目的 探讨免疫治疗联合化学治疗（化疗）对晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）患者淋巴免疫及生活质量的影响,为临床进一步治疗提供参考。方法 选择2021年6月—2023年6月天津市滨海新区大港医院收治的晚期NSCLC患者120例进行研究,按抽签法分为干预组及对照组,每组60例,对照组采取单纯化疗方案,干预组采取免疫联合化疗方案,对比两组临床疗效、药物不良反应,治疗前后免疫功能（CD3⁺、CD4⁺、CD8⁺）、糖类抗原199（CA199）、糖类抗原 125（CA125）、血清癌胚抗原（CEA）水平及健康状态调查表（QOL）评分。结果 干预组患者治疗总有效率高于对照组（68.33%>41.67%,P<0.05）;治疗后干预组患者CD3⁺、CD4⁺比例高于治疗前及对照组治疗后,CD8⁺比例低于治疗前及对照组治疗后（P<0.05）;治疗后干预组血清CA199、CA125、CEA水平均低于治疗前及对照组治疗后（P<0.05）;干预组药物不良反应发生率为16.67％,对照组为36.67％,干预组低于对照组（P<0.05）;治疗后干预组QOL各维度评分高于对照组及治疗前（P<0.05）。结论 与单纯化疗相比,免疫联合化疗治疗晚期NSCLC患者,能有效降低肿瘤标志物水平,改善患者免疫指标,减轻药物不良反应,提高患者疗效及生活质量。

Objective To explore the effect of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy on lymphatic immunity and quality of life of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer（NSCLC）,and to provide reference for further clinical treatment. Methods A total of 120 patients with NSCLC from June 2021 to June 2023 were selected and divided into observation group and control group evenly according to the method of drawing lots,control group was treated with chemotherapy,the observation group was treated with immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy,and the clinical efficacy and adverse drug reactions were compared between the two groups．Before and after treatment,immune function（CD3⁺,CD4⁺,CD8⁺）,carbohydrate antigen 199（CA199）,carbohydrate antigen 125（CA125）,serum carcinoembryonic antigen（CEA）levels and health status questionnaire（QOL-RRB- scores）were measured．Results The total effective rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group（68.33%>41.67%,P<0.05）．After treatment,the ratios of CD3⁺ and CD4⁺ in the observation group were significantly higher than those before treatment and control group after treatment,and the ratio of CD8⁺ was significantly lower than that before and after treatment in the control group（P<0.05）．After treatment,the serum levels of CA199,CA125 and CEA in the observation group were lower than those before and after treatment in the control group（P<0.05）．The incidence of adverse drug reactions was 16.67% in the observation group and 36.67% in the control group,which was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group（P<0.05）．After treatment,the QOL scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group and before treatment（P<0.05）．Conclusions Compared with chemotherapy alone,immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can effectively reduce the levels of tumor markers,improve the immune indexes of patients,reduce the adverse drug reactions,and improve the efficacy and quality of life of patients with advanced NSCLC．

目的 对晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者进行回顾性分析,探讨参一胶囊维持治疗对患者炎症因子的影响。方法 经参一胶囊联合化疗一线治疗后取得缓解或稳定的37名晚期NSCLC患者意向性分为治疗组(A组,21人)和对照组(B组,16人)。A组继续服用参一胶囊每天2次,每次20 mg,服药至疾病进展或无法耐受;B组未予特殊治疗。分别于第1 d、90 d采血,检测白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数、C反应蛋白、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素1β(IL-1β)、白细胞介素1α(IL-1α)、白细胞介素6(IL-6)和白细胞介素10(IL-10)。结果 治疗前后比较,治疗组各项炎症指标均未发生明显变化(P>0.05);而对照组的TNF-α、IL-1β、IL-6上升(P值分别为<0.001、0.032、0.001),IL-10下降(P=0.035);治疗后两组间比较,对照组TNF-α、IL-1β、IL-6上升(P值分别为<0.001、0.001、0.004),IL-10则下降(P=0.002)。两组间IL-1α及白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数、C反应蛋白无变化(P>0.05)。结论 参一胶囊维持治疗可使晚期NSCLC患者TNF-α、IL-1β及IL-6的低表达,提示调节炎症反应可能是参一胶囊维持治疗抑制NSCLC进展的机制之一。

Objective To retrospectively investigate the influence of Shenyi Capsule maintenance therapy on inflammatory factors in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods Thirty seven patients with advanced NSCLC, who had become palliative or stable after first-line treatment with combined Shenyi capsule chemotherapy, were intentionally assigned to treatment group (group A, 21 patients) and control group (group B, 16 patients). Shenyi capsule was given to group A (20mg p.o., bid) until appearance of deterioration or intolerance, while no special treatment was given to group B. Leukocytes, neutrophils, C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β(IL-1β), interleukin-1α (IL-1α),interleukin-6(IL-6) and interleukin-10(IL-10) were tested by blood specimens taken respectively on 1st day and 90th day. Results There were no statistical differences (P>0.05) between the level of inflammatory factors on 1th day and 90th day in treatment group. In control group, however, TNF-α、IL-1β and IL-6 increased (P<0.001, P=0.032、P=0.001 respectively) and IL-10 decreased significantly (P=0.035). Furthermore, the level of TNF-α、IL-1β and IL-6 in treatment group were also higher (P<0.001, P=0.001, P=0.004 respectively), while IL-10 was lower (P=0.002)than control group on 90th day. There were no statistical differences(P>0.05)between the two groups in the level of IL-1α, leukocyte, neutrophils or C reactive protein on 1th day and 90th day. Conclusion Shenyicapsule maintenance therapy could lower the expression of TNF-α、IL-1β and IL-6 in patients with advanced NSCLC, which indicates that the regulation of inflammatory reaction may be one of the mechanisms of inhibition from NSCLC progression in Shenyi capsule maintenance therapy.

       目的   探讨免疫治疗联合化学治疗（化疗）对晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）患者淋巴免疫及生活质量的影响，为临床进一步治疗提供参考。方法  选择2021年6月—2023年6月天津市滨海新区大港医院收治的晚期NSCLC患者120例进行研究，按抽签法分为干预组及对照组，每组60例，对照组采取单纯化疗方案，干预组采取免疫联合化疗方案，对比两组临床疗效、药物不良反应，治疗前后免疫功能（CD3⁺ 、CD4⁺ 、CD8⁺ ）、糖类抗原199（CA199）、糖类抗原 125（CA125）、血清癌胚抗原（CEA）水平及健康状态调查表（QOL）评分。结果  干预组患者治疗总有效率高于对照组（68.33%＞41.67%，P＜0.05）；治疗后干预组患者CD3⁺ 、CD4⁺ 比例高于治疗前及对照组治疗后，CD8⁺ 比例低于治疗前及对照组治疗后（P＜0.05）；治疗后干预组血清CA199、CA125、CEA水平均低于治疗前及对照组治疗后（P＜0.05）；干预组药物不良反应发生率为16.67％，对照组为36.67％，干预组低于对照组（P＜0.05）；治疗后干预组QOL各维度评分高于对照组及治疗前（P＜0.05）。结论  与单纯化疗相比，免疫联合化疗治疗晚期NSCLC患者，能有效降低肿瘤标志物水平，改善患者免疫指标，减轻药物不良反应，提高患者疗效及生活质量。

       Objective  To explore the effect of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy on lymphatic immunity and quality of life of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer（NSCLC），and to provide reference for further clinical treatment．Methods  A total of 120 patients with NSCLC from June 2021 to June 2023 were selected and divided into observation group and control group evenly according to the method of drawing lots，control group was treated with chemotherapy，the observation group was treated with immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy，and the clinical efficacy and adverse drug reactions were compared between the two groups．Before and after treatment，immune function（CD3⁺ ，CD4⁺ ，CD8⁺ ），carbohydrate antigen 199（CA199），carbohydrate antigen 125（CA125），serum carcinoembryonic antigen（CEA）levels and health status questionnaire（QOL-RRB- scores）were measured．Results The total effective  rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group（68.33%＞41.67%，P＜0.05）．After treatment，the ratios of CD3⁺  and CD4⁺  in the observation group were significantly higher than those before treatment and control group after treatment，and the ratio of CD8⁺  was significantly lower than that before and after treatment in the control group（P＜0.05）．After treatment，the serum levels of CA199，CA125 and CEA in the observation group were lower than those before and after treatment in the control group（P＜0.05）．The incidence of adverse drug  reactions was 16.67% in the observation group and 36.67% in the control group，which was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group（P＜0.05）．After treatment，the QOL scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group and before treatment（P＜0.05）．Conclusions  Compared with chemotherapy alone，immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can effectively reduce the levels of tumor markers，improve the immune indexes of patients，reduce the adverse drug reactions，and improve the efficacy and quality of life of patients with advanced NSCLC．