Objective To evaluate the advantage of the COOK double balloon catheter and Propess induced labor. Methods We collected 388 cases with pregnant women. The patients were divided into the research and control groups. The research group applied COOK double balloon catheter while the control group applies Propess. According to cervical Bishop rating, the research team was divided into research group 1 and research group 2. The control group was divided into control group 1 and the control group 2. The cervical Bishop score of the research group 1 and control group 1 was less than or equals 3 points. The cervical Bishop score of the research group 2 and the control group 2 was greater than 3 and less than or equal 6 points. We separately compared the pregnancy outcome for each group to promote cervical mature and induced labor situation. Results The cervical Bishop scores have significant difference before and after COOK cervical double balloon and Propess are positioned between two groups.The effect of low cervical Bishop scores group is better than the high cervical Bishop by propess. The rates of urgent production, postpartum hemorrhage and amniotic fluid pollution reduce significant in the research group. The neonatal asphyxia rate, incidence of temperature > 37.5, vaginal delivery cases and cesarean section cases have not significant differences between the research group and the control group. Conclusion We suggest that patients whose cervical condition is poor should choose Propess induced cervical mature; The COOK double balloon catheter induced labor is safe and has a high success rate.