目的 探讨不同入路显微手术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血的效果。方法 将我院2017年1月—2021年3月期间98例患者分组,按照随机数字表法分为对照组49例,给予颞叶皮层入路显微手术治疗,观察组49例给予经外侧裂入路显微手术治疗,观察2组预后状态、术后情况、日常生活能力及并发症发生情况。结果 术后半年,观察组预后状况优良率(81.63%)高于对照组(59.18%,P<0.05);观察组血肿消除率(95.92%)大于对照组(81.63%,P<0.05),2组手术时间[观察组(141.22±20.15)min,对照组(134.49±22.58)min]对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组日常生活能力优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组并发症(14.28%)与对照组对比无统计学意义(10.20%,P>0.05)。结论 相较于颞叶皮层入路,外侧裂入路下显微手术治疗基底节区高血压脑出血患者对血肿清除效果更佳,以此提高手术预后及生活能力,不会增加手术时间及术后并发症发生情况。

目的 比较分析神经内镜和常规开颅手术在治疗高血压脑出血时的优劣。方法 回顾性分析我院神经外科2015年12月1日—2017年12月31日收治的60例高血压脑出血患者,根据治疗术式的不同,分为对照组和观察组,各30例。对照组行常规开颅手术,观察组给予神经内镜治疗,通过对比两组患者的手术时长、术中出血量、血肿清除率、住院时间、术后并发症及术后6个月随访效果,分析两组优劣。结果 观察组手术时长短于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组血肿清除率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组术后并发症（颅内感染、肺部感染）发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,而两组再次出血及死亡率差异均有统计学意义（P>0.05）;观察组患者术后预后效果优于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 神经内镜在治疗高血压脑出血时对比常规开颅手术具有显著缩短手术时长及住院时间,提高血肿清除率,减少术中出血,降低颅内及肺部感染率等优势,值得临床推广应用。

Objective To compare and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of neuroendoscopy and conventional craniotomy in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods 60 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage admitted to our hospital from December 1,2015 to December 31,2017 were divided into the control group and the observation group,each with 30 cases. The control group underwent conventional craniotomy,and the observation group underwent neuroendoscopic treatment. The length of operation,intraoperative blood loss,hematoma clearance,length of hospital stay,postoperative complications,and follow-up after 6 months were compared between the two groups, to analysis the advantages and disadvantages of both groups. Results The duration of operation in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group （P<0.05）. The intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was less than that in the control group （P<0.05）;The hematoma clearance rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group （P<0.05）;The incidence of postoperative complications （intracranial infection,lung infection） in the observation group was lower than that of the control group （P<0.05）. There was no statistically significant in rebleeding and mortality between the two groups （P>0.05）. The prognosis of the observation group was better than that of the control group. In the control group,the difference was statistically significant （P<0.05）. Conclusion Neuroendoscope in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage compared with conventional craniotomy may shorten the length of operation and hospital stay,improve hematoma clearance rate,reduce intraoperative bleeding,reduce intracranial and pulmonary infection and other advantages. It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

目的 探讨小骨窗显微手术不同手术时机对高血压脑出血患者疗效及神经功能的影响。方法 选取我院2014年5月—2016年5月收治的80例高血压脑出血患者作为研究对象,脑出血量约30～40 mL,根据出血到手术时间不同分为两组,每组40例。从出血到手术时间<6 h者为超早期作为观察组,出血到手术时间处于6~24 h间者为早期作为对照组,比较两组患者治疗后1个月GOS(格拉斯哥预后)优良率,治疗后3周、6周的斯堪的纳维亚(SSS)评分,治疗后3个月、6个月的生存质量评分及治疗后的生存情况、再出血情况。结果 观察组治疗后1个月GOS优良率为77.50%,相对于对照组明显上升(P<0.05);观察组治疗后3周、6周的SSS评分较对照组明显降低(P<0.01);观察组治疗后3个月、6个月的生存质量评分较对照组明显升高(P<0.01);两组治疗后的生存率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),再出血率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 对高血压脑出血患者在超早期行小骨窗显微手术可提高疗效,明显改善患者神经功能,提高生活质量及生存率,值得临床推广。

Objective To investigate the curative effects of microsurgical treatment with small bone flap craniotomy in patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage and on their nerve function in different timing of surgery. Methods To select 80 cases of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage in our hospital from May 2014 to May 2016 as the research object. The amount of cerebral hemorrhage of the patients was about 30-40 mL. According to the different time of bleeding, they were divided into two groups, 40 cases in each group. The super early period that the time from bleeding to operation was less than 6 h was regarded as the observation group, and the early period that the time from bleeding to operation is during 6~24 h was regarded as the control group. To compare the GOS (Glasgow outcome) excellent rate of patients in two groups in 1 month after treatment, the Scandinavia (SSS) score in 3 weeks and 6 weeks after treatment, and the quality of life score and survival and re-bleeding condition after treatment in 3 months and 6 months. Results Compared with the control group, the GOS excellent rate in the observation group in 1 month after treatment was 77.50% which increased significantly (P<0.05); the SSS score in the observation group in 3 weeks and 6 weeks after treatment was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.01); The quality of life score in the observation group in 3 months and 6 months after treatment was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.01); There was statistically significant difference in survival rate between the two groups after treatment (P<0.05), and the re-bleeding rate showed no significant difference (P>0.05). Conclusion The curative effects of microsurgical treatment with small bone flap craniotomy on patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage is significant, which can improve the patients' neurological function, the life quality and survival rate, thus it is worthy of clinical promotion.