目的 研究二次剖宫产后续妊娠的分娩方式。方法 选取广州市妇女儿童医疗中心2015年8月1日—2017年12月31日的第三次及以上妊娠孕妇资料,要求前两次均为剖宫产,本次妊娠为头位单胎。分析本次妊娠相关因素及最终分娩方式、妊娠结局及围产儿情况。结果 二次剖宫产后阴道分娩与急诊、择期剖宫产相比,三组子宫破裂、新生儿窒息等的发生率差异无统计学意义。成功阴道分娩者本次均为自然临产。结论 二次剖宫产后,第三次妊娠分娩方式的选择包括顺产及剖宫产,在妊娠结局、母儿并发症方面差异无统计学意义,有阴道试产史是成功阴道分娩的有利因素。孕妇尤其是自然临产孕妇可在严密监护下选择阴道试产。

Objective To study the delivery mode after two previous cesareans. Methods We selected pregnant women, single cephalic, following two previous cesareans in Guangzhou Women and Children Medical Center, from August 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. Analysis of this pregnancy related factors and final delivery mode, the maternal and fetal morbidities were studied. Results There wasn't statistical significance in the incidence of uterine rupture, neonatal asphyxia among vaginal birth after two previous cesareans, selected cesarean section and emergency cesarean section. And the success cases of vaginal delivery are natural labor. Conclusion The delivery modes after two previous cesareans include vaginal delivery and cesarean section. There are no statistical significance in pregnancy outcomes. Vaginal trial history are the favorable factors of successful vaginal delivery. Especially in pregnant women with natural vaginal labor we can choose vaginal delievery under intensive care.

目的 探讨COOK双球囊导管和欣普贝生引产的优劣性。方法 选择住院分娩的孕妇388例,根据引产方式分为两组,研究组应用COOK双球囊导管,对照组应用欣普贝生。根据宫颈Bishop评分,研究组分为研究组1和研究组2,对照组分为对照组1和对照组2,研究组1和对照组1宫颈Bishop评分小于或等于3分,研究组2和对照组2宫颈Bishop评分大于3分而小于或等于6分。分别对各组促宫颈成熟及引产情况、妊娠结局进行比较。结果 各组放置COOK宫颈双球囊或欣普贝生前后,宫颈Bishop评分有差异,低宫颈Bishop评分组欣普贝生效果更好。研究组与对照组比较,阴道分娩和剖宫产病例差异无统计学意义;急产、产后出血、羊水污染病例差异有统计学意义。研究组新生儿窒息率低于对照组,体温>37.5℃发生率高于对照组,差异无统计学意义。结论 对宫颈条件较差者,建议选用欣普贝生诱导宫颈成熟;COOK双球囊导管引产,作用温和,安全性好,成功率高。

Objective To evaluate the advantage of the COOK double balloon catheter and Propess induced labor. Methods We collected 388 cases with pregnant women. The patients were divided into the research and control groups. The research group applied COOK double balloon catheter while the control group applies Propess. According to cervical Bishop rating, the research team was divided into research group 1 and research group 2. The control group was divided into control group 1 and the control group 2. The cervical Bishop score of the research group 1 and control group 1 was less than or equals 3 points. The cervical Bishop score of the research group 2 and the control group 2 was greater than 3 and less than or equal 6 points. We separately compared the pregnancy outcome for each group to promote cervical mature and induced labor situation. Results The cervical Bishop scores have significant difference before and after COOK cervical double balloon and Propess are positioned between two groups.The effect of low cervical Bishop scores group is better than the high cervical Bishop by propess. The rates of urgent production, postpartum hemorrhage and amniotic fluid pollution reduce significant in the research group. The neonatal asphyxia rate, incidence of temperature > 37.5, vaginal delivery cases and cesarean section cases have not significant differences between the research group and the control group. Conclusion We suggest that patients whose cervical condition is poor should choose Propess induced cervical mature; The COOK double balloon catheter induced labor is safe and has a high success rate.