目的 探讨胆囊结石并发肝外胆管结石经腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）联合内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影术（ERCP）/内窥镜下括约肌切开术（EST）治疗的临床效果。方法 选取2020年1月—2023年6间就诊于南平市第一医院的86例胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石患者,根据治疗方案不同分为对照组（n=40）和观察组（n=46）。对照组给予LC联合经腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术（LCBDE）治疗,观察组给予LC联合ERCP、EST在治疗,观察两组手术相关指标情况、血管紧张素水平、肝功能以及并发症发生情况。结果 观察组患者术中出血量少于对照组的（t=12.440,P<0.001）,观察组手术用时、肛门排气时间以及住院时间均短于对照组（均P<0.001）;观察组血管紧张素1-7（Ang1-7）、血管紧张素Ⅰ（AngⅠ）、血管紧张素Ⅱ（AngⅡ）水平低于对照组,组间比较差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）;观察组总胆红素（TBIL）、谷氨酸转氨酶（ALT）水平低于对照组水平,组间比较差异无统计学意义（均P>0.05）;观察组无患者发生胆漏、结石残留,对照组胆漏、结石残留发生率分别为5.00%、2.50 %,组间对比差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）,观察组出血、胆道感染生率分别为4.35 %、2.17 %低于对照组10.00%、5.00 %,组间对比差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05。结论 LC联合ERCP/EST治疗胆囊结石合并肝外胆管结石可以减少术中出血,缩短手术用时和住院时间。

Objective This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy（LC）combined with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography（ERCP）or endoscopic sphincterotomy（EST）in the treatment of gallbladder stones complicated by extrahepatic bile duct stones．Methods A total of 86 patients with gallbladder stones and extrahepatic bile duct stones treated at the First Hospital of Nanping from January 2020 to June 2023 were selected．According to different treatment regimens,they were divided into a control group（n=40）and an observation group（n=46）．The control group received LC combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration（LCBDE）,while the observation group received LC combined with ERCP and EST．Surgical-related indicators,angiotensin levels,liver function,and complications were observed in both groups．Results The observation group had less intraoperative bleeding than the control group（t=12.440,P<0.001）．The observation group had a shorter operation time,postoperative anal exhaust time,and hospital stay than the control group（all P<0.001）．The levels of angiotensin 1-7（Ang1-7）,angiotensin I（AngⅠ）,and angiotensin II（AngⅡ）in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,with no statistically significant differences between the groups（all P>0.05）．Total bilirubin（TBIL）and alanine aminotransferase（ALT）levels in the observation group were comparable to those in the control group（all P>0.05）．No patients in the observation group experienced bile leakage or residual stones,while the incidence rates in the control group were 5.00% and 2.50%,respectively,with no statistically significant differences between the groups（all P>0.05）．The observation group had lower rates of bleeding and biliary tract infection at 4.35% and 2.17%,respectively,compared to the control group at 10.00% and 5.00%,with no statistically significant differences between the groups（all P>0.05）．Conclusions LC combined with ERCP/EST in the treatment of gallbladder stones complicated by extrahepatic bile duct stones can reduce intraoperative bleeding,shorten operation time,and decrease hospital stay．

目的 探究单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术（LC）治疗胆囊结石（GD）患者的效果。方法 回顾性收集2021年1月—2023年9月郑州大学附属郑州中心医院收治的96例GD患者病例资料,按手术方案不同分两组。以接受单孔LC治疗的48例患者列为A组,以接受三孔LC治疗的48例患者列为B组。对比两组围术期指标、手术前后胃肠激素指标[胃泌素（GAS）、胃动素（MTL）]、肝功能指标[天门冬氨酸转氨酶（AST）、丙氨酸氨基转移酶（ALT）]、疼痛介质指标[前列腺素E2（PGE-2）、5-羟色胺（5-HT）]水平、术后并发症发生率。结果 A组手术用时（71.56±6.29）min更长于B组（62.37±5.85）min,术后排气时间（15.37±2.26）h、住院用时（5.30±1.24）d、切口总长度（1.84±0.27）cm短于B组（17.49±3.55）h、（7.64±1.35）d、（4.13±0.35）cm,术中失血量（41.28±4.36）mL低于B组（58.31±6.52）mL更低（均P<0.001）;术后1 d A组GAS（113.34±13.47）pg/mL、MTL（202.78±24.68）pg/mL水平高于B组（102.65±11.08）pg/mL、（164.34±20.76）pg/mL（均P<0.001）;术后1d A组AST（31.82±3.62）U/L、ALT（40.36±4.74）U/L水平低于B组（38.78±4.03）U/L、（51.60±5.42）U/L（均P<0.001）;术后1 d A组SP（55.84±5.90）ng/L、5-HT（132.17±9.16）ng/mL、PGE-2（25.45±4.27）ng/mL水平低于B组（73.27±7.51）ng/L、（173.54±13.32）ng/mL、（31.71±5.24）ng/mL（均P<0.001）;A组并发症发生率2.08%（1/48）低于B组16.67%（8/48）更低。结论 与三孔LC治疗GD患者相比,经单孔LC治疗会略微延长手术用时,但能进一步减少术中失血量,降低术后并发症风险,缩短切口长度及患者康复进程,且对机体胃肠功能、肝功能影响更小,对机体造成疼痛应激更轻微,更符合微创特征。

Objective To explore the effect of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy（LC）in the treatment of patients with gallstone disease（GD）．Methods Retrospective data of 96 GD patients in Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University（January 2021—September 2023）were collected and divided into two groups according to different surgical protocols．Forty-eight patients receiving single-incision LC were classified as group A,and 48 patients receiving three-port LC were classified as group B．The perioperative indexes,gastrointestinal hormone indexes[gastrin（GAS）,motilin（MTL）],liver function indexes[aspartate aminotransferase（AST）,alanine aminotransferase（ALT）],pain mediator indexes[prostaglandin E2（PGE-2）,5-hydroxytryptamine（5-HT）] before and after operation,and the incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups．Results The operation time in group A was（71.56±6.29）min,which was longer than that in group B（62.37±5.85）min．In group A,the postoperative exhaust time was（15.37±2.26）h,hospitalization time was（5.30±1.24）d,and the total length of incision was（1.84±0.27）cm,which were shorter than those in group B[（17.49±3.55）h,（7.64±1.35）d,and（4.13±0.35）cm]．The intraoperative blood loss was（41.28±4.36）mL,which were lower than（58.31±6.52）mL in group B（all P<0.001）．The levels of GAS[（113.34±13.47）pg/mL] and MTL[（202.78±24.68）pg/mL] in group A were higher than those in group B[（102.65±11.08）pg/mL and（164.34±20.76）pg/mL]（all P<0.001）．The levels of AST[（31.82±3.62）U/L] and ALT[（40.36±4.74）U/L] in group A were lower than those in group B[（38.78±4.03）U/L and（51.60±5.42）U/L]（all P<0.001）．The levels of SP[（55.84±5.90）ng/L],5-HT[（132.17±9.16）ng/mL],pge-2[（25.45±4.27）ng/mL] in group A were lower than those in group B[（73.27±7.51）ng/L,（173.54±13.32）ng/mL and （31.71±5.24）ng/mL]（all P<0.001）．The incidence of complications in group A was 2.08%（1/48）,which was lower than that in group B[16.67%（8/48）]（χ²=4.414,P=0.036）．Conclusion sCompared with three-port LC for GD patients,single-incision LC can slightly prolong the operation time,but it can further reduce the intraoperative blood loss,reduce the risk of postoperative complications,shorten the incision length and the rehabilitation process of patients,and has less impact on the gastrointestinal function and liver function,causing less pain stress to the body,which is more in line with the characteristics of minimally invasive．