目的 检验婴儿孤独症观察量表中文版（AOSI）临床应用的灵敏度与特异度,评价其临床应用效果。方法 随机抽取1岁时曾在清远市妇幼保健院行AOSI评估,于2~3岁时诊断为孤独症谱系障碍（ASD）的48例患儿为ASD组,诊断为正常发展的46例幼儿作为对照组。比较两组患儿的18个条目得分和总分,采用受试者操作特征（ROC）曲线计算AOSI的特异度、灵敏度、阳性预测值与阴性预测值,并判断AOSI的最佳诊断（阳性）分界值;分析AOSI评估结果与《精神障碍诊断与统计手册（第5版）》（DSM-5）中ASD诊断标准的一致性。结果 两组研究对象性别、年龄比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。ASD组各条目得分和总分均高于对照组,且差异具有统计学意义（P<0.01）。AOSI的曲线下面积（AUC）为1.00（P<0.01）,95%置信区间为（1.00,1.00）。不同阳性分界线的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及一致性相比较,当约登指数等于1.00时AOSI的最佳诊断（阳性截断值）界线为9分时,其上述值均为1.00。AOSI评估结果与DSM-5中ASD的诊断标准完全相一致（Kappa=1,P<0.01）。结论 AOSI应用于评估1岁的婴儿,当取9分为诊断界值时,具有高度的灵敏度与特异度,能较好地预测该婴儿在2~3岁时是否患ASD;AOSI是婴儿期ASD筛查的重要工具,其评估结果可作为ASD高危儿早期干预的证据和ASD的辅助诊断工具,适合于临床推广应用。

Objective To test the sensitivity and specificity of the Chinese version of the Autism Observation Scale for Infants（AOSI）in clinical application and evaluate its clinical application effect．Methods Forty-eight children with autism spectrum disorder（ASD）diagnosed at the age of 2 to 3 years who had undergone AOSI evaluation in Qingyuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital at the age of 1 year（2021）were randomly selected as the ASD group,and 46 children with normal development were randomly selected as the control group．The scores of 18 items and total scores of the two groups of subjects were compared．The specificity,sensitivity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of AOSI were calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curve（ROC）,and the best diagnostic（positive）cut-off value of AOSI was confirmed．The consistency of AOSI evaluation results with the ASD diagnostic criteria in DSM-5 were compared．Results There was no statistically significant difference in genders or age between two groups（P>0.05）．The scores of each item and total scores in the ASD group were significantly higher than those in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant（P<0.01）．The area under the curve of AOSI（AUC=1.00,P<0.01）had a 95% confidence interval of（1.00,1.00）．Comparing the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and consistency of different positive boundary points,when the Youden index was equal to 1.00,the optimal diagnostic（positive cut-off value）boundary for AOSI was 9 points,and all of the above values were 1.00． The AOSI evaluation results were completely consistent with the diagnostic criteria for ASD in DSM-5（Kappa=1,P<0.01）．Conclusions AOSI has high sensitivity and specificity when it is used to evaluate the 1-year-old infant．When “9 points” is taken as the diagnostic threshold,it can better predict whether the infant has ASD at the age of 2~3 years．AOSI is an important tool for screening ASD in infancy．Its evaluation results can be used as evidence for early intervention of high-risk infants with ASD and as a assisting tool to diagnosis ASD,which is suitable for clinical application．

目的 检验家庭睡眠习惯调查(FISH)在评估孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)患儿睡眠评估中的信度和效度。方法 随机抽取在清远市妇幼保健院儿童语言行为科干预的199例2~6岁ASD共患睡眠障碍患儿,其照顾者同时完成FISH和儿童睡眠习惯问卷(CSHQ),2周后再次同时完成上述两个问卷,以检验FISH的信度和效度。结果 验证性因素分析的结果表明,五因素模型拟合良好(χ²=79.05,df=44,χ²/df=1.80, P<0.001,SRMR=0.06,GFI=0.94,IFI=0.89,RMSEA=0.06),总量表及各分量表有较高的内部一致性信度(0.71~0.77)和重测信度(0.79~0.88)。FISH的白天习惯分别与CSHQ的入睡延迟、夜醒呈负相关,入睡前习惯分别与CSHQ的睡眠抵触、睡眠焦虑、白天睡眠呈负相关,睡眠常规分别与CSHQ的睡眠抵触、入睡延迟、睡眠焦虑呈负相关,睡前父母行为分别与CSHQ的睡眠抵触、睡眠焦虑呈负相关,总分与CSHQ总分呈负相关,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 FISH具有较好的信度和效度,可作为ASD患儿睡眠习惯的评估工具。

Objective To test the reliability and validity of the famity inveritory of sleep habits(FISH) in the sleep assessment among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods A random sample of 199 children with ASD and sleep disorders intervened in the Children's Language and Behavior Department of Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Qingyuan City were selected, their caregivers completed the FISH and the children's sleep habit questionnaire(CSHQ) at the same time, and completed the above two questionnaires again 2 weeks later to test the reliability and validity of the FISH. Results The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the five-factor model fits well (χ²=79.05, df=44, χ²/df=1.80, P<0.001, SRMR=0.06, GFI=0.94, IFI =0.89, RMSEA=0.06), the total scale and each subscale had high internal consistent reliability (0.71~0.77) and test-retest reliability (0.79~0.88). The daytime habits of FISH were negatively correlated with sleep delay and waking up at night of CSHQ respectively, the habits before sleep of FISH were negatively correlated with sleep conflict, sleep anxiety and daytime sleep of CSHQ respectively, the sleep routine of FISH was negatively correlated with sleep conflict, sleep delay and sleep anxiety of CSHQ respectively, the parents' behavior before sleep of FISH was negatively correlated with sleep conflict and sleep anxiety of CSHQ respectively, and the total score of FISH was negatively correlated with CSHQ, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusions The FISH had good reliability and validity, and can be used as an assessment tool for children with ASD.