目的 评估无托槽隐形矫治应用在正畸拔牙患者中的效果及对牙根吸收、可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1（sICAM-1）的影响。方法 纳入2022年1月—2024年8月的70例正畸拔牙患者,按照治疗方法分组,即对照组（35例,给予固定矫治）、观察组（35例,给予无托槽隐形矫治）,评价组间牙根吸收情况、牙周指标、炎症因子、矫治时间。结果 治疗结束时,两组均出现牙根吸收情况,但是观察组无牙根吸收>3 mm病例,而对照组存在牙根吸收>3 mm、>4 mm病例,P<0.05。治疗前,两组牙周指标[龈沟出血指数（SBI）、牙龈指数（GI）、菌斑指数（PLI）]、炎症因子[白介素-1β（IL-1β）、sICAM-1]比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。治疗后,两组SBI、GI、PLI、IL-1β、sICAM-1升高,且观察组SBI、GI、PLI、IL-1β、sICAM-1低于对照组（P<0.05）。与对照组比较,观察组矫治时间更长（P<0.05）。结论 对正畸拔牙患者进行无托槽隐形矫治,虽然治疗时间长,但是可以抑制牙根吸收,减轻炎症反应,提高牙周健康水平。

Objective To evaluate the effect of clear aligner treatment on orthodontic tooth extraction patients and its impact on root resorption and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1（sICAM-1）．Methods Seventy orthodontic extraction patients from January 2022 to August 2024 were included and divided into two groups according to treatment methods：a control group（35 cases,receiving fixed orthodontic treatment）and an observation group（35 cases,receiving clear aligner treatment）． The root resorption,periodontal indicators,inflammatory factors,and orthodontic treatment time between groups were evaluated．Results At the end of treatment,both groups showed root resorption,but there were no cases of root resorption>3 mm in the observation group,while there were cases of root resorption>3 mm and>4 mm in the control group,P<0.05．Before treatment,there was no difference in periodontal indicators（gingival bleeding index[SBI],gingival index[GI],plaque index[PLI]）,inflammatory factors（interleukin-1 β[IL-1 β],sICAM-1） between the groups,P>0.05．After treatment,SBI,GI,PLI,IL-1 β,sICAM-1 increased in both groups,but SBI,GI,PLI,IL-1 β,sICAM-1 were lower in the observation group,P<0.05．Compared with the control group,the observation group had a longer orthodontic treatment time,P<0.05．Conclusions Although the clear aligner treatment time for orthodontic extraction patients is longer,it can inhibit root resorption,reduce inflammatory reactions,and improve periodontal health．

       目的   评估无托槽隐形矫治应用在正畸拔牙患者中的效果及对牙根吸收、可溶性细胞间黏附分子-1（sICAM-1）的影响。方法   纳入2022年1月—2024年8月的70例正畸拔牙患者，按照治疗方法分组，即对照组（35例，给予固定矫治）、观察组（35例，给予无托槽隐形矫治），评价组间牙根吸收情况、牙周指标、炎症因子、矫治时间。结果   治疗结束时，两组均出现牙根吸收情况，但是观察组无牙根吸收＞3 mm病例，而对照组存在牙根吸收＞3 mm、＞4 mm病例，P＜0.05。治疗前，两组牙周指标［龈沟出血指数（SBI）、牙龈指数（GI）、菌斑指数（PLI）］、炎症因子［白介素-1β（IL-1β）、sICAM-1］比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。治疗后，两组SBI、GI、PLI、IL-1β、sICAM-1升高，且观察组SBI、GI、PLI、IL-1β、sICAM-1低于对照组（P＜0.05）。与对照组比较，观察组矫治时间更长（P＜0.05）。结论   对正畸拔牙患者进行无托槽隐形矫治，虽然治疗时间长，但是可以抑制牙根吸收，减轻炎症反应，提高牙周健康水平。

       Objective  To evaluate the effect of clear aligner treatment on orthodontic tooth extraction patients and its impact on root resorption and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1（sICAM-1）．Methods  Seventy orthodontic extraction patients from January 2022 to August 2024 were included and divided into two groups according to treatment methods：a control group（35 cases，receiving fixed orthodontic treatment）and an observation group（35 cases，receiving clear aligner treatment）．The root resorption，periodontal indicators，inflammatory factors，and orthodontic treatment time between groups were evaluated．Results  At the end of treatment，both groups showed root resorption，but there were no cases of root resorption＞3 mm in the observation group，while there were cases of root resorption＞3 mm and＞4 mm in the control group，P＜0.05．Before treatment，there was no difference in periodontal indicators（gingival bleeding index［SBI］，gingival index［GI］，plaque index［PLI］），inflammatory factors（interleukin-1 β［IL-1 β］，sICAM-1） between the groups，P＞0.05．After treatment，SBI，GI，PLI，IL-1 β，sICAM-1 increased in both groups，but SBI，GI，PLI，IL-1 β，sICAM-1 were lower in the  observation group，P＜0.05．Compared with the control group，the observation group had a longer orthodontic treatment time，P＜0.05．Conclusions  Although the clear aligner treatment time for orthodontic extraction patients is longer，it can inhibit root resorption，reduce inflammatory reactions，and improve periodontal health．

      目的    分析拔除导致邻牙牙根外吸收（ERR）的埋伏阻生第三磨牙后ERR患牙的预后情况及影响因素。方法   对32例埋伏阻生第三磨牙挤压致ERR的患牙，在拔除阻生第三磨牙后，通过临床症状、电活力测试观察第二磨牙牙髓的预后，根据其预后不同，分为保髓成功组及保髓失败组，比较两组的基本信息（年龄、性别）、患牙部位、牙根吸收类型，分析影响ERR患牙预后的相关因素。结果   下颌ERR患牙保髓成功率（91.67%）高于上颌ERR患牙（62.50%）（P=0.085），牙根吸收未及髓腔的患牙保髓成功率（100%）高于牙根吸收及髓腔的患牙（70.59%）（P=0.046），两组间的基本信息比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论   当患牙牙根吸收未及牙髓时或患牙位于下颌时，拔除埋伏第三磨牙后ERR患牙预后相对良好，故应尽早拔除已导致ERR发生的埋伏阻生第三磨牙。

       Objective  To analyze the prognosis and influencing factors of external root resorption（ERR）of adjacent teeth after the removal of impacted third molar that caused ERR．Methods  Thirty-two cases of impacted third molars with external root resorption caused by compression were treated．After the extraction of the impacted third molars，the prognosis of the pulp of the second molars was observed through clinical symptoms and electrical activity tests．According to their different prognoses，they were divided into a successful pulp preservation group and a failed pulp preservation group．The basic information（age，gender），affected tooth location，and root resorption type of the two groups were compared，and the relevant factors affecting the prognosis of ERR patients were analyzed．Results  The success rate of pulp preservation for mandibular ERR patients（91.67%）was higher than that for maxillary ERR patients（62.50%）（P=0.085），and the success rate of pulp preservation for ERR not involving pulp cavity（100%）was higher than that for ERR involving pulp cavity（70.59%）（P=0.046）．There was no significant difference in basic information between the two groups（P＞0.05）．Conclusions  When the root resorption of the affected tooth does not reach the pulp or when the affected tooth is located in the lower jaw，the prognosis of the affected tooth after the impacted third molar removed is good．Therefore，the impacted third molar should be removed as soon as possible to prevent ERR from occurring．