目的 评估SCORTEN评分与我国SJS/TEN患者疾病严重程度的一致性,比较单用糖皮质激素(TCS)和糖皮质激素—丙种球蛋白冲击(TCS-IVIG)联合治疗SJS/TEN的临床效果。方法 收集我院2005年6月—2015年5月住院的SJS/TEN患者,计算每例患者的SCORTEN评分,采用Hosmer-Lemeshow检验评估SCORTEN模型的预期死亡率和实际死亡率的拟合度;比较单用TCS和TCS-IVIG联合治疗的患者在疾病严重程度、住院天数、疾病控制时间和死亡率方面的差异。结果 SCORTEN模型的预期死亡率和实际死亡率之间的拟合度良好(各组P值均大于0.5);二组患者在住院天数、疾病控制时间和死亡率方面的差异没有统计学意义(P分别为0.105,0.910,0.701),但TCS-IVIG组患者的疾病严重程度显著高于TCS组(P=0.017)。结论 SCORTEN评分可以用于评估国内SJS/TEN患者的病情严重程度,并预测患者预后;与单用TCS相比,联合IVIG有助于提高重症SJS/TEN患者的救治效果。

Objectivs To evaluate the performance of SCORTEN in severity of SJS/TEN in China, and to compare the efficacy of corticosteroid therapy (TCS) and intravenous immunoglobulin combined therapy (TCS-IVIG). Methods Collected retrospectively the data of the SJS/TEN patients from June 2005 to May 2015 in our hospital. Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic were used to assess SCORTEN model calibration. And the differences between TCS group and TCS-IVIG group were compared in severity-of-illness, length of hospitalization, disease control time and mortality. Results A good calibration were found in all groups (all P＞0.5). Although the severity-of-illness in the TCS-IVIG group was significantly higher than that in the TCS group (P=0.017), there was no statistical significance between the two groups in length of hospitalization, disease control time and mortality (P=0.105, 0.910, 0.701, respectively). Conclusion SCORTEN can be used to assess the severity-of-illness in Chinese patients with SJS/TEN and to predict the prognosis. Compared with single TCS, It could improve the clinical outcomes of patients with severe SJS/TEN combined with IVIG.