目的 修订肺癌患者联合药物治疗间歇期症状评估问卷，并评价其信效度。方法 以中文版安德森症状评估量表及肺癌特异性模块为基础，经文献分析、专家会议和认知性访谈形成测试版问卷。于2023年10-12月便利选取福州、莆田2所三级甲等医院278例肺癌患者进行调查，评价其信效度及偏倚风险。结果 修订后问卷含7个症状系统、60个条目，跳转式作答后实际作答21个条目。总问卷Cronbach's α系数为0.856，各维度为0.639～0.747；内容效度指数为0.81。验证性因子分析显示模型拟合尚可（χ2/df=2.366，RMSEA=0.070，CFI=0.858），各维度因子载荷、组合信度及平均方差提取量均达到可接受标准，区分效度良好。COSMIN-RoB评价结果为良好。结论 该问卷信效度良好，可用于评估肺癌患者联合药物治疗间歇期症状严重程度。

Objective To revise the Symptom Assessment Questionnaire for Lung Cancer Patients During Combined Drug Therapy Intervals and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods Based on the Chinese version of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory and its lung cancer-specific module, a preliminary questionnaire was developed through literature review, expert panel discussions, and cognitive interviews. From October to December 2023, a convenience sample of 278 lung cancer patients was recruited from two tertiary hospitals in Fuzhou and Putian, China. Reliability, validity, and risk of bias were evaluated. Results The revised questionnaire comprised seven symptom-system domains and 60 items, with 21 items completed through a skip-logic design. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.856, and the coefficients for each domain ranged from 0.639 to 0.747. The content validity index of the questionnaire was 0.81. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated an acceptable model fit (χ2/df = 2.366, RMSEA = 0.070, CFI = 0.858). Factor loadings, composite reliability, and average variance extracted of all domains met acceptable standards, indicating good discriminant validity. The overall risk of bias was rated as good according to the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Conclusion The revised questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity and can be used to assess symptom severity in lung cancer patients during combined drug therapy intervals.

目的 编制适用于老年人群的衰弱综合征中医评估量表并检验其信度与效度。方法 通过文献研究及《中华医典》检索构建条目池，采用4轮德尔菲专家咨询及预调查筛选条目形成初量表；便利抽取300例老年患者行横断面调查，以Fried表型衰弱量表为校标，进行项目分析、Cronbach’s α系数、探索性因子分析及ROC曲线分析。 结果 经条目筛选最终形成含5个核心症状条目（表A）及38个证候条目（表B）的量表。表A校标关联效度r=0.929（P＜0.05），AUC=0.957，灵敏度0.949，特异度0.859；表A+B校标关联效度r=0.648（P＜0.05），AUC=0.827，灵敏度0.606，特异度0.911；总量表Cronbach's α=0.872。结论 所研制的衰弱综合征中医量表信效度良好，可用于老年人衰弱状态筛查及中医证型判别。

Objective: To develop a Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) assessment scale for frailty syndrome in the elderly and to evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods: An item pool was constructed through literature review and searches of the *Chinese Medical Canon*. A preliminary scale was developed through four rounds of Delphi expert consultation and a pilot survey. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a convenience sample of 300 elderly patients. Using the Fried Phenotypic Frailty Scale as the gold standard, item analysis, Cronbach’s α coefficient, exploratory factor analysis, and ROC curve analysis were performed. Results: After item screening, the final scale comprised 5 core symptom items (Table A) and 38 syndrome items (Table B). For Table A, the criterion-related validity was r = 0.929 (P < 0.05), AUC = 0.957, sensitivity = 0.949, and specificity = 0.859; Table A+B showed a test-retest reliability of r = 0.648 (P < 0.05), an AUC of 0.827, a sensitivity of 0.606, and a specificity of 0.911; the total scale had a Cronbach’s α of 0.872. Conclusion: The developed Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) frailty syndrome scale demonstrates good reliability and validity and can be used for screening frailty in the elderly and for distinguishing TCM syndrome patterns.

目的 检验家庭睡眠习惯调查(FISH)在评估孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)患儿睡眠评估中的信度和效度。方法 随机抽取在清远市妇幼保健院儿童语言行为科干预的199例2~6岁ASD共患睡眠障碍患儿,其照顾者同时完成FISH和儿童睡眠习惯问卷(CSHQ),2周后再次同时完成上述两个问卷,以检验FISH的信度和效度。结果 验证性因素分析的结果表明,五因素模型拟合良好(χ²=79.05,df=44,χ²/df=1.80, P<0.001,SRMR=0.06,GFI=0.94,IFI=0.89,RMSEA=0.06),总量表及各分量表有较高的内部一致性信度(0.71~0.77)和重测信度(0.79~0.88)。FISH的白天习惯分别与CSHQ的入睡延迟、夜醒呈负相关,入睡前习惯分别与CSHQ的睡眠抵触、睡眠焦虑、白天睡眠呈负相关,睡眠常规分别与CSHQ的睡眠抵触、入睡延迟、睡眠焦虑呈负相关,睡前父母行为分别与CSHQ的睡眠抵触、睡眠焦虑呈负相关,总分与CSHQ总分呈负相关,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 FISH具有较好的信度和效度,可作为ASD患儿睡眠习惯的评估工具。

Objective To test the reliability and validity of the famity inveritory of sleep habits(FISH) in the sleep assessment among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods A random sample of 199 children with ASD and sleep disorders intervened in the Children's Language and Behavior Department of Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Qingyuan City were selected, their caregivers completed the FISH and the children's sleep habit questionnaire(CSHQ) at the same time, and completed the above two questionnaires again 2 weeks later to test the reliability and validity of the FISH. Results The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the five-factor model fits well (χ²=79.05, df=44, χ²/df=1.80, P<0.001, SRMR=0.06, GFI=0.94, IFI =0.89, RMSEA=0.06), the total scale and each subscale had high internal consistent reliability (0.71~0.77) and test-retest reliability (0.79~0.88). The daytime habits of FISH were negatively correlated with sleep delay and waking up at night of CSHQ respectively, the habits before sleep of FISH were negatively correlated with sleep conflict, sleep anxiety and daytime sleep of CSHQ respectively, the sleep routine of FISH was negatively correlated with sleep conflict, sleep delay and sleep anxiety of CSHQ respectively, the parents' behavior before sleep of FISH was negatively correlated with sleep conflict and sleep anxiety of CSHQ respectively, and the total score of FISH was negatively correlated with CSHQ, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusions The FISH had good reliability and validity, and can be used as an assessment tool for children with ASD.

目的 研究应用手机软件(Goniometer Pro,G-pro)进行测量髋关节活动度(range of motion,ROM)的测量的信度和效度。方法 用量角器和苹果手机软件G-pro来测量髋关节ROM,共有12名受试者参加本次试验。测量者A应用量角器和G-pro来测量髋关节的屈曲角度,同时测量者B应用G-pro进行再次测量髋关节屈曲角度,24 h后测量者A在相同条件下应用G-pro再次测试髋关节屈曲角度。通过分析量角器与G-pro测量结果进行效度分析,通过比较测量者A与B,测量者A前后两次测量进行组间和组内信度研究。结果 在同一测量者量角器与G-pro测量值之间无显著性差异(P >0.05),测量者A用G-pro前后24 h前后测量受试者得出的差值也无显著性差异(P>0.05),测量者A、B用G-pro测量髋关节活动度的测量值无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论 G-pro对于测量髋关节屈曲具有良好的信度和效度。

Objective To study the reliability and validity of measuring hip joint range of motion(ROM) with mobile APP (Goniometer Pro,G-pro). Methods The hip joint ROM was measured with a protractor and iPhone APP (G-pro), 12 subjects participated in this trial. Tester A used a protractor and iPhone APP (G-pro) to measure the flexion angle of the hip joint. Tester B used the mobile APP to measure the hip flexion angle again. Twenty-four hours later, tester A used the mobile APP to measure the hip flexion angle again under the same conditions. The validity was evaluated by analyzing the measurement results of protractor and mobile APP. The inter group and intra group reliability was studied by comparing the two measurements of tester A and tester B, and twice measurements of tester A. Results There was no significant difference between the measurements of protractor and iPhone APP by the same tester (P＞0.05). There was no significant difference in the twice measurements of tester A using iPhone APP (P＞0.05), and there was no significant difference in measurements of tester A and tester B using iPhone APP (P＞0.05). Conclusions The iPhone APP (Goniometer Pro) has good reliability and validity in measuring hip ROM.