目的 分析不同年龄、不同季节河源市源城区呼吸道感染的病原学情况,指导临床用药。方法 回顾性研究2020年3月—2022年2月2 468例呼吸道感染的住院患儿,取咽部分泌物送广州达安临床检验中心进行呼吸道核酸六项检测并分析结果。包括：肺炎链球菌（Sp）、呼吸道合胞病毒（RSV）、卡他莫拉菌（MC）、流感嗜血杆菌（Hi）、肺炎支原体（LP）、腺病毒（ADV）。结果 （1）2 468例患儿的标本中阳性率52.8%,其中RSV最高,其他依次为Sp、Hi、MC、MP、ADV。而混合感染仅次于RSV。（2）婴儿组和幼儿组以RSV感染为主,在学龄前组和学龄组儿童中,以Sp感染为主,各病原体的混合感染组合很多,一种细菌合并一种病毒多见。（3）秋冬季是河源市源城区呼吸道感染的高发季节,RSV是秋冬季呼吸道感染最主要的病原体。结论 秋冬季节为河源市源城区呼吸道感染的高发季节,RSV为该季节的主要病原体。RSV也是婴幼儿组感染的主要致病菌,随着年龄增大,细菌感染导致的呼吸道疾病逐渐占优势。混合感染在各年龄组中均占比较高,值得临床诊疗的重视。

Objective To analyze the etiology of respiratory tract infection in Yuancheng District of Heyuan City ,which was in different ages and seasons,and to provide guidance of clinical drug usage．Methods Cases of 2 468 hospitalized children with respiratory tract infection from March 2020 to February 2022 were analyzed．The secretion from pharynx was collected and sent to Guangzhou Da’an Clinical Examination Center for six respiratory nucleic acid tests and then the results were analyzed,including Streptococcus pneumoniae（Sp）,respiratory syncytial virus（RSV）,Moraxella catarrhalis（MC）,Haemophilus influenzae（Hi）,Mycoplasma pneumonia（MP）,adenovirus（ADV）．Results The positive rate of 2 468 hospitalized children with respiratory tract infection was 52.8%,of which the highest was RSV,followed by Sp,Hi,MC,MP,ADV．Meanwhile the mixed infection rate was second to RSV．RSV infection was the main infection in infant group and early-aged children group,while in preschool group and school-aged group,Sp infection was the main infection．There were many mixed infection of pathogen,and one bacteria combined with one virus was more common．Respiratory tract infection had high incidence in autumn and winter in Yuancheng District of Heyuan City,RSV was the major pathogen．Conclusions Autumn and winter were the seasons with high respiratory tract infection incidence in Yuancheng District of Heyuan City,and RSV was the main pathogen in these two seasons．RSV was also the main pathogen of infant group infection．But with the increase of children’s age,bacterial infection became the main reason of respiratory tract diseases．Mixed infection accounts for a high proportion in all age groups,which should be valued in clinical diagnosis and treatment．

目的 分析献血者乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)核酸检测非重复反应性确认及追踪结果。方法 对1 200例于我站无偿献血者的血液样本进行非重复反应性确认,补充乙肝“两对半”检测,并对其部分单项核酸检测反应的患者予以回访结果追踪。结果 1 200份无偿献血血液样本单项核酸检测有反应性者150份(12.50%)。150份单项核酸检测有反应性样本经重新病毒核酸检测后,仍有58例样本有反应性(38.67%)、92例样本为非反应性(61.33%)。其中有18例献血者实际召回抽血,完成两次追踪,第一次追踪60~125天,第二次追踪间隔天数在160~356天,第一次追踪HBV DNA有反应(+)8例,第二次追踪仍存在反应(+);7例HBV DNA有反应者存在抗-HBc阳性(+)。核酸反应检测HBV-DNA阳性值10~17有37.25%,高于核酸反应检测值<10的4.17%(P<0.05)。结论 部分单项核酸检测反应无偿献血者存在一定的输血传播HBV风险,多为HBV隐匿性感染,此时需要重视其输血情况,屏蔽单项核酸反应性献血者。

Objective To analyze the results of nonrepetitive reactivity of HBV nucleic acid detection in blood donors. Methods 1 200 blood samples from our station were confirmed by nonrepetitive reaction, supplemented with the “two to half” test of hepatitis B, and some patients with single nucleic acid detection were followed up. Results One hundred and fifty samples (12.50%) were reactive in single nucleic acid detection in 1 200 blood samples. After the virus nucleic acid detection, 58 samples were reactive (38.67%), 92 were nonreactive (61.33%). 18 donors were actually recalled and drew blood, completed two tracking. The first tracking time was 60-125 days, the second time interval was 160-356 days. In the first tracking 8 cases had HBV DNA reaction (+) , which still had reaction in the second tracking; 7 HBV DNA positive donors had HBC antibody (+).The proportion of HBV-DNA positive with 10-17 value in mucleic acid reaction test(37.25%) was higher than that with value below 10(4.17%,P＜0.05). Conclusion Some donors with single nucleic acid detection reaction have a certain risk of transmission of HBV, most of them had hidden infection of HBV. At this time, we should pay attention to the blood transfusion and avoid the single nucleic acid reactive donors.