腔镜结合屈螺酮炔雌醇片治疗),对比两组临床疗效及不良反应的差异性。结果 与对照组相比,观察组患者月经改善效果更佳,其复发率更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在不良反应的对比中,观察组结果与对照组结果相比较,不存在较大差异(P>0.05)。结论 宫腔镜结合避孕药治疗子宫内膜息肉取得了一定的临床疗效,不良反应并不显著,可推广运用。

关键词: 避孕药, 宫腔镜手术, 子宫内膜息肉, 临床疗效, 安全性分析

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of hysteroscopy combined with contraceptives in the treatment of endometrial polyps. Methods From February 2016 to December 2017, 160 patients with endometrial polyps were randomly selected and divided into control group (80 cases treated by hysteroscopy) and observation group (80 cases treated by hysteroscopy combined with drospirenone and ethinyl estradiol tablets). The differences of clinical efficacy and adverse reactions between the two groups were compared. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group had better menstruation improvement effect and lower recurrence rate. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the comparison of adverse reactions, there was no significant difference between the observation group and the control group (P>0.05). Conclusion Hysteroscopy combined with contraceptives has achieved certain clinical efficacy in the treatment of endometrial polyps, and the adverse reactions are not significant, which can be popularized and applied.

Key words: Contraceptives, Hysteroscopic surgery, Endometrial polyps, Clinical efficacy, Security analysis