目的 探讨动态社交行为技巧练习联合生物反馈对学龄注意缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）患儿临床症状和社会功能的影响。方法 回顾性选取我院2021年1月~2024年3月收治的81例学龄ADHD患儿作为研究对象，按照治疗方法不同分为对照组（40例）、观察组（41例），对照组接受生物反馈治疗，观察组接受动态社交行为技巧练习联合生物反馈治疗。比较两组临床疗效、临床症状、社会功能、脑电波频率[β波、θ波、感觉运动节律（SMR）波]。结果 观察组总有效率90.24%较对照组的72.50%高（P＜0.05）；治疗后观察组对抗性行为、多动-冲动、注意力不集中评分均低于对照组（P＜0.05）；治疗后观察组家庭、学习与学校、生活技能、自我管理、社交活动及风险活动评分均低于对照组（P＜0.05）；治疗后观察组β波、SMR波均高于对照组，θ波低于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 动态社交行为技巧练习联合生物反馈对学龄ADHD患儿临床疗效确切，可进一步改善患儿临床症状、社会功能。

Objective To explore the effect of dynamic social behavior skills training combined with biofeedback on clinical symptoms and social function in school-age children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods A total of 81 school-age children with ADHD admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to March 2024 were retrospectively selected as the research objects. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into control group (40 cases) and observation group (41 cases). The control group received biofeedback therapy, and the observation group received dynamic social behavior skills training combined with biofeedback therapy. The clinical efficacy, clinical symptoms, social function, brain wave frequency [β wave, θ wave, sensorimotor rhythm ( SMR ) wave] were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 90.24% higher than that of the control group (72.50%) (P<0.05). After treatment, the scores of antagonistic behavior, hyperactivity-impulsion and inattention in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the scores of family, learning and school, life skills, self-management, social activities and risk activities in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the β wave and SMR wave in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the θ wave was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Dynamic social behavior skill training combined with biofeedback has definite clinical efficacy in school-age children with ADHD, which can further improve their clinical symptoms and social functioning.

目的 探讨胰岛素抵抗对缓解期双相障碍患者转归和社会功能的影响。方法 对双相I型患者90例以及正常对照组30例进行体质量指数、空腹血糖、胰岛素等测定,计算胰岛素抵抗指数;长期治疗应答回顾标准量表评估治疗应答、大体社会功评估量表评估社会功能,分析胰岛素抵抗对双相患者转归和社会功能的影响。结果 患有2型糖尿病或胰岛素抵抗的双相障碍患者治疗应答反应差(2.50和2.93 vs 4.77,F=5.636,P<0.01;OR=6.07和4.78,P<0.01),双相发作次数多(0和0.03 vs 0.33,F=59.475,P<0.01),社会功能更差(GAF:56.90和53.23 vs 73.93,F=6.010,P<0.05;OR=1.59和4.82,P<0.01)。治疗应答、社会功能与胰岛素抵抗指数呈负相关(r=-0.383和-0.307,P<0.01)。社会功能与治疗反应、非典型抗精神病药物和药物副反应相关(r=0.467, -0.314,-0.407,P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论 共病糖尿病或胰岛素抵抗可能是双相障碍治疗抵抗、社会功能损害的一个重要的因素。

Objective To investigate the effect of insulin resistance on outcome and social function in patients with bipolar disorder at remission stage. Methods The body mass index(BMI),the levels of fasting plasma glucose,insulin and glyeosylated hemoglobin were detected in 90 BD patients without diabetes(BD group)and 30 normal controls (NC group). Alda scale was used to assess treatment response, and Global Assessment of Functioning Scale was used to assess social function. The effect of insulin resistance on outcome and social function was analyzed. Results Patients with bipolar disorder with type 2 diabetes or insulin resistance have poor response to treatment(2.50,2.93 vs 4.77,F=5.636,P<0.01;OR=6.07& 4.78,P<0.01), more recurrences (0,0.03 vs 0.33,F=59.475,P<0.01;OR=1.59&4.82,P<0.01), and worse social function (GAF:56.90,53.23 vs 73.93,F=6.010,P<0.05). Treatment response and social function were negatively correlated with insulin resistance index (r=-0.383,-0.307,P<0.01), and social function was associated with treatment response, atypical antipsychotics, and side effects (r=0.467, -0.314,-0.407,P<0.05 or P<0.01). Conclusion Diabetes mellitus or insulin resistance may be important factor in therapeutic resistance and social function to patients with bipolar disorder.

目的 探索利伯曼康复治疗对慢性精神分裂症患者社会功能的影响。方法 选取长期住院的慢性精神分裂症患者130例,随机分为研究组65例和对照组65例,研究组实施利伯曼康复治疗,在康复训练前与训练后的第1、3月末分别采用护士用住院病人观察量表(NOSIE)和住院精神病人康复疗效评定量表(IPROS)对患者进行评价。结果 患者通过利伯曼康复治疗后,NOSIE量表总积极分、社会能力、社会兴趣、个人整洁等得分有明显提高;IPROS量表的工疗情况生活能力社交能力讲究卫生能力都有较明显的提高(T、P<0.01)。结论 利伯曼康复治疗对患者的社会功能的改善有积极的意义。

Objective To explore the impacts of Lieberman rehabilitation technique on chronic schizophrenic patient's quality of life. Methods 130 patients diagnosed with chronic schizophrenia with over 5-year long hospitalization were divided into two groups randomly, with 65 samples at either study group or control group. Team to implement a lieberman rehabilitation. NOSIE and IPROS were used by nurse to assess the performance of all samples in one month after the beginning of the study and three months after the beginning study. Results After intervention, the performance of samples in study group indicated that patients had significantly higher score in NOSIE total score, social ability, social interest, individual tidiness. Patient's total negative points including irritability, mental performance, retardation and depression were decreased. IPROS living ability and social ability has improved significantly(P≤0.01). Conclusion Lieberman rehabilitation technique can improve patients'social function.