目的 调查住院老年患者因经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管（PICC）而引发的血栓情况，并分析其影响因素，为老年患者置入PICC产生的相关性血栓（PICC-CRT）和症状性血栓的评估与干预提供借鉴。方法 在2023年1月—2023年12月期间，选取广州市第一人民医院接受PICC置管的317例住院老年患者。采用包括患者一般情况调查表、运动功能评定、肌力检测、 Barthel指数评定、Padua评分等多种工具进行综合评估。采用多因素 Logistic 回归构建 PICC-CRT 及症状性血栓的预测模型，并应用逐步回归法优化变量筛选过程。模型性能通过 ROC 曲线进行评估。结果 去除临床资料不完整的患者40例，最终纳入277例患者的完整资料，其中123例患者出现了PICC-CRT，发生率为44.40%（123/277）。血栓分级中，I级78例，Ⅱ级37例，Ⅲ级8例。无症状血栓83例，占67.48%，发生率29.96%（83/277）；症状性血栓40例，占32.52 %，发生率14.44%（40/277）。单因素分析联合多因素Logistic回归显示，卒中史、凝血酶原时间（PT）、导管留置时间是住院老年患者PICC-CRT的关键因素（P＜0.05），预测模型ROC曲线下面积为0.719；置管史、恶性肿瘤史、导管留置时间、置管后并发症数量是住院老年患者PICC症状性血栓的独立影响因素（P＜0.05），预测模型ROC曲线下面积为0.812。结论 文章总结了PICC-CRT和症状性血栓独特的影响因素，基于关键因素构建了预测模型预测其发生，为护理人员预防PICC-CRT和症状性血栓的发生提供了参考。

   Objective To explore the incidence of thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheter（PICC）placement in hospitalized elderly patients and to analyze its influencing factors，in order to provide a reference for the assessment and prevention of PICC-catheter related thrombosis（PICC-CRT）and symptomatic thrombosis in this population．Methods A total of 317 elderly inpatients who underwent PICC placement at a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou between January and December 2023 were enrolled．Comprehensive assessments were conducted using general patient information forms，motor function evaluation，muscle strength testing，Barthel Index，and Padua score．Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to construct predictive models for PICC-CRT and symptomatic thrombosis，with variable selection optimized via stepwise regression．Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic（ROC）curve analysis．Results After excluding 40 patients with incomplete clinical data，277 cases were included in the final analysis．Among them，123 patients developed PICC-CRT，with an incidence rate of 44.40%（123/277）．Thrombosis was graded as Grade I in 78 cases，Grade II in 37 cases，and Grade III in 8 cases．Asymptomatic thrombosis occurred in 83 cases（29.96%），accounting for 67.48% of PICC-CRT；symptomatic thrombosis occurred in 40 cases（14.44%），accounting for 32.52%．Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses identified history of stroke，prothrombin time（PT），and catheter dwell time as key risk factors for PICC-CRT（P＜0.05），with the area under the curve（AUC）of 0.719．History of catheterization，malignancy，catheter dwell time，and number of post-catheterization complications were independent predictors of symptomatic thrombosis（P＜0.05），with an AUC of 0.812．Conclusions This study identified distinct risk factors for PICC-CRT and symptomatic thrombosis in elderly inpatients．Predictive models based on key variables may provide useful references for clinical staff in preventing the occurrence of PICC-related and symptomatic thrombosis．

通过筛查和早期发现,可以降低结直肠癌（CRC）的发病率,有效切除肿瘤病变可以降低CRC的病死率。虽然对CRC的危险因素、发病机制和前体病变的了解已经取得进展,但最近年轻人群CRC发病率升高,原因尚不清楚。在过去十年中,出现了多种侵入性、半侵入性和非侵入性筛查方式。目前对结肠镜检查质量的重视提高了筛查的有效性,人工智能等影像新技术在肿瘤检测中的作用正在迅速显现。而且,CRC有效干预措施,如保肛治疗新术式、靶向治疗及免疫治疗领域的新进展,被证明可以提高CRC患者的生存率。该文旨在总结目前国内外CRC筛查方式和指南的证据,并综述CRC治疗领域的进展。

The incidence of colorectal cancer（CRC）can be reduced through screening and early detection．Effective resection of tumor lesions reduces mortality from CRC．Although progress has been made in understanding the risk factors,pathogenesis and precursor lesions of CRC,the reasons for the recent increase in the incidence of CRC in young adults are largely unknown．A variety of invasive,semi-invasive and non-invasive screening modalities have emerged in the last decade．The current emphasis on the quality of colonoscopy has improved the effectiveness of screening,and the role of new imaging technologies such as artificial intelligence in tumor detection is rapidly emerging．Moreover,there are effective interventions for CRC,such as new surgical modalities for anal preservation therapy,and new advances in the field of targeted therapy and immunotherapy,which have been shown to improve the survival rate of CRC．The aim of this article is to summarize the current evidence on CRC screening modalities and guidelines both nationally and internationally,and to provide an overview of advances in the field of CRC treatment．

目的 探索干预因素对4~12岁孤独症谱系障碍（ASD）患儿社交反应的影响,为开展ASD患儿的早期干预提供参考。方法 选取于2020年1月—2023年3月在清远市妇幼保健院儿童神经与发育中心康复干预的ASD患儿,采用社交反应量表（SRS）对患儿进行社交行为评估,采用自编一般情况问卷对家长进行问卷调查,调查内容包括患儿的基本情况（性别、共患病情况、干预时长、上学情况等）。结果 202例ASD患儿中,男性患儿162例（80.2%）,女性40例（19.8%）,性别对社交反应的影响比较差异无统计学意义（t=2.969,P>0.05）。共患病方面,无共患病的ASD患儿与共患智力发育障碍及注意缺陷多动障碍的患儿相比,其SRS得分差异有统计学意义（F=6.920,P<0.05）。在上学情况方面,普通学校就读的患儿与特殊学校及未上学的患儿相比,其SRS得分差异有统计学意义（F=3.823,P<0.05）,但在特殊学校就读的患儿与未上学的患儿相比,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。在干预时长方面,干预≥1年与干预<1年及未干预的患儿比较,其SRS得分更低,差异有统计学意义（F=4.477,P<0.05）,但干预<1年与未干预患儿相比,两者差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 ASD患儿中,是否患有其他无共患病、上学情况、干预时长会影响其社交反应;存在共患疾病的ASD患儿社交反应表现更差;相较于就读特殊教育机构和未上学的患儿,就读于普通学校的ASD患儿社交障碍程度更轻;干预时间越长,其社交障碍程度也越轻。

Objective To explore the impact of intervention factors on social response in children with autism spectrum disorder（ASD）aged 4—12,and to provide reference for early intervention in children with ASD. Methods Children with ASD who underwent rehabilitation intervention at the Children's Neurology and Development Center of Qingyuan Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2020 to March 2023 were selected．The social behavior of the children was evaluated using the Social Response Scale（SRS）,and the parents were surveyed using a self-made general situation questionnaire．The survey content included the basic information of the children（gender,comorbidity,intervention duration,and school attendance,etc．）. Results Among the 202 cases of ASD,162 were male（80.2%）and 40 were female（19.8%）．There was no statistically significant difference in the impact of gender on social response（t=2.969,P>0.05）．In terms of comorbidities,there was a statistically significant difference in SRS scores between ASD children without comorbidities and those with comorbidities such as intellectual development disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder（F=6.920,P<0.05）．In terms of school attendance,there was a statistically significant difference in SRS scores between children enrolled in regular schools and those who attended special schools and those who did not attend school（F=3.823,P<0.05）,but there was no statistically significant difference between children enrolled in special schools and those who did not attend school（P>0.05）．In terms of intervention duration,compared with children with intervention≥1 year and those with intervention<1 year and no intervention,the SRS score was lower and the difference was statistically significant（F=4.477,P<0.05）．However,compared with children with intervention<1 year and those without intervention,the difference was not statistically significant（P>0.05）. Conclusions No comorbidities,attending regular schools,and intervention duration≥1 year are positive factors that affect social response．Children with ASD who have comorbidities have poorer social response performance;compared to children who attend special education institutions and those who do not attend school,children with ASD who attend regular schools have lower levels of social impairment;the longer the intervention time,the lighter the degree of social impairment．