目的 修订肺癌患者联合药物治疗间歇期症状评估问卷，并评价其信效度。方法 以中文版安德森症状评估量表及肺癌特异性模块为基础，经文献分析、专家会议和认知性访谈形成测试版问卷。于2023年10-12月便利选取福州、莆田2所三级甲等医院278例肺癌患者进行调查，评价其信效度及偏倚风险。结果 修订后问卷含7个症状系统、60个条目，跳转式作答后实际作答21个条目。总问卷Cronbach's α系数为0.856，各维度为0.639～0.747；内容效度指数为0.81。验证性因子分析显示模型拟合尚可（χ2/df=2.366，RMSEA=0.070，CFI=0.858），各维度因子载荷、组合信度及平均方差提取量均达到可接受标准，区分效度良好。COSMIN-RoB评价结果为良好。结论 该问卷信效度良好，可用于评估肺癌患者联合药物治疗间歇期症状严重程度。
Objective To revise the Symptom Assessment Questionnaire for Lung Cancer Patients During Combined Drug Therapy Intervals and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods Based on the Chinese version of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory and its lung cancer-specific module, a preliminary questionnaire was developed through literature review, expert panel discussions, and cognitive interviews. From October to December 2023, a convenience sample of 278 lung cancer patients was recruited from two tertiary hospitals in Fuzhou and Putian, China. Reliability, validity, and risk of bias were evaluated. Results The revised questionnaire comprised seven symptom-system domains and 60 items, with 21 items completed through a skip-logic design. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.856, and the coefficients for each domain ranged from 0.639 to 0.747. The content validity index of the questionnaire was 0.81. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated an acceptable model fit (χ2/df = 2.366, RMSEA = 0.070, CFI = 0.858). Factor loadings, composite reliability, and average variance extracted of all domains met acceptable standards, indicating good discriminant validity. The overall risk of bias was rated as good according to the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Conclusion The revised questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity and can be used to assess symptom severity in lung cancer patients during combined drug therapy intervals.
目的 探讨64层螺旋CT三维重建技术在主动脉夹层介入术前评估中的价值。方法 选择2023年7月—2024年5月在潜江市中心医院诊治的主动脉夹层疑似患者96例为研究对象,所有患者均进行64层螺旋CT三维重建技术检查, 记录成像参数。所有患者在64层螺旋CT三维重建后进行介入治疗, 以介入检查结果为金标准, 判断64层螺旋CT三维重建技术在主动脉夹层介入术前评估中的价值。结果 在96例患者中, 64层螺旋CT三维重建联合判断为主动脉夹层60例, 其中Ⅰ型32例、Ⅱ型20例、Ⅲ型8例,其中再现（VR）、最大密度投影（MIP）及多平面重建（MPR）分别判断为主动脉夹层56例、54例、56例。在96例患者中, 64层螺旋CT三维重建检查的破口层面主动脉平均直径（3.08±0.25）cm、破口至左锁骨下平均距离（4.05±0.26）cm, 与介入治疗检查（3.05±0.36）cm、（4.06±0.14）cm, 对比差异无统计学意义（t=0.671, P=0.503; t=0.332, P=0.740）。64层螺旋CT三维重建联合、VR、MIP、MPR对主动脉夹层的诊断灵敏度分别为98.33%、93.22%、89.83%、94.92%, 特异度分别为97.30%、97.30%、97.30%、100.00%, 准确率分别为98.96%、94.79%、92.71%、96.88%。结论 64层螺旋CT三维重建技术在主动脉夹层介入术前评估中具有很高的灵敏度、特异度与准确率。
Objective To explore and analyze the value of 64-slice spiral CT three-dimensional reconstruction technology in the preoperative assessment of aortic dissection（AD）intervention．Methods From July 2023 to May 2024, 96 cases of patients suspected of aortic dissection treated in our hospital were selected as the research subjects．All patients underwent 64-slice spiral CT three-dimensional reconstruction technology examination, and imaging parameters were recorded．After the 64-slice spiral CT three-dimensional reconstruction, all patients were given interventional treatment, and the results of the interventional examination were used as the “gold standard” to evaluate the value of 64-slice spiral CT three-dimensional reconstruction technology in the preoperative assessment of aortic dissection intervention．Results Among the 96 patients,64-slice spiral CT three-dimensional reconstruction combined diagnosis identified 60 cases of aortic dissection,including 32 type I, 20 type II, and 8 type III cases．volume rendering（VR）, maximum intensity projection（MIP）, and muhiplanar reconstrudion（MPR） identified 56, 54, and 56 cases of aortic dissection,respectively．In 96 patients, the mean aortic diameter at the lacerated level and the mean distance from the lacerated to the left subclavicular level were（3.08±0.25）cm and（4.05±0.26）cm respectively in 64-slice spiral CT three-dimensional reconstruction examination, compared with（3.05±0.36）cm and（4.06±0.14）cm in interventional examination．There was no difference in comparison（t=0.671, P=0.503; t=0.332, P=0.740）．The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 64-slice spiral CT three-dimensional reconstruction combined, VR, MIP, and MPR for the diagnosis of aortic dissection were 98.33%, 93.22%, 89.83%, 94.92%, specificity were 97.30%, 97.30%, 97.30%, 100%, accuracy were 98.96%, 94.79%, 92.71%, 96.88%．Conclusions Technology of 64-slice spiral CT three-dimensional reconstruction has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the preoperative assessment of aortic dissection intervention and is worth promoting and applying clinically．
目的 探讨血清胱抑素C（SCys-C）、同型半胱氨酸（Hcy）及尿微量白蛋白（UmAlb）在高血压患者肾损害早期评估中的应用价值。方法 选择2022年9月—2023年9月期间福建中医药大学附属第三人民医院接收的150例高血压患者作为观察组,另选择健康体检者150例为对照组,测定肾小球滤过率（GFR）、SCys-C、Hcy、UmAlb,比较不同血压程度及对照组的各指标水平,比较观察组各指标检测阳性率及诊断符合率,依据GFR值评估肾损害程度,比较不同肾损害程度患者的SCys-C、Hcy、UmAlb水平。结果 高血压2级、高血压3级患者SCys-C、Hcy、UmAlb水平高于高血压1级患者（t=5.255、10.976、21.578,P<0.05;t=7.378、18.012、23.708,P<0.05）及对照组患者（t=8.308、19.675、31.891,P<0.05;t=10.661、31.511、21.578,P<0.05）,高血压3级患者高于高血压2级患者（t=2.776、12.725、7.779,P<0.05）。观察组肾损害患者SCys-C、Hcy、UmAlb的阳性率79.41%、73.53%、83.82%高于无肾损害患者的阳性率6.10%、4.88%、6.10%（χ2=83.733、76.040、92.613,P<0.05）。观察组中重度肾损害、轻度肾损害患者的SCys-C、Hcy、UmAlb水平高于无损害患者（t=7.567、24.214、30.836,P<0.05;t=5.783、16.054、25.164,P<0.05）,中重度肾损害高于轻度肾损害患者（t=2.685、7.179、9.561,P<0.05）。结论 高血压分级越高患者的SCys-C、Hcy、UmAlb水平越高,各指标联合检测的阳性率高,而且SCys-C、Hcy、UmAlb水平越高,肾损害程度越严重。
Objective To explore the application value of serum cystatin C（SCys-C）,homocysteine（Hcy） and urinary microalbumin（UmAlb）in early assessment of renal damage in hypertensive patients．Methods A total of 150 hypertensive patients admitted to the Third People’s Hospital Affiliated to Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from September 2022 to September 2023 were selected as the observation group,and 150 healthy individuals were selected as the control group．Glomerular filtration rate（GFR）,serum cystatin C（SCys-C）,homocysteine（Hcy）,and UmAlb were measured,and the levels of various indicators in different blood pressure levels and the control group were compared．The positive rate and diagnostic accuracy of each indicator in the observation group were compared,and the degree of renal damage was evaluated based on GFR values．The levels of SCys-C,Hcy and UmAlb in patients with different degrees of renal damage were compared．Results The levels of SCys-C,Hcy and UmAlb in patients with grade 2 and grade 3 hypertension were significantly higher than those in patients with grade 1 hypertension（t=5.255,10.976,21.578,P<0.05;t=7.378,18.012,23.708,P<0.05）,as well as in the control group（t=8.308,19.675,31.891,P<0.05;t=10.661,31.511,21.578,P<0.05）,patients with grade 3 hypertension were significantly higher than those with grade 2 hypertension（t=2.776,12.725,7.779,P<0.05）．The positive rates of SCys-C,Hcy and UmAlb in patients with renal injury in the observation group were 79.41%,73.53% and 83.82%,which were significantly higher than the positive rates of 6.10%,4.88% and 6.10% in patients without renal injury（χ2=83.733,76.040,92.613,P<0.05）．The levels of SCys-C,Hcy and UmAlb in patients with severe and mild kidney damage in the observation group were significantly higher than those in patients without damage（t=7.567,24.214,30.836,P<0.05;t=5.783,16.054,25.164,P<0.05）,patients with moderate to severe kidney damage were significantly higher than those with mild kidney damage（t=2.685,7.179,9.561,P<0.05）．Conclusions The higher the grading of hypertension,the higher the levels of SCys-C,Hcy and UmAlb in patients,and the higher the positive rate of combined detection of various indicators．Moreover,the higher the levels of SCys-C,Hcy and UmAlb,the more severe the renal damage．
目的 评价现有关于干预组仅涉及不同针具针刺或联合常规针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症系统评价的方法学质量,以比较不同针具针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症的治疗效果。方法 通过CNKI（中国知网）、万方数据库、VIP（维普）、PubMed、Web of Science等数据库以及其他相关电子资源,对诊断、治疗腰椎间盘突出症的多种针灸技术进行全面的研究。使用AMSTAR2软件,对所有参与的系统性评估结果进行地分析,并根据不同的检测结果,确定文献筛选标准。通过Revman5.4和Cochrance风险偏倚工具,以及Stata16.0的网格Meta分析,挑选了3 381个满足纳入排除要求的随机对照试验。结果 以Stata 16.0统计软件制作排序图可知,杵针+电针的临床有效率SUCRA=81.6%排名第一;目测类比评分显示,银质针SUCRA（用于评估疗效的指标）=95%,排名第一。结论 根据现有的研究证据,杵针+电针以及银质针优于其他9种干预措施,但确切的结果仍需要大量的随机对照试验来证明。
Objective To evaluate the methodological quality of the existing systematic evaluation of the intervention group involving only different needle sets of acupuncture or combined with conventional acupuncture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation,in order to compare the therapeutic effect of different needle sets of acupuncture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation．Methods Through CNKI,Wanfang database,VIP,PubMed,web of science and other databases as well as other relevant resources,a variety of acupuncture techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation were comprehensively studied．Through the use of AMSTAR2 software,all participating systematic evaluation results were effectively analyzed,and according to different test results,which literature meets the requirements were determined．Through revman5.4,Cochrane risk bias tool,and grid meta-analysis of stata16.0,3 381 RCTs meeting the inclusion and exclusion requirements were selected．Results According to the ranking chart made by stata16.0 statistical software,the clinical effective rate of pestle needle + electroacupuncture ranked first with sucra=81.6%．According to the visual analogy score,the silver needle sucra=95%,ranking first．Conclusions According to the existing research evidence,pestle needle + electroacupuncture and silver needle are better than the other nine interventions,but the exact results still need a large number of randomized controlled trials to prove．
吞咽障碍是慢性阻塞性肺疾病（COPD）的常见并发症之一,并且是COPD急性加重的危险因素之一,对患者预后造成不良影响。对COPD患者吞咽障碍的发生及严重程度进行准确的评估,是进行科学管理的首要前提。本文对COPD吞咽障碍评估工具的基本特点、应用现状及发展现状进行综述,为临床医务人员选择评估工具提供借鉴。
Dysphagia is one of the common complications of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease（COPD）,and is one of the risk factors of acute exacerbation of COPD,which has adverse effects on the prognosis of patients．Accurate assessment of the occurrence and severity of dysphagia in COPD patients is the first step for scientific management．In this paper,the basic characteristics,application status and development status of assessment tools for COPD patients with dysphagia are reviewed,which can provide reference for the selection of assessment tools for clinical medical staff．
目的 检验家庭睡眠习惯调查(FISH)在评估孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)患儿睡眠评估中的信度和效度。方法 随机抽取在清远市妇幼保健院儿童语言行为科干预的199例2~6岁ASD共患睡眠障碍患儿,其照顾者同时完成FISH和儿童睡眠习惯问卷(CSHQ),2周后再次同时完成上述两个问卷,以检验FISH的信度和效度。结果 验证性因素分析的结果表明,五因素模型拟合良好(χ2=79.05,df=44,χ2/df=1.80, P<0.001,SRMR=0.06,GFI=0.94,IFI=0.89,RMSEA=0.06),总量表及各分量表有较高的内部一致性信度(0.71~0.77)和重测信度(0.79~0.88)。FISH的白天习惯分别与CSHQ的入睡延迟、夜醒呈负相关,入睡前习惯分别与CSHQ的睡眠抵触、睡眠焦虑、白天睡眠呈负相关,睡眠常规分别与CSHQ的睡眠抵触、入睡延迟、睡眠焦虑呈负相关,睡前父母行为分别与CSHQ的睡眠抵触、睡眠焦虑呈负相关,总分与CSHQ总分呈负相关,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 FISH具有较好的信度和效度,可作为ASD患儿睡眠习惯的评估工具。
Objective To test the reliability and validity of the famity inveritory of sleep habits(FISH) in the sleep assessment among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods A random sample of 199 children with ASD and sleep disorders intervened in the Children's Language and Behavior Department of Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Qingyuan City were selected, their caregivers completed the FISH and the children's sleep habit questionnaire(CSHQ) at the same time, and completed the above two questionnaires again 2 weeks later to test the reliability and validity of the FISH. Results The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the five-factor model fits well (χ2=79.05, df=44, χ2/df=1.80, P<0.001, SRMR=0.06, GFI=0.94, IFI =0.89, RMSEA=0.06), the total scale and each subscale had high internal consistent reliability (0.71~0.77) and test-retest reliability (0.79~0.88). The daytime habits of FISH were negatively correlated with sleep delay and waking up at night of CSHQ respectively, the habits before sleep of FISH were negatively correlated with sleep conflict, sleep anxiety and daytime sleep of CSHQ respectively, the sleep routine of FISH was negatively correlated with sleep conflict, sleep delay and sleep anxiety of CSHQ respectively, the parents' behavior before sleep of FISH was negatively correlated with sleep conflict and sleep anxiety of CSHQ respectively, and the total score of FISH was negatively correlated with CSHQ, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusions The FISH had good reliability and validity, and can be used as an assessment tool for children with ASD.
目的 探究序贯器官衰竭评分(sequential organ failure assessment,SOFA)联合可溶性程序性死亡因子-1(soluble programmed death-1,sPD-1)水平对脓毒症患者的预后影响。方法 选我院2019年3月—2021年3月期间86例脓毒症患者为研究对象,依据其预后情况(28 d转归)分为生存组(59例)、死亡组(27例),记录两组患者sPD-1、炎症细胞因子水平、SOFA评分及急性生理学与慢性健康状况评价系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分情况,分析28 d死亡危险因素,并以ROC曲线分析SOFA+sPD-1对脓毒症患者预后评估价值。结果 死亡组年龄、C反应蛋白、降钙素原、sPD-1水平及SOFA、APACHEⅡ评分均较生存组高(P＜0.05);经Logistic回归分析,sPD-1、SOFA、APACHEⅡ为28 d死亡脓毒症患者独立预测因素(P＜0.05);联合预测后,SOFA+sPD-1的ROC曲线下面积最大,为0.862,敏感度、特异度分别为88.89%、88.14%。结论 在对脓毒症患者预后评估中,sPD-1、SOFA评分均为28 d病死独立预测因素,且SOFA+sPD-1对脓毒症患者转归预测能力更为理想。
Objective To explore the effect of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) combined with soluble programmed death factor-1 (sPD-1) level on the prognosis of patients with sepsis. Methods A total of 86 patients with sepsis in our hospital from March 2019 to March 2021 were selected and divided into survival group (59 cases) and death group (27 cases) according to their prognosis (28-day outcome). The levels of sPD-1, inflammatory cytokines, SOFA and APACHEⅡ scores of two groups were recorded. The risk factors of 28-day mortality were analyzed. The prognostic values of SOFA+sPD-1 in patients with sepsis were analyzed by ROC curve. Results Age, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and sPD-1 levels and SOFA, APACHEⅡ scores of death group were higher than those of survival group (P＜0.05). By Logistic regression analysis, sPD-1 level, SOFA and APACHEⅡ scores were identified as independent predictors of 28-day death in patients with sepsis (P＜0.05). After combining prediction, the area under the ROC curve of SOFA+sPD-1 was the largest (0.862), and the sensitivity and specificity were 88.89% and 88.14% respectively. Conclusion In the prognosis evaluation of patients with sepsis, both sPD-1 level and SOFA score were independent predictors of 28-day mortality, and SOFA+sPD-1 was more effective in predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis.
目的 了解番禺区市桥街居民卫生服务利用和卫生服务需求现况,为城市社区卫生服务发展指明方向。方法 采用自行编制的社区居民健康需求调查问卷,通过7个社区卫生服务机构的义诊活动进行一对一问卷调查。结果 被调查的居民以女性为主,占67.2%;35岁以上居民占71.4%;初中以下文化程度占22.6%; 医疗保险覆盖率为91.2%;两周社区就诊率39.0%;患病后首选社区卫生服务机构占51.6%;调查居民的生活行为和方式总体状况较好,但健康危险因素仍普遍存在。总体对疾病预防、饮食及心脑血管的系统疾病的健康知识需求以及对社区应提供的六种基本服务需求较高。结论 针对健康服务的需求次序,合理配置卫生服务资源,促使居民合理利用社区卫生资源。
目的 回顾分析慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期并或不并肺部结核感染在感染及营养方面指标的差异性,明确结核感染对AECOPD的影响。方法 选取2013年7月—2015年6月因急性发作入住我院的COPD患者105例,根据GOLD 2011对COPD的诊断标准及卫生部2008年制定的肺结核诊断标准将其分为无结核组、稳定期组、好转期组及进展期四组。分别在入院时测定患者白细胞计数、中性粒细胞比率、总淋巴细胞计数、淋巴细胞比值、红细胞沉降率、血红蛋白浓度、血清白蛋白及C反应蛋白及体重指数。结果 各组感染指标比较,WBC、CRP两指标差异不显著(P>0.05),而无结核组相较于其他三组,NEUT%更高(F=4.004,P=0.010)、LY%及ESR更低(F/P分别为3.668/0.015和20.197/0.000);各组营养指标比较,合并有肺结核的三组,其Hb、ALB及BMI均比无结核组低,达到统计学差异(P<0.05),而TLC在各组间无差异(F=0.858,P=0.466)。结论 合并有结核感染的AECOPD患者更容易出血贫血(Hb降低)、低蛋白血症(ALB降低)、低体重(BMI降低)、中性粒细胞含量偏低(NEUT%降低)而血沉(ESR)、淋巴细胞比率(LY%)升高的情况,对出现此类情况的AECOPD患者应进行结核感染相关检查。
目的 评价现有关于干预组仅涉及不同针具针刺或联合常规针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症系统评价的方法学质量，以比较不同针具针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症的治疗效果。方法 通过CNKI（中国知网）、万方数据库、VIP（维普）、PubMed、Web of Science等数据库以及其他相关电子资源，对诊断、治疗腰椎间盘突出症的多种针灸技术进行全面的研究。使用AMSTAR2软件，对所有参与的系统性评估结果进行地分析，并根据不同的检测结果，确定文献筛选标准。通过Revman5.4和Cochrance风险偏倚工具，以及Stata16.0的网格Meta分析，挑选了3 381个满足纳入排除要求的随机对照试验。结果 以Stata 16.0统计软件制作排序图可知，杵针+电针的临床有效率SUCRA=81.6%排名第一；目测类比评分显示，银质针SUCRA（用于评估疗效的指标）=95%，排名第一。结论 根据现有的研究证据，杵针+电针以及银质针优于其他9种干预措施，但确切的结果仍需要大量的随机对照试验来证明。
Objective To evaluate the methodological quality of the existing systematic evaluation of the intervention group involving only different needle sets of acupuncture or combined with conventional acupuncture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation，in order to compare the therapeutic effect of different needle sets of acupuncture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation．Methods Through CNKI，Wanfang database，VIP，PubMed，web of science and other databases as well as other relevant resources，a variety of acupuncture techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation were comprehensively studied．Through the use of AMSTAR2 software，all participating systematic evaluation results were effectively analyzed，and according to different test results，which literature meets the requirements were determined．Through revman5.4，Cochrane risk bias tool，and grid meta-analysis of stata16.0，3 381 RCTs meeting the inclusion and exclusion requirements were selected．Results According to the ranking chart made by stata16.0 statistical software，the clinical effective rate of pestle needle + electroacupuncture ranked first with sucra=81.6%．According to the visual analogy score，the silver needle sucra=95%，ranking first．Conclusions According to the existing research evidence，pestle needle + electroacupuncture and silver needle are better than the other nine interventions，but the exact results still need a large number of randomized controlled trials to prove．
