目的 探讨罗伊适应模式对肺癌患者术后生活质量的影响。方法 将2012年3月—2015年7月来我院就诊的178例肺癌术后患者,随机分为试验组85例和对照组93例;对照组患者按护理常规进行护理,试验组在常规护理基础上给予罗伊适应模式护理干预;出院时分别比较两组患者住院适应性、治疗依从性、病人满意度及患者生活质量评分。结果 试验组住院适应率为87.1%(74例),对照组住院适应率为66.7%(62例),两组差异有显著性(P<0.01);试验组治疗依从性优良率为88.2%(75例)、对照组治疗依从性优良率72.0%(67例),两组差异有显著性(P<0.01);试验组患者满意度为89.4%(76例),高于对照组患者满意度73.1%(68例),两组差异有显著性(P<0.01);试验组生活质量评分,总体健康得分(74.1±8.3)高于对照组(56.7±5.9),且差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 罗伊适应模式护理干预,可以提高肺癌患者手术后的住院适应性、治疗依从性及病人满意度,显著改善患者生活质量,在临床推广罗伊适应模式护理干预具有现实意义。

Objective To investigate　the effect of Roy adaptation model on quality of life in patients for lung cancer after surgery. Methods 178 cases of　patients with lung cancer after surgery operation　were randomly divided into observation groups(85 cases) and control groups(93 cases). The control group was treated with routine nursing care and the observation group was treated on the basis of routine nursing care plus Roy adaptation model nursing interventions. When the two groups were compared in patients hospitalized and discharged adaptability, treatment compliance, patient satisfaction and patient quality of life score. Results Hospitalization adaptation in the observation group was 87.1%(74 cases) and control group was 66.7%(67 cases). There was statistically significant difference between two groups(P<0.01); Excellent treatment compliance of observation group was 88.2%(75 cases) and control group was 72.0%(67 cases). There was statistically significant difference between two groups(P<0.01); the observation group patient satisfaction were 89.4%(76 cases), it was higher than 73.1%(68 cases) of control group. There was statistically significant difference between two groups(P<0.01); quality of life in general health score(74.1±8.3) in the observation group was higher than that of control group(56.7±5.9),and there was statistically significant difference between two groups(P<0.01). Conclusion Roy adaptation model nursing intervention may improve the adaptability hospitalized the patients with lung cancer after surgery, treatment compliance and the patient satisfaction, and significantly improve the quality of life of patients. It is worthy of promotion clinically.

目的 探讨体外循环手术前后患者血清HMGB₁、CK、CK-MB、LDH、LD₁、AST水平变化及意义。方法 采用ELISA法检测57例体外循环患者手术前后血清HMGB₁表达水平,采用临床常规方法检测血清中CK、CK-MB、LDH、LD₁、AST水平。对体外循环手术前后血清HMGB1表达水平与CK、CK-MB、LDH、LD₁、AST的水平进行比较与相关分析。结果 体外循环手术患者HMGB₁、CK、CK-MB、LDH、LD₁、AST水平在手术后0.5小时、24小时、48小时、72小时均高于手术前(P<0.05);HMGB₁、CK、CK-MB、LD₁、AST水平在手术后24小时达高峰,LDH水平高峰出现于手术后48小时,其他各指标渐渐下降。体外循环手术阻断时间延长,则HMGB₁、CK、CK-MB、LDH、LD₁、AST水平升高。体外循环手术后患者血清中HMGB₁表达水平与CK、CK-MB、LDH、AST指标呈正相关关系(P<0.05)。结论 体外循环手术后患者血清HMGB₁、CK、CK-MB、LDH、LD₁、AST水平升高,HMGB1参与了心肌的缺血再灌注损伤过程。

Objective To investigate before extracorporeal circulation and after HMGB₁, CK, CK-MB, LDH, LD₁, AST levels and significance in serum of patients. Methods 57 cases before extracorporeal circulation surgery and after, the levels of HMGB₁ were detected by ELISA,while the levels of CK and CK-MB and LDH and LD₁ and AST were detected by using conventional methods of clinical. Difference of HMGB₁ and CK, CK-MB, LDH, LD₁ and AST levels were compared. The relationship were been analyzed on the patients before extracorporeal circulation surgery and after. Results In extracorporeal circulation surgery, HMGB₁, CK, CK-MB, LDH, LD₁, AST levels after surgery in 0.5 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours,72 hours were higher than before surgery (P<0.05); HMGB₁, CK, CK-MB, LD₁, AST levels peaked at 24 hours aftersurgery, LDH levels was peaked at 48 hours after surgery, and then gradually declined. Extracorporeal circulation blocking was prolonged, the levels of HMGB₁ and CK and CK-MB and LDH and LD₁ and AST were elevated. After extracorporeal circulation surgery in serum the levels of HMGB₁ expression and CK,CK-MB,LDH, AST indicators showed a positive correlation(P<0.05). Conclusion The levels of HMGB₁, CK, CK-MB, LDH, LD₁ and AST were elevated after extracorporeal circulation surgery. HMGB₁ was involved in myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury.