目的 探讨四金石灵膏联合间苯三酚治疗输尿管结石伴肾绞痛的应用价值。方法 随机将76例输尿管结石伴肾绞痛患者分为两组,以接受中药安慰剂联合间苯三酚治疗者为对照组,以接受四金石灵膏联合间苯三酚治疗者为观察组,每组38例。对比两组临床治疗效果,并分析尿液相关指标的变化情况。结果 两组7 d治疗过程中VAS评分及尿Ga水平呈降低趋势、WHOQL-BREF评分及尿OPN水平呈升高趋势(P<0.05),而治疗3 d及7 d后,治疗组VAS评分及尿Ga水平低于对照组、WHOQL-BREF评分及尿OPN水平高于对照组(P<0.05)。同时,治疗7 d后,观察组排石率高于对照组(P<0.05),而观察组排石时间及止痛时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。此外,治疗7 d后,治疗组治疗总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05),而两组间治疗不良反应发生率比较未见差异有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 四金石灵膏联合间苯三酚可有效的提高输尿管结石伴肾绞痛的临床治疗效果,具有较为理想的应用价值。

Objective To explore the application value of four-gold-stone-ling confection and phloroglucinol in the treatment of ureteral calculus with renal colic. Methods 76 patients with ureteral calculus with renal colic were randomly divided into two groups, with those receiving traditional Chinese medicine placebo combined with phloroglucinol as the control group, and those receiving four-gold-stone-ling confection combined with phloroglucinol as the observation group,38 cases in each group. The clinical treatment effects of the two groups were compared, and the changes of urine-related indicators were analyzed. Results The VAS score and urine Ga level of the two groups showed a decreasing trend during 7d treatment, and the WHOQL-BREF score and urine OPN level showed an increasing trend(P<0.05). After 3d and 7d treatment, the VAS score and urine Ga level of the treatment group were lower than that of control group, the WHOQL-BREF score and urine OPN level were higher than that of control group(P<0.05). Meanwhile, After 7d of treatment, the rate of stone drainage in the observation group was higher than that of control group(P<0.05), while the time of stone drainage and pain relief in the observation group was shorter than control group(P<0.05). In addition, after 7d treatment, the total effective rate of the treatment group was higher than control group (P<0.05), while the difference of incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups was not significant(P>0.05). Conclusion Four-gold-stone-ling confection combined with phloroglucinol may effectively improve the clinical effect of ureteral calculi with renal colic, and have ideal application value.

目的 探讨山莨菪碱联合黄体酮治疗高原地区急性肾绞痛的临床疗效。方法 将2016年9月—2017年6月收治的60例急性肾绞痛患者随机分成2组,试验组和对照组各30人,试验组应用黄体酮注射液40 mg肌肉注射,山莨菪碱10 mg加入质量浓度为50 g/L的葡萄糖注射液250 mL静脉滴注;对照组仅用山莨菪碱10 mg加入质量浓度为50 g/L的葡萄糖注射液250 mL静脉滴注。给药前、后15min、30min、1 h及4 h对患者疼痛采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评价其疗效,并观察其起效时间和不良反应。结果 治疗组和对照组总有效率分别为 93.3%和70.0%,2组比较差异有统计学意义( P<0.05);2组药物起效时间比较有差异(P<0.05);给药后15min至4 h,试验组VAS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 山莨菪碱联合黄体酮治疗高原急性肾绞痛安全有效,联用明显优于只采用山莨菪碱。

Objective To study the effect and efficacy of Anisodamine combined with Progesterone in the treatment of acute renal colic in plateau area. Methods From September 2016 to June 2017, 60 cases of acute renal colic patients were randomly divided into experimental group or control group. Both groups are 30 cases. The test group applied the injection of progesterone injection 40 mg by muscle injection and Anisodamine 10mg to the concentration of 5% of glucose injection in 250 mL by intravenous drip. In the control group, only using 10 mg of Anisodamine was added to the 250 mL intravenous drip of 5% glucose injection. The visual Analogue Scale/Score(VAS) was used to evaluate the efficacy of the patients before dosing, after dosing of 15min, 30min, 1 h and 4 h, and we observed their effective time and adverse reactions. Results The total effective rate of treatment group and control group was 93.3 % and 70.0 % respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The VAS score of the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Anisodamine combined with Progesterone is safe and effective in the treatment of plateau acute renal coli, and is obviously better than only using Anisodamine.