托烷司琼预处理配合丙泊酚全身麻醉对预防PONV的价值

来源期刊：广州医药 | 146-150 发布时间：2024-03-06 收稿时间：2025/11/13 18:50:54 阅读量：23

作者：: 周辉,

徐振锋,

关键词：: 腹腔镜手术全身麻醉托烷司琼术后恶心呕吐麻醉效果; laparoscopy general anesthesia tropisetron postoperative nausea and vomiting anesthetic effect

DOI：: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2024.02.008

收稿时间：: 2023-07-25
修订日期：
接收日期：
引用总数：: 6

目的观察托烷司琼预处理配合丙泊酚全身麻醉对预防术后恶心呕吐（PONV）的应用价值。方法采用前瞻性研究,纳入融通集团信阳154医院在2021年6月—2022年12月期间收治的接受腹腔镜手术治疗的122例患者,所有患者均实施含丙泊酚的全身麻醉辅助手术,采用随机数字表法对入组患者进行分组,分别列为预处理组（61例）和常规组（61例）,常规组术后予以常规止吐,预处理组采用托烷司琼预处理,比较两组患者术后6 h、术后12 h、术后24 h及术后48 h等不同时间点的PONV发生率、呕吐症状改善情况,麻醉苏醒后的疼痛、镇静情况,以及术后48 h内的麻醉相关不良反应发生情况。结果预处理组术后6 h的PONV发生率为3.28%（2/61）,术后12 h的PONV发生率为4.92%（3/61）,术后24 h的PONV发生率为3.28%（2/61）,术后48 h的PONV发生率为0.00%（0/61）,均低于常规组[16.39%（10/61）、18.03%（11/61）、16.39%（10/61）、13.11%（8/61）],差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。预处理组术后6 h的恶心呕吐干呕症状评估量表（INVR）评分为（20.15±5.41）分,术后12 h的INVR评分为（17.66±4.42）分,术后24 h的INVR评分为（13.29±4.17）分,术后48 h的INVR评分为（10.22±3.35）分,均低于常规组[（23.32±5.13）分、（20.12±4.35）分、（16.33±4.24）分、（12.75±3.06）分],差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。预处理组苏醒后的视觉模拟疼痛量表（VAS）评分为（4.04±1.06）分,Ramsay镇静评分为（3.11±0.25）分,与常规组[（3.87±0.25）分、（3.06±0.35）分]比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。术后48 h内,预处理组的麻醉相关不良反应发生率为9.84%（6/61）,与常规组8.20%（5/61）比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论托烷司琼预处理辅助含丙泊酚腔镜全身麻醉腹手术可有效降低PONV发生风险并改善患者PONV相关症状,联合应用此药未对麻醉镇静、镇痛效果产生明显影响,且未明显增加术后麻醉相关不良反应发生风险,安全性较高。

Objective To observe the application value of tropisetron preconditioning combined with propofol general anesthesia in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting（PONV）．Methods This is a prospective cohort study．The patients were included from June 2021 to December 2022．The subjects of the study were 122 patients who received laparoscopy．All patients received general anesthesia assisted surgery containing propofol．The enrolled patients were divided into preconditioning group（61 cases）and conventional group（61 cases）by random number table．The conventional group was given routine antiemesis after surgery,and the preconditioning group was given tropisetron preconditioning．The incidence of PONV,improvement of vomiting symptoms,pain and sedation after anesthesia awakening,and occurrence of anesthesia related adverse reactions within 48 hours after surgery were compared between two groups of patients at different time points,including 6 hours,12 hours,24 hours,and 48 hours after surgery．Results Under different treatment regimens,the PONV incidence rates in the preconditioning group were 3.28%（2/61）after 6 hours,4.92%（3/61）after 12 hours,3.28%（2/61）after 24 hours,and 0.00%（0/61）after 48 hours．Compared with the conventional group [16.39%（10/61）,18.03%（11/61）,16.39%（10/61）,and 13.11%（8/61）],the incidence rates were lower（P<0.05）．The preconditioning group had an Index of Nausea and Vomiting and Retching（INVR）score of（20.15±5.41）points after 6 hours,（17.66±4.42）points after 12 hours,（13.29±4.17）points after 24 hours,and（10.22±3.35）points after 48 hours．Compared with（23.32±5.13）points,（20.12±4.35）points,（16.33±4.24）points,and（12.75±3.06）points）of the preconditioning group ,the INVR score at each time point was lower（P<0.05）．Under different treatment regimens,the VAS score of the preconditioning group after awakening was（4.04±1.06）points,and the Ramsay score was（3.11±0.25）points,which was similar to the conventional group [（3.87±0.25）points,（3.06±0.35）points]（P>0.05）．Within 48 hours after surgery,the incidence of anesthesia related adverse reactions in the preconditioning group was 9.84%（6/61）,which was similar to 8.20%（5/61）in the conventional group（P>0.05）．Conclusions Tropisetron preconditioning assisted laparoscopy under general anesthesia with propofol can effectively reduce the risk of PONV and improve the PONV related symptoms of patients．The combined use of this drug has no significant impact on the sedation and analgesia effects of anesthesia,and does not significantly increase the risk of postoperative anesthesia related adverse reactions,with high safety．

1、 WANG R,SONG X,CHEN Y,et al.Comparison of ondansetron and tropisetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting:A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Saudi Med J,2021,42(7):707-713.

2、陆敏,骆喜宝,张旭,等.穴位贴敷法联合托烷司琼对全身麻醉术后恶心呕吐的影响[J].中外医学研究,2022,20(18):39-42.

3、唐慕菲,沈芸竹,张保国.CYP2D6基因多态性对托烷司琼预防化疗所致恶心呕吐效果的影响[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2020,25(7):817-822.

4、 YANG Y,ZHANG L.A narrative review of tropisetron and palonosetron for the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting[J].Chin Clin Oncol,2020,9(2):17.

5、陈元,刘怀民,方勇.四种5-羟色胺3受体拮抗剂防治化疗所致恶心呕吐的安全性[J].医药导报,2021,40(10):1371-1376.

6、罗莹嘉,卓银芳,刘婷,等.穴位贴敷对妇科全麻腹腔镜手术后恶心呕吐的影响分析[J].中国实用医药,2022,17(21):181-183.

7、 LIU Q,ZHOU C,BAO Z,et al.Effects of palonosetron and ondansetron on preventing nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery[J].J Int Med Res,2018,46(1):411-420.

8、 NAEMI A R,KASHANITABAR V,KAMALI A,et al.Comparison of the effects of haloperidol,metoclopramide,dexmedetomidine and ginger on postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].J Med Life,2020,13(2):206-210.

9、杨荣耀. 瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉对老年腹腔镜手术患者的应用效果及安全性评价[J].数理医药学杂志,2022,35(9):1332-1335.

10、严冰,陈晓文,严聪,等.基于快速康复理念下腹腔镜胆囊切除手术患者的麻醉管理研究[J].临床医药实践,2021,30(1):20-22.

11、 RASHEED A M,AMIRAH M F,ABDALLAH M,et al.Ramsay sedation scale and richmond agitation sedation scale:a cross-sectional study[J].Dimens Crit Care Nurs,2019,38(2):90-95.

12、 SUNG Y T,WU J S.The visual analogue scale for rating,ranking and paired-comparison(VAS-RRP):A new technique for psychological measurement[J].Behav Res Methods,2018,50(4):1694-1715.

13、廖梅,简敏,彭文丽.穴位贴敷配合穴位按摩预防肿瘤患者化疗后恶心呕吐的效果观察[J].华夏医学,2023,3(65):144-148.

14、党晓卫,李路豪.重视外科手术适应证的选择与把控[J].国际外科学杂志,2022,49(1):1-4.

15、 KNUF K M,MANOHAR C M,CUMMINGS A K.Addressing inter-rater variability in the ASA-PS classification system[J].Mil Med,2020,185(5-6):e545-e549.

16、吕鸿波,陈祖萍.小剂量托烷司琼、氟哌利多、甲氧氯普胺及甲泼尼龙联合用药预防术后静脉镇痛恶心呕吐的临床效果[J].临床医学研究与实践,2022,7(9):98-100.

17、 YAYLA A,ESKICI ? V,KILINC T,et al.Nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy:analysis of predictive factors[J].J Perianesth Nurs,2022,37(6):834-841.

18、黄平平,高丽,谭洁.腹腔镜肝胆手术后恶心呕吐的影响因素分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2021,26(5):352-355.

19、吴波,陈俊冉,梁勇.对比分析静吸复合麻醉与全凭静脉麻醉在老年腹腔镜手术患者麻醉效果及安全性[J].贵州医药,2021,45(10):1599-1600.

20、祁凤灵,范隆,王天龙,等.伤害敏感指数在全身麻醉老年患者镇静镇痛监测的应用研究[J].北京医学,2021,43(7):682-684.

21、陈雪迎,陈权.全麻腹腔镜手术对老年腹部手术患者血流动力学、镇静效果及认知功能的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2022,51(10):1235-1239.

1、王从夺,周爽,刘绍荣,等. 瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中镇静效果的比较分析:一项随机对照试验[J]. 首都食品与医药,2024,31(17):67-69. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8257.2024.17.025.

2、陈灵儿. 艾司氯氨酮对妇科腹腔镜手术患者术后恶心呕吐及术后谵妄的影响[D]. 江苏:南通大学,2024.

3、魏颖,杨学伟,王志君,等.右美托咪定联合丙泊酚或依托咪酯对颅内动脉瘤介入术患者围插管期血流动力学的影响[J].广州医药,2024,55(09):1043-1048.

4、黄雪黎,李沂锚,王潼鑫,等.温胆汤联合托烷司琼在股骨粗隆间骨折股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定术后的应用效果[J].中国当代医药,2025,32(01):90-94.