您的位置: 首页 > 2020年9月 第51卷 第5期 > 文字全文
2023年7月 第38卷 第7期11
目录

镇痛活络酊和外用非甾体抗炎药治疗肱骨外上髁炎的短期疗效对比研究

Short-term effects comparison between analgesic tincture and topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis

来源期刊: 广州医药 | 123-129 发布时间:2021-11-28 收稿时间:2025/11/13 17:41:22 阅读量:26
作者:
关键词:
肱骨外上髁炎镇痛活络酊非甾体类抗炎药
Lateral epicondylitisAnalgesic tinctureNSAIDs
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2020.05.029
收稿时间:
2020-03-02 
修订日期:
 
接收日期:
 
引用总数:
0  
目的 对比中成药镇痛活络酊和非甾体抗炎药(Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs,NSAIDs)治疗肱骨外上髁炎(lateral epicondylitis,LE)的短期临床疗效差异。方法 筛选后符合纳入标准的LE患者60例,随机分为镇痛活络酊组(n=30)和NSAIDs组(n=30)。镇痛活络酊组外用镇痛活络酊,NSAIDs组外用法斯通凝胶(酮洛芬),两组均连续用药3周,3次/d。用药后3 周、6 周和12 周连续随访,主要观测指标包括视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS);肩、肘和手的功能评分(Disabilities of the arm, Shoulder And Hand,DASH);无痛握力(Pain-free grip strength,PFGS)。VAS评分分别测量患者1周前用力活动时的VAS评分和正常休息时的VAS评分,记为VAS(活动时)和VAS(休息时)。运用统计学方法对比分析两组患者在VAS评分(活动时)、VAS评分(休息时)、DASH评分和PFGS上的差异。结果 两组患者在VAS评分(活动时)、VAS评分(休息时)和DASH评分上均未见组间差异(P>0.05)。两组患者在用药前、用药后3周、用药后6周的PGFS对比同样无组间差异(P=0.91,P=0.42,P=0.13)。但是,在用药后12周,镇痛活络酊组的PFGS高于NSAIDs组(P=0.02)。结论 镇痛活络酊缓解LE疼痛的效果与外用NSAIDs相当,对提升伸肌力效果则更优。
Objective To compare the short-term clinical effects difference between analgesic tincture and topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis (LE). Methods 60 cases of LE patients were randomly divided into an analgesic tincture group (n=30) and a NSAIDs group (n=30). Analgesic tincture was chosen for the analgesic tincture group and topical ketoprofen gel for the NSAIDs group to treat LE. Two groups were treated continuously for 3w, 3 times/day. Clinical results of each drug were followed-up at the time point of 3w, 6w and 12w after usage. Observational indexes included the visual analogue scale (VAS), disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH) and pain-free grip strength (PFGS). The inter-group difference of VAS (at activity), VAS (at rest), DASH score and PFGS were compared subsequently. Results No difference of the VAS (at activity), VAS (at rest), DASH score were ascertained (P> 0.05) between groups. Inter-group difference of PGFS was also not discerned at the time points of pre-treatment and 3 weeks and 6 weeks (P=0.91, P=0.42, P=0.13) post-treatment. However, PFGS of the analgesic tincture group was found to be higher than that of the NSAIDs group (P=0.02) after 12 weeks post-treatment. Conclusion Effect of analgesic tincture in releasing pain is almost the same to that of tropical NSAIDs, but a better effect in improving muscle strength.
1、 BURNHAM R, GREGG R, HEALY P, et al. The effectiveness of topical diclofenac for lateral epicondylitis[J]. Clin J Sport Med, 1998,8(2):78-81. BURNHAM R, GREGG R, HEALY P, et al. The effectiveness of topical diclofenac for lateral epicondylitis[J]. Clin J Sport Med, 1998,8(2):78-81.
2、 ORCHARD J, KOUNTOURIS A. The management of tennis elbow[J]. BMJ,2011(342):d2687. ORCHARD J, KOUNTOURIS A. The management of tennis elbow[J]. BMJ,2011(342):d2687.
3、 AICALE R, TARANTINO D, MAFFULLI N. Overuse injuries in sport: a comprehensive overview[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2018,13(1):309. AICALE R, TARANTINO D, MAFFULLI N. Overuse injuries in sport: a comprehensive overview[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2018,13(1):309.
4、 SIMS S E, MILLER K, ELFAR J C, et al. Non-surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Hand (N Y), 2014,9(4):419-446. SIMS S E, MILLER K, ELFAR J C, et al. Non-surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Hand (N Y), 2014,9(4):419-446.
5、 TESTA G, VESCIO A, PEREZ S, et al. Functional outcome at short and middle term of the extracorporeal shockwave therapy treatment in lateral epicondylitis: a case-series study[J]. J Clin Med, 2020,9(3):633. TESTA G, VESCIO A, PEREZ S, et al. Functional outcome at short and middle term of the extracorporeal shockwave therapy treatment in lateral epicondylitis: a case-series study[J]. J Clin Med, 2020,9(3):633.
6、 CLARK T, MCRAE S, LEITER J, et al. Arthroscopic versus open lateral release for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Arthroscopy, 2018,34(12):3177-3184. CLARK T, MCRAE S, LEITER J, et al. Arthroscopic versus open lateral release for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Arthroscopy, 2018,34(12):3177-3184.
7、 KUCUKSEN S, YILMAZ H, SALLI A, et al. Muscle energy technique versus corticosteroid injection for management of chronic lateral epicondylitis: randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2013,94(11):2068-2074. KUCUKSEN S, YILMAZ H, SALLI A, et al. Muscle energy technique versus corticosteroid injection for management of chronic lateral epicondylitis: randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2013,94(11):2068-2074.
8、 李翠林, 李燕, 张小梅. 正清风痛宁透皮给药配合镇痛活络酊特定电磁波照射用于颈肩腰腿痛疗效比较[J]. 云南医药, 2013,34(3):241-242. 李翠林, 李燕, 张小梅. 正清风痛宁透皮给药配合镇痛活络酊特定电磁波照射用于颈肩腰腿痛疗效比较[J]. 云南医药, 2013,34(3):241-242.
9、 毕佳琦, 李荣刚, 高君, 等. 镇痛活络酊联合玻璃酸钠治疗双膝骨性关节炎的疗效观察[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2015,23(10):24-26. 毕佳琦, 李荣刚, 高君, 等. 镇痛活络酊联合玻璃酸钠治疗双膝骨性关节炎的疗效观察[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2015,23(10):24-26.
10、 杨生安. 圣手镇痛活络酊治疗颈肩腰腿痛疗效观察[J]. 人民军医, 2012,55(12):1216-1217. 杨生安. 圣手镇痛活络酊治疗颈肩腰腿痛疗效观察[J]. 人民军医, 2012,55(12):1216-1217.
11、 李霞, 徐永清. 圣手镇痛活络酊治疗膝关节骨性关节炎疗效观察[J]. 西南国防医药, 2015,25(4):407-409. 李霞, 徐永清. 圣手镇痛活络酊治疗膝关节骨性关节炎疗效观察[J]. 西南国防医药, 2015,25(4):407-409.
12、 SPACCA G, CACCHIO A, FORGACS A, et al. Analgesic efficacy of a lecithin-vehiculated diclofenac epolamine gel in shoulder periarthritis and lateral epicondylitis: a placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial[J]. Drugs Exp Clin Res, 2005,31(4):147-154. SPACCA G, CACCHIO A, FORGACS A, et al. Analgesic efficacy of a lecithin-vehiculated diclofenac epolamine gel in shoulder periarthritis and lateral epicondylitis: a placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial[J]. Drugs Exp Clin Res, 2005,31(4):147-154.
13、 AMAR E, CHECHIK O, KHASHAN M, et al. Lateral epicondylitis treatment: international survey of surgeons' preferences and literature review[J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2014,68(11):1383-1387. AMAR E, CHECHIK O, KHASHAN M, et al. Lateral epicondylitis treatment: international survey of surgeons' preferences and literature review[J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2014,68(11):1383-1387.
14、 LENOIR H, MARES O, CARLIER Y. Management of lateral epicondylitis[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2019,105(8S):S241-S246. LENOIR H, MARES O, CARLIER Y. Management of lateral epicondylitis[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2019,105(8S):S241-S246.
15、 DUNCAN J, DUNCAN R, BANSAL S, et al. Lateral epicondylitis: the condition and current management strategies[J]. Br J Hosp Med (Lond), 2019,80(11):647-651. DUNCAN J, DUNCAN R, BANSAL S, et al. Lateral epicondylitis: the condition and current management strategies[J]. Br J Hosp Med (Lond), 2019,80(11):647-651.
上一篇
下一篇
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号
目录