目的 探讨导航护士主导的三级质控在胸腔镜肺癌切除术患者加速康复中的应用效果。方法 选取2020年6月—2023年6月周口市中心医院收治的106例肺癌患者,应用随机数字表法分为观察组（n=53）与对照组（n=53）。患者均采取胸腔镜肺癌切除术治疗,对照组实施常规的术前、术中及术后相关围术期护理,观察组在常规围术期护理基础上增加导航护士主导的三级质控护理。对比两组住院时间、术后并发症和护理前后世界卫生组织生活质量-100量表（WHOQOL-100）及癌因性疲乏程度（PFS）,最后对比两组的护理满意度。结果 观察组首次排气时间、首次下床时间、术后疼痛视觉模拟量表（VAS）评分、术后住院时间均优于对照组（P<0.05）;观察组并发症发生率低于对照组（P<0.05）;干预后两组WHOQOL-100评分升高、PFS评分降低,观察组均优于对照组（P<0.05）;观察组护理满意度高于对照组（P<0.05）。结论 对胸腔镜肺癌切除术患者,采取导航护士主导的三级质控管理的加速康复护理,可促进患者术后肠胃功能恢复,缩短住院时间,减轻术后疼痛感与减少并发症,在改善患者癌因性症状的同时,提升其生活质量,提高患者护理满意度。

Objective To explore the application effect of three-level quality control led by navigation nurses in accelerating rehabilitation of patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer resection．Methods A total of 106 lung cancer patients admitted to our hospital from June 2020 to June 2023 were selected and randomly divided into an observation group（n=53）and a control group（n=53）using a random number table method．All patients were treated with thoracoscopic lung cancer resection,while the control group received routine preoperative,intraoperative and postoperative perioperative care,the observation group received a three-level quality control nursing led by navigation nurses in addition to routine perioperative care．The length of hospitalization,postoperative complications,WHOQOL-100 and PFS before and after care,and the nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared．Results The observation group had significantly shorter first exhaust time,first time out of bed,postoperative visual analogue scale（VAS）score and postoperative hospital stay compared to the control group（P<0.05）．The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group（P<0.05）．After intervention,the WHOQOL-100 scores of both groups increased,and the observation group was higher than the control group．The PFS score decreased,and the observation group was lower than the control group（P<0.05）．The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group（P<0.05）．Conclusions Adopting a three-level quality control management led by navigation nurses to accelerate rehabilitation care for patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer resection can promote postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function,reduce hospitalization time,reduce postoperative pain and complications,improve cancer related symptoms,improve their quality of life and increase patients nursing satisfaction．

目的 对比分析电视胸腔镜手术与传统开胸手术在胸腺瘤治疗中的临床疗效。方法 将我院2018年11月—2020年11月间收治的92例胸腺瘤患者作为本次实验案例,根据随机双盲原则进行分组,其中对照组46例患者采用传统开胸手术治疗,观察组46例患者采用电视胸腔镜手术治疗,对于2组患者治疗中的临床疗效进行对比分析。结果 观察组术后的肺功能指标下降幅度小于对照组,且观察组的手术时间、胸管引流时间、下床活动时间、住院时间均短于对照组,出血量、引流量低于对照组,切口长度小于对照组,组间指标数据存在统计学差异(P＜0.05)。结论 电视胸腔镜手术与传统开胸手术在胸腺瘤治疗中的临床疗效相比,前者创伤小、恢复快、对于患者肺功能的影响更小,具有明显的优势。

目的 对比分析电视胸腔镜手术与传统开胸手术在胸腺瘤治疗中的临床疗效。方法 将我院2018年11月—2020年11月间收治的92例胸腺瘤患者作为本次实验案例,根据随机双盲原则进行分组,其中对照组46例患者采用传统开胸手术治疗,观察组46例患者采用电视胸腔镜手术治疗,对于2组患者治疗中的临床疗效进行对比分析。结果 观察组术后的肺功能指标下降幅度小于对照组,且观察组的手术时间、胸管引流时间、下床活动时间、住院时间均短于对照组,出血量、引流量低于对照组,切口长度小于对照组,P＜0.05,组间指标数据存在统计学差异。结论 电视胸腔镜手术与传统开胸手术在胸腺瘤治疗中的临床疗效相比,前者具有明显的优势,创伤小、恢复快、对于患者肺功能的影响更小。

目的 探讨重症胸外伤患者在行胸腔镜手术探查同期行肋骨骨折内固定术的有效性和临床意义。方法 选取我院2008年—2017年收治的68例具有胸腔镜手术探查指征的重症胸外伤患者,其中36例同期行肋骨骨折内固定术,32例单纯行胸腔镜探查术。比较2组患者的VAS评分、镇痛药物用量、卧床时间、住院天数等。结果 2组患者术后VAS评分、镇痛药物用量、卧床时间、住院天数等有统计学差异。结论 胸腔镜手术探查同期行肋骨骨折内固术治疗重症胸外伤可降低术后并发症的发生,加速患者的康复,值得推广。

Objective To investigate the clinical significance and effectiveness of thoracic endoscopic surgery for patients with severe thoracic trauma. Methods 68 cases of severe thoracic trauma with thoracoscopic operation, of which 36 cases underwent internal fixation of rib fracture and 32 cases were performed by thoracoscope. The VAS score, analgesic dosage, bed time and hospitalization days were compared between the two groups. Results There were significant differences in VAS score, analgesic dosage, bed time and hospitalization days after operation in the two groups. Conclusion The treatment of severe thoracic trauma by thoracoscopic surgery and internal fixation of rib fracture may reduce postoperative complications and accelerate the recovery of patients, which is worth popularizing.

目的 对比观察单孔、单操作孔及三孔胸腔镜治疗早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效。方法 选择125 例早期NSCLC患者,分为单孔组(38例)单操作孔组(42例)和三孔胸腔镜组(45例),观察3组手术结果和并发症发生率。结果 3组患者均顺利完成手术,无中转开胸。单孔组手术时间长于单操作孔及三孔组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0. 05)。对比所有3组手术患者的术中出血量及淋巴结清扫数目、术后总引流量及引流管留置时间、术后并发症发生率,差异无统计学意义(P＞0. 05)。单孔组及单操作孔组术后疼痛程度评分优于三孔组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0. 05)。结论 单孔及操作孔胸腔镜治疗早期NSCLC已可取代三孔胸腔镜技术,其术后恢复快,疗效确切,其中单孔手术对设备及胸腔镜医师操作技术熟练程度等要求更高,故在设备仍未有突破性的进展时,单操作孔胸腔镜手术可作为治疗早期NSCLC的优先选择。

Objective To compare the clinical effects of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), single utility port VATS and 3-portal VATS lobectomy for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Methods Patients were divided into uniportal VATS lobectomy group(n=38), single utility port VATS lobectomy group(n=42) and 3-portal VATS lobectomy group (n=45). The surgical results and complication rates were observed. Results All patients completed the operation successfully, no one was changed to open operation. Operation time in uniportal VATS lobectomy group were longer than single utility port VATS lobectomy group and 3-portal VATS lobectomy group(P＜0. 05). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissection, the amount and time of postoperative extubation, and the incidence of postoperative complications(P＞0. 05). Post-operative pain score were higher in 3-portal VATS lobectomy group than in uniportal VATS lobectomy group and single utility port VATS lobectomy group (P＜0. 05). Conclusion Uniportal VATS lobectomy and single utility port VATS lobectomy can replace the 3-portal VATS lobectomy in treatment of early NSCLC, because of the faster postoperative recovery and curative effect. Uniportal VATS lobectomy requires special equipment and more operation skills, as there is no breakthrough in the equipment, single utility port VATS lobectomy may still be used as the first choice for treatment of early NSCLC.