目的 探讨及比较CURB-65、PSI、SMART-COP及APACHEⅡ 4种临床评分对重症社区获得性肺炎(SCAP)患者的早期诊断价值。方法 采用前瞻性研究方法,收集2011年10月—2014年2月广州市第一人民医院呼吸内科收治的67例SCAP及同期33例普通CAP患者的临床资料,记录入组后24小时内CURB-65、PSI、SMART-COP及APACHEⅡ评分的最差值,比较4种临床评分系统对SCAP的早期诊断价值。结果 SCAP组CURB-65、PSI、SMART-COP及APACHEⅡ评分均高于普通CAP组患者[CURB-65(分):3.06±1.10 比0.85±0.79,P<0.001;PSI(分):144.93±36.48比73.94±27.17,P<0.001; SMART-COP(分):6.54±1.41比 1.67±1.02,P<0.001; APACHEⅡ(分):20.79±5.69比7.94±3.87,P<0.001]。CURB-65≥3分、PSI≥130分、SMART-COP≥3分及APACHEⅡ≥15分诊断SCAP的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)分别为0.940[95% CI:0.89~0.98, P<0.001],0.933[95%CI:0.88~0.97,P<0.001],0.999[95%CI:0.99~1.0,P<0.001],0.976[95%CI:0.95~0.99,P<0.001],敏感度分别为65.6%、71.6%、100%、88.1%,特异度分别为100%、100%、78.7%、93.9%。结论 CURB-65及PSI评分特异度好,但敏感度低,易漏诊,SMART-COP和APACHE Ⅱ评分诊断效能更佳。

Objective To evaluate and compare the early diagnosis value of CURB-65,PSI,SMART-COP and APACHEⅡin patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. Methods This was a prospective study conducted in department of respiratory in Guangzhou First People's Hospital. We included 67 SCAP patients and 33 CAP patients between October of 2011and February of 2014. The lowest scores within 24 hours of CURB-65 score,PSI score,SMART-COP score,APACHE Ⅱ score,respectively,for each patients were recorded. Prediction of SCAP as made in four scoring systems was compared. Results CURB-65 score,PSI score,SMART-COP score,APACHE Ⅱ score were higher in SCAP as compared with that of CAP(CURB-65:3.0±1.1 vs 0.9±0.8,P<0.001;PSI:144.6±36.4 vs 73.9±27.1,P<0.001; SMART-COP:6.5±1.4 vs 1.6±1.0,P<0.001; APACHEⅡ:20.6±5.6 vs 7.9±3.8,P<0.001). ROC curve for CURB-65 score≥ 3 scores,PSI score≥ 130 scores,SMART-COP score≥3 scores and APACHE Ⅱ score ≥ 15 scores in the early diagnosis SCAP were 0.940[95%CI:0.89~0.98,P<0.001],0.933[95%CI:0.88~0.97,P<0.001],0.999[95%CI:0.99~1.0,P<0.001],0.976[95%CI:0.95~0.99,P<0.001]. Sensitivity of four kinds of scoring system was 65.6%,71.6%,100%,88.1%, with specificity of 100%,100%,78.7%,93.9% respectively. Conclusion The specificity of diagnosis was better in the CURB-65 and PSI score,but the sensitivity was low and easy to miss diagnosis. SMART-COP and APACHEⅡscore systems had a better diagnostic value on SCAP.

目的 探讨红细胞分布宽度(RDW)与老年重症社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者病情严重程度及预后的相关性。方法 将103例老年重症CAP患者按照近期预后分为存活组(n=83例)及死亡组(n=20例),按照RDW的水平分为RDW≥14.5%组(n=83例)和RDW＜14.5%组(n=20例);记录患者的一般临床资料及相关实验室检查指标,比较各组之间的差异,并利用Logistic回归模型分析老年重症CAP患者近期死亡的危险因素。结果 死亡组中的患者入院APACHEⅡ评分、CRP、PCT、RDW水平均高于存活组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。RDW 异常率随着PSI 级别的增高而增高,RDW 异常率分别为PSIⅠ-Ⅱ级7.32%(3/41、 PSI Ⅲ级16.67%(6/36)、PSI Ⅳ级39.13%(9/23)、PSIⅤ级 66.67%(2/3),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。Spearsman相关性分析显示:RDW与APACHEⅡ评分、CRP、PCT、PSI评分呈正相关(r_s分别为=0.353,0.363,0.432,0.362,P均＜0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示: RDW(OR=2.024,P＜0.05)是老年重症CAP患者近期死亡的独立危险因素。结论 RDW水平随着老年重症CAP患者病情严重程度的增加而增加,RDW增高亦是患者近期死亡的高危因素。