《广州医药》
点击关注官方服务号追踪稿件状态

【重要服务提醒】《广州医药》杂志服务号已上线稿件查询功能

各位作者、审稿专家:
本刊官方微信服务号新增稿件状态查询服务,无需反复登录投稿系统,微信即可随时查看审稿进度、修回通知、录用结果,稿件更新实时推送提醒,同步接收期刊征稿、学术资讯。

操作方式

微信搜索关注广州医药杂志服务号 → 点击菜单栏「绑定账号」→ 输入投稿邮箱完成账号关联;请关闭微信消息免打扰,避免遗漏稿件通知。

《广州医药》编辑部

广州医药杂志服务号
论著

循证护理干预在肺功能检查中对检查准确性的影响

The influence of evidence-based nursing intervention on the accuracy of pulmonary function test

:115-118
 
目的 探讨循证护理干预在肺功能检查中对检查准确性的影响。方法 选取行肺功能检查患者80例,随机分为2组,分别记录为观察组40例和对照组40例,分别实施循证护理干预和常规护理干预,比较两组患者肺功能检查时间、肺功能检查结果及护理满意度。结果 观察组患者平均肺功能检查时间短于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者肺功能检查正常率高于对照组;且观察组患者对护理服务的满意度高于对照组,组间对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对行肺功能检查的患者实施循证护理干预效果显著,有利于缩短患者肺功能检查时间,并可提高检查的准确率,且有利于改善护患关系,值得在临床上推广应用。
Objective To investigate the influence of evidence-based nursing intervention on the accuracy of the examination in pulmonary function test. Methods 80 cases of patients with lung function examination, were randomly divided into 2 groups, were recorded in 40 cases of observation group and control group 40 cases, respectively. The implementation of evidence-based nursing intervention and routine nursing intervention were taken, to compare times of patients with pulmonary function test, pulmonary function test results and nursing satisfaction in two groups. Results In the observation group the average lung function examination time was shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05); normal pulmonary function tests was higher than that of the control group; satisfaction with nursing service was higher than the control group, there was statistical significance the differences between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion The pulmonary function test for patients with the implementation of evidence-based nursing intervention has significant effect. It can shorten the time in patients with pulmonary function examination, improve the inspection accuracy, and improve the relationship between nurses and patients, it is worthy of clinical application.
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号