广州医药 ›› 2021, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 72-75.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2021.06.015

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

口腔种植修复和常规修复在牙列缺损治疗中的有效性分析

梁长征, 陈朝兴, 黎卓, 梁聚兴   

  1. 肇庆医学高等专科学校附属医院口腔诊疗中心 (肇庆 526000)
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-09 出版日期:2021-11-20 发布日期:2021-11-26

Efficacy analysis of dentition defects treated with dental implant and conventional repair

LIANG Changzheng, CHEN Chaoxing, LI Zhuo, LIANG Juxing   

  1. Stomatological Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Affiliated Hospital of Zhaoqing Medical College,Zhaoqing 526000,China
  • Received:2021-04-09 Online:2021-11-20 Published:2021-11-26

摘要: 目的 分析口腔种植修复和常规修复在牙列缺损治疗中的有效性。方法 选定本院2019年1月—2020年12月接诊的120例牙列缺损患者,根据修复治疗方法的不同分组,参照组60例患者采取常规修复治疗,实验组60例患者采取口腔种植修复,比较两组临床疗效、龈沟炎症因子水平、并发症发生率、满意度评分。结果 实验组临床总有效率(96.67%)高于参照组(78.33%),实验组治疗后龈沟TNF-α、IL-8、IL-6因子均低于参照组,实验组并发症发生率(1.67%)低于参照组(13.33%),实验组患者满意度评分均高于参照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 口腔种植修复可有效改善牙列缺损患者语言、咀嚼功能,减轻龈沟炎症反应,减少并发症,提高患者满意度。

关键词: 口腔种植修复, 常规修复, 牙列缺损, 临床疗效, 安全性

Abstract: Objective To analyze the efficacy of dental implant and conventional repair in the treatment of dentition defects. Methods A total of 120 patients with dentition defects in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were selected and divided into two groups according to different treatment methods. Sixty patients in the control group were treated with conventional repair, and 60 patients in the experimental group were treated with dental implant repair. The clinical efficacy, gingival crevicular inflammatory factors level, complication incidence and satisfaction score of the two groups were compared. Results The clinical efficacy of the experimental group (96.67%) was higher than that of the control group (78.33%), the levels of TNF-α, IL-8 and IL-6 in the gingival sulcus of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group after treatment, the complications incidence of the experimental group (1.67%) was lower than that of the control group (13.33%), and the satisfaction score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Dental implant repair could effectively improve the language and chewing function of patients with dentition defects, reduce gingival crevicular inflammatory reaction, complications and improve patients' satisfaction.

Key words: dental implant repair, conventional repair, dentition defects, clinical efficacy, safety