论著
目的 分析常规炎性指标与进展性脑梗死(PCI)患者病灶损害程度的关联,及其对预后水平的预测效能。方法 采用回顾性研究,纳入2021年6月—2023年2月平顶山市第二人民医院收治的100例PCI患者,根据入院时神经功能缺损评分(NIHSS)结果,将NIHSS评分≥21分的30例患者列为重度组,将NIHSS评分15~20分的35例患者列为中度组,将NIHSS评分<15分的35例患者列为轻度组,比较三组患者的神经功能血清学指标及炎症指标,经Pearson相关性分析炎症指标与神经功能血清学指标的相关性;根据是否发生不良预后将入组患者分为预后良好组和预后不良组,比较两组患者各炎症指标及改良Rakin量表(mRS)评分间的差异,并通过绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线、曲线下面积(AUC)评估炎症指标对PCI患者预后水平的预测效能。结果 重度组患者的C-反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)分别为(26.44±5.18)mg/L、(95.28±10.46)ng/L、(45.24±10.31)pg/mL,均高于中度组[(23.12±5.46)mg/L、(90.44±10.17)ng/L、(40.25±10.18)pg/mL],轻度组[(20.28±5.33)mg/L、(84.33±10.27)ng/L、(35.62±8.45)pg/mL],差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。重度组的神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、S100钙结合蛋白β(S100β)分别为(25.45±5.69)μg/L、(60.45±10.31)ng/mL,均高于中度组[(22.18±5.36)μg/L、(55.27±10.46)ng/mL],轻度组[(19.44±5.37)μg/L、(50.49±10.25)ng/mL],差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经Pearson相关性分析,PCI患者的CRP、IL-6、TNF-α等常见炎性指标水平与NSE、S100β等神经功能血清学指标水平正相关(P<0.05)。经检测,预后不良组的CRP、IL-6、TNF-α、mRS分别为(26.62±5.31)mg/L、(96.77±10.24)ng/L、(47.25±10.33)pg/mL、(4.24±1.33)分,均高于预后良好组[(23.75±5.44)mg/L、(91.25±10.37)ng/L、(41.12±10.44)pg/mL,(3.36±0.27)分],差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。经ROC曲线验证,CRP、IL-6、TNF-α等常见炎性指标水平越高,PCI患者的mRS评分越高(AUC均>0.85)。结论 CRP、IL-6、TNF-α等常见炎性指标会随PCI患者脑神经功能损伤程度加剧而不断升高,与病灶损害程度正相关;通过检测上述炎性指标能实现对患者不良预后的早期预测。
Objective To analyze the correlation between routine inflammatory indicators and the degree of lesion damage in progressive cerebral infarction(PCI) patients,as well as predictive efficacy of indicators on prognosis levels.Methods This is a retrospective study,with case enrollment from June 2021 to February 2023.The study subjects were 100 PCI patients.Based on the NIHSS score at admission,30 patients with a NIHSS score ≥ 21 were classified as the severe group,35 patients with a NIHSS score of 15~20 were classified as the moderate group,and 35 patients with a NIHSS score <15 were classified as the mild group.The neurological function serological and inflammatory indicators of the three groups of patients were compared.The correlation between inflammatory indicators and neurological serological indicators was verified by Pearson correlation coefficient.According to the occurrence of adverse prognosis,enrolled patients were divided into good prognosis group and poor prognosis group.The differences in inflammatory indicators and mRS scores between the two groups were compared,and the predictive power of inflammatory indicators on the prognosis level of PCI patients was evaluated by plotting ROC and observing AUC.Results After testing,the levels of CRP,IL-6 and TNF in the severe group were(26.44±5.18)mg/L,(95.28±10.46)ng/L and(45.24±10.31)pg/mL,respectively,higher than those in the moderate group[(23.12±5.46)mg/L,(90.44±10.17)ng/L and(40.25±10.18)pg/mL]and the mild group[(20.28±5.33)mg/L,(84.33±10.27)ng/L and(35.62±8.45)pg/mL](P<0.05).NSE and S100β in the severe group were(25.45±5.69)μg/L and(60.45±10.31)ng/mL,all higher than those in the moderate group[(22.18±5.36)μg/L,(55.27±10.46)ng/mL]and mild group[(19.44±5.37)μg/L,(50.49±10.25)ng/mL](P<0.05).According to Pearson correlation coefficient test,CRP,IL-6,TNF-α and mRS in PCI patients positively correlated with NSE,S100β(P<0.05).After testing,CRP,IL-6,TNF-α and mRS in the group with poor prognosis were(26.62±5.31)mg/L,(96.77±10.24)ng/L,(47.25±10.33)pg/mL and(4.24±1.33)scores,respectively,which were higher than those in the group with good prognosis[(23.75±5.44)mg/L,(91.25±10.37)ng/L,(41.12±10.44)pg/mL and(3.36±0.27)scores](P<0.05).Verified by ROC curve,the higher the levels of CRP,IL-6 and TNF- α,the higher the mRS scores of PCI patients(AUC>0.85).Conclusions Common inflammatory indicators such as CRP,IL-6 and TNF- α of PCI will continue to increase with the severity of brain nerve function damage in patients,and are positively correlated with the degree of lesions damage.By detecting the aforementioned inflammatory indicators,early prediction of poor prognosis can be achieved for patients.
论著
目的 探讨替罗非班联合丁苯酞应用于进展性脑梗死的疗效与安全性。方法 选取2016年1月—2018年1月广州医科大学附属第三医院神经内科收治的进展性脑梗死患者98例。对照组采用硫酸氢氯吡格雷加阿司匹林(双抗)治疗,观察组采用替罗非班(静脉治疗48 h)联合丁苯酞序贯双抗治疗。结果 替罗非班联合丁苯酞序贯双抗治疗组的神经功能缺损(NIHSS)评分、日常生活能力评定量表(Barthel指数)、改良 Rankin 量表评分优于对照组,血浆凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)与凝血酶时间(TT)水平高于对照组,两组有差异。两组患者药物不良反应发生率无差异。结论 替罗非班联合丁苯酞序贯双抗治疗可明显改善进展性脑梗死的神经功能,为时间窗外的进展性脑梗死提供了治疗方法,疗效显著。
Objective To observe the effect and safety of triofiban combined with butylphthalide in treatment of progressive cerebral infarction. Methods A total of 98 patients with progressive cerebral infarction in the department of neurology from January 2016 to January 2018.The control group was treated with clopidogrel hydrogen sulfate plus aspirin(dual antiplatelet). The observer group was treated with Tirofiban(48 h intravenous treatment) combined with butylphthalide on the basis of the treatment of the control group. Results The score of National Institutes of Health Stroke、 Barthel Index and mRS in the triofiban combined with butylphthalide group were better than that of the control group. There were statistical differences between the two groups. PT,APTT and TT were higher than that in the control group .There was no significant difference in drug adverse reactions between the two groups. Conclusion Triofiban combined with butylphthalide may improve the neurologic function of progressive cerebral infarction and provide treatment for progressive cerebral infarction outside the time window.
临床诊疗
目的 探讨S100B蛋白水平与进展性脑梗塞病情的相关性,分析不同 S100B 蛋白含量的患者预后情况。方法 选取2011年10月—2012年9月在我院接受治疗的急性进展性脑梗死患者80例为研究对象。比较不同脑损害程度,进展性脑梗塞患者S100B蛋白含量及NIHSS评分动态变化。结果 急性进展性脑梗死患者血清S100B蛋白含量在治疗后第1、3、7天均升高(P<0.05),且第3天达最高,最高值随着脑梗死面积的增大而增加,第14天下降至最低,与对照组相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。急性进展性脑梗死患者NIHSS评分与治疗前相比,在治疗后第1、3、7天均升高(P<0.05),且第3天达最高,最高值随着脑梗死面积的增大而增加,第14天下降至最低,与对照组相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。采用Pearson对患者血清S100B蛋白含量和NIHSS评分进行相关性分析,得出相关系数为0.583,P<0.05,即血清SI00B蛋白水平与NIHSS评分呈正相关。结论 急性进展性脑梗塞患者血清S100B蛋白水平与脑梗死损坏程度及神经功能正相关,可用来判定该类患者病情及预后情况。