目的 探讨臂丛神经阻滞和关节腔内注射局麻药联合应用在肩关节镜手术中的应用价值。方法 对肩关节镜手术患者100例进行研究,2018年8月—2020年8月入组,根据随机数字表法分组处理,对照组和观察组各为50例,前者用臂丛神经阻滞,后者与关节腔内注射局麻药联合,比较2组麻醉效果、不同阶段疼痛程度、肩关节功能。另对比2组不良反应。结果 观察组麻醉起效时间、苏醒时间和拔管时间分别为(10.72±2.45)min、(8.21±1.32)min和(9.52±1.12)min,与对照组对应指标有差异(P<0.05);2组术前疼痛程度和肩关节功能对比无差异(P>0.05),观察组术后6 h、术后24 h和术后48 h疼痛评分依次为(1.31±0.27)分、(2.87±0.52)分和(3.44±0.42)分,术后6 h、术后12 h、术后24 h和术后48 h镇静评分分别为(2.92±0.32)分、(2.54±0.24)分、(2.38±0.12)分和(2.27±0.15)分,术后1周、1个月和3个月的肩关节功能评分分别为(50.12±4.54)分、(56.18±4.12)分和(73.16±4.78)分,较之于对照组有差异(P<0.05);对照组和观察组出现不良反应的概率分别为18.00%和4.00%(P<0.05)。 结论 在肩关节镜手术中联合应用臂丛神经阻滞联合关节腔内注射局麻药麻醉方式,可提高麻醉效果,术后镇痛和镇静效果明显,也可减少不良反应,对患者肩关节功能改善作用明显,存在广泛应用价值。

目的 观察聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子(PEG-rhG-CSF)与重组人粒细胞刺激因子(rhG-CSF)在造血干细胞移植后促进造血恢复的疗效对比。方法 回顾分析2016年1月—2020年12月以来在深圳市第二人民医院血液科进行造血干细胞移植的恶性血液疾病患者共 100例,随机分为2组,分别在造血干细胞回输后给与聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子与重组人粒细胞刺激因子。结果 PEG-rhG-CSF组与rhG-CSF组中性粒细胞植入时间分别为(18.7±3.4)天、(18.0±3.1)天,P=0.281,无统计学差异。粒细胞缺乏伴发热在PEG-rhG-CSF组与rhG-CSF组分别发生26例、29例,发生率分别为53.06%、56.86%,P=0.89,无差异。用药次数分别为2.6次(2~5次)、18.1次(11~31次),P<0.05,差异有统计学意义。不良反应主要为骨痛、肌肉疼痛。结论 PEG-rhG-CSF组与rhG-CSF组结果相似,PEG-rhG-CSF具有用药次数少的优势。

Objective The efficacy of pegylated recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) and recombinant human granulocyte stimulating factor(rhG-CSF) in promoting hematopoiesis recovery after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Methods The data of 100 patients with malignant blood diseases who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the Hematology Department of Shenzhen Second People's Hospital from January 2016 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.They were randomly assigned to two groups,which accepted PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF respectively after hematopoietic stem cell transfusion.Results The time of neutrophil implantation in PEG-rhG-CSF group and rhG-CSF group were (18.7±3.4) days and (18.0±3.1) days respectively,P=0.281,showing no statistical difference.There were 26 cases of neutropenia with fever in PEG-rhG-CSF group and 29 cases in rhG-CSF group,with incidence of 53.06% and 56.86% (P=0.89),showing no statistical difference.The times of medication were 2.6 times (2-5 times) and 18.1 times (11-31 times),P<0.05,with significant statistical difference.The main adverse reactions were bone pain and muscle pain.Conclusions The outcomes of PEG-rhG-CSF group and rhG-CSF group were similar,PEG-rhG-CSF had the advantage of fewer times of medication.