目的 探讨河源地区机采血小板固定献血者血小板抗原系统的基因多态性特征,为建立本地区机采血小板供血者库奠定基础。方法 采用PCR-SSP方法对100例机采血小板固定献血者进行血小板抗原HPA1～17系统基因分型。结果 HPA1～17基因中成多态性分布的等位基因是HPA2a、HPA3a、HPA5a、HPA15a,其频率分别为0.96、0.49、0.99、0.515。HPA-2、HPA-3、HPA-5、HPA-15系统存在aa、ab、bb 三种表型。HPA1a、HPA4a、HPA6a-14a、HPA16a-17a基因频率为1,呈单线性分布,未发现b基因。结论 河源地区血小板HPA-3系统不配合率最高(0.420),HPA-15系统次之。建立本地区机采血小板供血者库,为患者提供HPA相合的血小板,对减少临床血小板输注无效的发生具有重要意义。

Objective To study the polymorphism of human platelet antigens in fixed apheresis platelet donors in Heyuan area and to lay a foundation for the establishment of platelets donor bank. Methods PCR-SSP method was used to analyze HPA 1～17 genotype in 100 fixed platelet donors. Results The highest numbers of heterozygotes were HPA2a,HPA3a,HPA5a and HPA15a,with frequencies of 0.96,0.49,0.99 and 0.515,respectively. The frequencies of HPA1a,HPA4a,HPA6a-14a and HPA16a-17a genes were 1,which showed a single linear distribution. Conclusion HPA-3 system were the highest mismatch rate (0.420),followed by HPA-15 system. It is great significance to establish a local platelet donor bank and provide HPA compatible platelets for patients.

目的 分析葡萄糖酸钙口服液在预防单采献血不良反应特别是心血管不良反应的价值。方法 随机选取3 504例在我中心单采血小板献血者作此次研究对象,将抽取对象分为比对组(n=1 728)和探析组(n=1 776),对探析组献血者进行血小板采集前为其提供葡萄糖酸钙口服液,比对组献血者不接受任何预防措施,献血过程中对献血者进行动态血压检测及动态心电图检测。结果 对比组共发生不良反应为278例(16.08%):其中全身性不良反应无晕厥78例(4.51%);全身不良反应晕厥18例(1.04%);单采相关性的不良反应中的枸橼酸盐反应为182例(10.53%);未见溶血反应和过敏反应。探析组共发生不良反应为155例(8.72%):其中全身性不良反应无晕厥54例(3.04%);全身不良反应晕厥20例(1.12%);单采相关性的不良反应中的枸橼酸盐反应为85例(4.78%);未见溶血反应和过敏反应。探析组单采相关性的不良反应中的枸橼酸盐反应显著减少。2组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。比对组与探析组中,出现血压异常48例(2.78%)和12例(0.68%);心电图异常的89例(5.15%)和32例(1.80%);心率异常112例(6.48%)和38(2.14%)。为探析组的心血管不良反应的发生率低于比对组献血者,2组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 在献血者单采血小板为其提供葡萄糖酸钙口服液能够有效减少心血管不良反应,降低单采血小板不良反应发生率。

目的 探讨影响初次机采血小板献血者再次捐献的相关因素,为制定机采献血者保留策略提供依据。方法 选择2016年1月1日—2016年12月31日在广州血液中心首次成功捐献机采血小板的13 899例献血者为研究对象,分析每个献血者献血时性别、年龄、文化程度、是否发生献血不良反应与下一年度是否再次捐献机采血小板的相关性。结果 男性献血者再次捐献率(10.68%)高于女性献血者再次捐献率(8.94%),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01);献血者年龄18～25岁组再次捐献率最高为12.86%,46～60岁组再次捐献率最低为6.46%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.001);献血者文化程度高中或职中组再次捐献率最高为11.23%,本科或以上组再次捐献率最低为8.94%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.001);未发生不良反应献血者再次捐献率(10.37%)高于发生不良反应献血者再次捐献率(5.56%),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。结论 男性、年龄较小、文化程度较低和未发生献血不良反应的献血者更愿意返回再次捐献机采血小板,对这部分献血者采取针对性保留措施,有利于建立起一支固定捐献机采血小板的献血者队伍。

Objective To explore the related factors affecting the re-donation of the first apheresis platelet donors, and to provide a basis for the retention strategy. Methods A total of 13 899 blood donors who successfully donated apheresis platelets for the first time in Guangzhou Blood Center from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 were selected as subjects. The correlation among gender, age, education level, adverse reactions of blood donation and whether platelet collection was re-donated in the next year was analyzed. Results Re-donation rate of male blood donors (10.68%) was higher than that of female blood donors (8.94%). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). Re-donation rate of blood donors aged 18～25 was the highest 12.86%, and that of 46～60 was the lowest 6.46%. The difference was significant (P<0.001). Re-donation rate of high school or vocational college blood donors was the highest 11.23%. The lowest re-donation rate was 8.94% in the undergraduate group or above, and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.001). The re-donation rate of donors without adverse reactions (10.37%) was higher than that of donors with adverse reactions (5.56%). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion Male, younger, less educated and no adverse reactions to blood donation are more willing to return to donate platelet again. Targeting these donors for reserve measure will conducive to the establishment of a fixed platelet donor team.

目的 分析2016—2018年度广州市单采血小板报废的主要原因,并探讨如何降低单采血小板报废率。方法 统计2016—2018年度广州市单采血小板的采集量、报废数量和报废率等相关数据,分析报废原因,提出相应改进措施。结果 2016—2018年广州血液中心单采血小板总报废率为1.13%,三年的报废率逐年下降。报废的最主要原因为血液感染因子筛查不合格或ALT异常,占总报废率64.44%;其次分别为血量不足(占比14.4%)、采血耗材/血袋/热合口漏(占比11.01%)等。结论 我中心单采血小板报废率虽逐年下降,但仍需加强献血前宣传,动员更多的健康适龄公民参加无偿献血,同时重视采前血液感染因子的筛查工作、采血前及采血过程的护理干预、设备维护保养和产品处理能力的培训,进一步有效降低血液报废率。

Objective To analyze the main causes of apheresis platelets discarding in Guangzhou from 2016 to 2018, and discuss how to reduce the discarding rate. Methods Collected the data of apheresis platelets collection, the discarding number and the discarding rate in Guangzhou from 2016 to 2018,to analysis the reasons of apheresis platelets discarding and introducing improvement measures. Results From 2016 to 2018, the total discarding rate of apheresis platelets collected from Guangzhou Blood Center was 1.13%. In the three years,the discarding rate declined year by year.The main reasons for apheresis platelets discarding were the result of blood infection factor test or ALT was not qualified, accounting for 64.44% of the total scrapping rate. Then followed by insufficient blood volume (14.4%) and Blood consumables/blood bags/heat closure leakage (11.01%). Conclusion Although the rate of apheresis platelet discarding in Guangzhou Blood Center is decreasing year by year, we still need to enhance blood donation propaganda, mobilize more healthy citizens to participate in blood donation, and pay attention to the screening of blood infection factors before blood collection, nursing blood donor before and during blood collection, and training of ability in equipment maintenance and product handling, so as to further effectively reduce the rate of blood discarding.

目的 探讨机采血小板献血者流失原因,为建立一支稳固的机采血小板献血者队伍提供参考。方法 选择2009年1月1日—2012年12月31日河源市中心血站首次机采血小板献血者共382例为研究对象,根据其首次机采血小板献血后3年内是否再次参加机采血小板献血分为实验组和对照组,分别对研究对象进行电话回访调查。结果 3年内未再次参加血小板献血流失者118例,总流失率为30.89%;不同献血动机组流失率差异有统计学意义 (χ²= 18.552,P=0.000),其中动机不明确组流失率(52.49%)最高,寻求社会荣誉组流失率(15.79%)最低。发生过献血反应组(63.64%)流失率显著高于未发生献血反应组流失率(26.63%),两组间差异有统计学意义(χ²=8.501,P=0.004);对献血过程不满意组流失率(39.77%)显著高于满意组流失率(28.23%),两组间差异有统计学意义(χ²=16.413,P=0.000);认为机采时间过长组机采血小板献血者流失率(49.40%)显著高于不认为机采时间过长组流失率为(25.75%),两组间差异有统计学意义(χ²=17.014,P=0.000)。健康状况(体检结果)不合格组流失率(43.84%)显著高于合格组流失率(27.83%),两组间差异有统计学意义(χ²=9.022,P=0.030)。媒体(或网络)负面的宣传与献血者是否方便对机采血小板献血者流失率的影响不显著(χ²=1.579,P=0.209;χ²=2.130,P=0.144)。结论 机采血小板献血者流失主要与献血动机、献血过程感受以及自身健康等因素有关。