目的 观察环泊酚在老年患者无痛胃肠镜检查中的麻醉效果和不良反应。方法 选择80例65岁以上行无痛胃肠镜检查的老年患者,将患者随机分为环泊酚组（C组）40例和丙泊酚组（P组）40例。每例患者均静脉注射舒芬太尼0.08 μg/kg,30 s后C组给予环泊酚0.3 mg/kg、P组给予丙泊酚1.5 mg/kg。记录2组患者麻醉前（T₀）、睫毛反射消失时（T₁）、置入胃镜后即刻（T₂）和操作结束时（T₃）的心率（HR）和平均动脉压（MAP）;记录2组患者检查操作时间、清醒时间、追加药物次数及静脉注射痛、呼吸抑制、呛咳、体动等不良反应发生情况。结果 2组患者行胃肠镜检查操作时间、麻醉清醒时间和追加药物次数比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。与T₀时间点（102.6±14.1 mmHg）比较,P组患者的MAP在T₁（86.0±12.5 mmHg）、T₂（86.1±13.2 mmHg）、T₃（92.8±12.6 mmHg）时间点明显下降,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;与C组T₁（95.9±10.8 mmHg）、T₂（96.3±9.6 mmHg）时间点比较,P组的MAP在T₁（86.0±12.5 mmHg）、T₂（86.1±13.2 mmHg）时均明显降低（P<0.05）。C组患者静脉注射痛、呼吸抑制的发生率明显低于P组（P<0.05）;2组体动和呛咳的发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 环泊酚0.3 mg/kg在老年患者胃肠镜检查中能提供和丙泊酚1.5 mg/kg相似的麻醉效果,环泊酚组的老年患者发生注射痛、血压下降、呼吸抑制的比例更低。

Objective To observe the effect of ciprofol and propofol in painless gastroenteroscopy in elderly patients．Methods A total of 80 elderly patients aged 65 or above who underwent painless gastroenteroscopy were randomly divided into a group of 40 patients receiving ciprofol（Group C）and a group of 40 patients receiving propofol（Group P）．All patients were given sufentanil 0.08 μg/kg,and group C was given ciprofol 0.3 mg/kg,group P was given propofol 1.5 mg/kg after 30 seconds．The heart rate（HR）and mean arterial pressure（MAP）of two groups of patients before anesthesia（T₀）,at the disappearance of eyelash reflex（T₁）,after gastroscopy insertion（T₂）,and at the end of the procedure（T₃）were recorded．The operating time,anesthesia awakening time,number of additional medications and the adverse reactions such as injection pain,respiratory depression,cough,body movements were also recorded．Results There were no significant differences（P>0.05）in the gastroenteroscopy operating time,recovery time and number of additional medications between the two groups．Compared with T₀ time point（102.6±14.1 mmHg）,the MAP of group P patients significantly decreased at T₁（86.0±12.5 mmHg）,T₂（86.1±13.2 mmHg）and T₃（92.8±12.6 mmHg）time points（P<0.05）．Compared with Group C at T₁（95.9±10.8 mmHg）,T₂（96.3±9.6 mmHg）time points,the MAP of Group P decreased significantly at T₁（86.0±12.5 mmHg）and T₂（86.1±13.2 mmHg）time points（P<0.05）．The incidences of injection pain and respiratory depression in group C were significantly lower than those in group P（P<0.05）．There was no statistically significant difference in the incidences of body movements and cough between the two groups（P>0.05）．Conclusions Ciprofol 0.3 mg/kg combined with sufentanil can provide anesthesia effect similar to that of propofol 1.5 mg/kg combined with sufentanil in gastroenteroscopy of elderly patients．The proportions of injection pain,blood pressure decreasing and respiratory depression in elderly patients in the ciprofol group were lower．

目的 对比纳布啡联合环泊酚、纳布啡联合丙泊酚应用于老年患者无痛胃镜中的效果。方法 选取厦门市中医院2021年10月至2022年10月收治的180例老年患者（均行无痛胃肠镜检查）为研究对象,按照随机数表法分组,其中A组90例患者给予纳布啡联合环泊酚,B组90例患者给予纳布啡联合丙泊酚,对比两组患者麻醉相关指标、血流动力学、围术期不良反应。结果 两组患者诱导量、诱导时间、追加次数、总追加量、苏醒时间、恢复室停留时间对比差异均无统计学意义（t=1.486、0.830、1.157、0.941、0.906、1.403,均P>0.05）;重复测量方差分析结果显示,分组因素间收缩压（SBP）（F=30.019,P<0.001）、心率（HR）（F=282.057,P<0.001）、SpO₂（F=64.518,P<0.001）、;时间因素SBP（F=21.780,P<0.001）、HR（F=345.118,P<0.001）、SpO₂（F=41.762,P<0.001）;分组与时间交互时间因素SBP（F=12.941,P<0.001）、HR（F=193.295,P<0.001）、SpO₂（F=13.546,P<0.001）,差异均有统计学意义。折线图直观显示,A组患者SBP、HR、SpO₂、较B组低。;A组患者围术期不良反应发生率（20.00%）低于B组患者（56.67%）（χ²=25.593,P<0.001）。结论 两种麻醉方案应用于老年无痛胃肠镜,麻醉效果相近,环泊酚复合纳布啡血流动力学更稳定,且围术期不良反应的发生率较低。

Objective To compare the effects of nalbuphine combined with ciprofol and nalbuphine combined with propofol on painless gastroscopy in elderly patients. Methods A total of 180 elderly patients（all underwent painless gastroscopy）admitted to Xiamen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from October 2021 to October 2022 were selected as the study subjects．They were randomly divided into groups using a random number table method．Among them,90 patients in Group A were given a combination of nalbuphine and ciprofol,while 90 patients in Group B were given a combination of nalbuphine and propofol．Anesthesia related indicators,hemodynamics,and perioperative adverse reactions were compared between the two groups．There was no statistically significant difference in the induction amount,induction time,number of additional times,total additional amount,awakening time,and recovery room stay time between the two groups of patients（t=1.486,0.830,1.157,0.941,0.906,1.403,all P>0.05）．The results of repeated measures analysis of variance showed that there were statistically significant differences among the grouping factors,including SBP（F=30.019,P<0.001）,HR（F=282.057,P<0.001）,SpO₂（F=64.518,P<0.001）,time factors SBP（F=21.780,P<0.001）,HR（F=345．118,P<0.001）,SpO₂（F=41.762,P<0.001）,and interaction factors SBP（F=12.941,P<0.001）,HR（F=193.295,P<0.001）,and SpO₂（F=13.546,P<0.001）．The line chart visually shows that the SBP,HR,SpO₂ of Group A patients were lower than those of Group B．The incidence of perioperative adverse reactions in Group A patients（20.00%）was lower than that in Group B patients（56.67%）（χ²=25.593,P<0.001）. Conclusions The two anesthesia regimens used for elderly painless gastroscopy have similar anesthesia effects,with more stable hemodynamics of ciprofol combined with nalbuphine,and a lower incidence of perioperative adverse reactions．