目的 比较甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑和丙泊酚在超声胃镜检查中的有效性和安全性。方法 采用随机对照的研究方法,选择接受超声胃镜病人60例,分为观察组(29例)和对照组(31例)。观察组采用甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑麻醉,对照组采用丙泊酚。观察麻醉过程中不同时点的血流动力学指标、改良警觉/镇静(MOAA/S)评分各时刻的变化、苏醒及离室时间、围术期不良事件。结果 观察组的血流动力学影响更小;观察组可进入足够的镇静深度,而对照组的镇静程度更深;2组起效时间相似,且迅速苏醒而离室,但在苏醒及离室时间方面观察组稍短;不良事件对照组高于观察组。结论 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑应用于无痛超声胃镜检查,其对血流动力学影响小,能产生足够的镇静深度,能使患者迅速苏醒,且不良事件发生率低,总体有效性和安全性优于丙泊酚。

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate and propofol in painless ultrasonic gastroscopy. Methods In a randomized, single-blind controlled study, 60 patients undergoing ultrasonic gastroscopy were selected and divided into observation group (31 cases) and control group (29 cases). Observation group was anesthetized with remimazolam tosilate, while control group was anesthetized with propofol. Two groups' hemodynamic index, perioperative adverse events, changes of MOAA/S score, awakening and departure time were observed at different time points during anesthesia. Results The observation group had less changes on hemodynamics. The observation group had enough depth of sedation, while the control group had a deeper degree of sedation. The onset time of the two groups was similar and both awoke quickly and left, but the awakening time and leaving time in the observation group were slightly shorter. Adverse events in the control group were more than those in the observation group. Conclusions Remimazolam tosilate for painless ultrasonic gastroscopy had little effect on hemodynamics, which can generate enough depth of sedation, and make patients wake up quickly. In addition, the incidence of its adverse events was low, and the overall effectiveness and safety were superior to those of propofol.

目的 探讨无痛镇静在胃镜下上消化道异物取出术中的应用价值。方法 回顾分析2017年5月1日—2020年5月1日在东莞东华医院消化内镜中心接受内镜下上消化道异物取出术患者,对其临床资料进行分析,总结比较在无痛镇静下和普通胃镜下上消化道异物取出术两组患者的诊疗效果。结果 共357例患者,行胃镜下异物取出术共372次,其中无痛镇静组99例,普通组273例,其中15例患者在普通胃镜下异物取出术失败改为无痛镇静下胃镜取出术成功取出,最终10人异物未取出转外科或上级医院;在无痛镇静下行胃镜上消化道异物取出术比普通胃镜下异物取出术成功率高(P＜0.05),黏膜损伤、出血、穿孔等并发症少(P＜0.05),人均费用低(P＜0.05);无痛镇静后患者血氧饱和度、血压下降(P＜0.05),心率升高(P＜0.05),其中老年人影响明显(P＜0.05),但不影响患者内镜操作,氟马西尼催醒后心率、血氧饱和度、血压恢复正常(P＞0.05)。结论 在无痛镇静下行胃镜上消化道异物取术安全、有效、成功率高、医疗费用少,患者易于接受的好方法,值得推广。

Objective To explore the application value of painless gastroscope in the removal of foreign body in upper gastrointestinal tract. Methods The study involved patients who visited at the department of endoscopy center at Hospital (Dongguan, China). Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing endoscopic removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract from May 1, 2017 to May 1, 2020. We analyzed the patients' clinical data and compared the diagnosis and treatment effect between the painless gastroscope group and normal gastroscopy group. Results A total of 357 patients were included, 372 times of removal of foreign body under gastroscope were conducted. A total of 99 cases in painless gastroscope group were treated by painless gastroscope with painless sedation, 273 cases in normal gastroscopy group were treated by normal gastroscopy, among them, 15 cases were failed to removal the foreign body treated by normal gastroscopy, and turned into the painless sedation gastroscopy. Finally, 10 patients with foreign bodies were not removed and transferred to surgical department or higher level hospitals. In the treatment of endoscopic foreign body removal, the success rate of painless gastroscope group was higher (P<0.05), the complication incidence of mucosal injury, bleeding and perforation and cost per capita were lower than that of normal gastroscopy(P<0.05). Following painless sedation, the blood oxygen saturation, blood pressure dropped (P<0.05) and heart rate increased (P<0.05), the effect of the sedatives on the elderly was the most obvious (P<0.05), but it did not affect the patient's endoscopic operation, and the heart rate, blood oxygen saturation and blood pressure (P>0.05) after awakening. Conclusion Painless gastroscope in the removal of foreign body in upper gastrointestinal tract is safe, effective high success rate, less medical cost, and easy for patients to accept, it should be widely applied.

目的 研究对比胃癌患者术前胃镜活检病理与外科术后病理的异同并进行观察。方法 选取我院消化科于2016年7月—2017年12月收治的64例胃癌患者作为此次研究对象,术前均展开胃镜活检,术后展开外科病理检查,判断两种诊断方法的异同。结果 胃癌确诊率对比,术前胃镜活检后确诊胃癌患者占比85.9%(55/64),疑似胃癌患者占比10.9%(7/64),排除胃癌患者占比3.1%(2/64),术前胃镜活检确诊率85.9%,低于术后病理诊断95.3%,组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);胃镜活检病理结果对比,术前胃镜检查黏液腺癌占比35.9%,乳头状腺癌占比51.6%,均高于术后病理检查的25.0%、28.1%,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05);胃镜活检分化程度结果对比,胃镜病理与术后病理检查结果对比有明显差异,具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 对胃癌进行诊断时,尽管术前胃镜活检病理检查与外科术后病理检查结果存在差异,但术前胃镜活检对胃癌确诊率较为理想,可作为术前诊断参考,外科术后病理检查对全面评估胃癌病情具有较高应用价值,值得在临床中应用。

目的 了解CHPS患儿经胃镜下幽门肌切开术治疗后幽门部黏膜近期各种并发症的发生情况及对预后的影响。方法 选取2006—2012年我院新生儿科确诊的34例CHPS患儿。以超细胃镜进入十二指肠乳头处,使用电切刀按上行性方向,沿幽门管纵轴切割肥厚狭窄的幽门管黏膜及环形肌以解除幽门部梗阻。术后第1、3、6月复查胃镜。结果 34例CHPS患儿共行胃镜下幽门肌切开术48次,均未发生胃及幽门穿孔、撕裂等严重并发症。24例患儿术后通过胃镜进行了复查,胃镜见幽门部及黏膜改变主要有黏膜充血肿胀、切口未完全愈合、切口疤痕形成、幽门部息肉形成等。结论 经胃镜下幽门肌切开术是一种安全性较高的治疗CHPS的新技术。术后黏膜充血肿胀、切口未完全愈合等幽门部黏膜改变的发生率随时间下降。切口疤痕形成并未影响幽门功能。