传统的结肠镜检查质量评估方式具有主观性强、费时费力等缺点。近年来,人工智能（AI）技术在结肠镜检查质量控制方面展现出客观性、即时性、全面性等优势,具有广阔的应用前景。文章全面探讨了AI在结肠镜检查质量控制中的多个应用场景,包括评估肠道准备质量、记录退镜时间、息肉识别和分类、预测早期结直肠癌浸润深度等方面,并通过具体的研究案例和数据分析了AI技术的有效性和优势。AI技术有望在提升结肠镜检查质量、促进结直肠癌的早诊早治方面发挥更加重要的作用,但面对技术、伦理及法规等多方面的挑战,未来需要持续努力,不断优化算法,加强跨学科合作,推动AI技术在医疗领域的健康、快速发展。

Traditional colonoscopy quality assessment methods have strong subjectivity and are time-consuming．In recent years,artificial intelligence technology has shown objectivity,timeliness,and comprehensiveness in colonoscopy quality control,with broad application prospects．This article comprehensively explores multiple application scenarios of AI in colonoscopy quality control,encompassing assessments of bowel preparation quality,recording of withdrawal times,polyp identification and classification,and prediction of early colorectal cancer invasion depth．Through specific research cases and data analysis,the effectiveness and advantages of AI technology are elucidated．AI technology is expected to play an increasingly significant role in enhancing the quality of colonoscopy and promoting early diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer．However,facing challenges from technology,ethics,regulations,and other aspects,continued efforts are needed in the future to continuously optimize algorithms,strengthen interdisciplinary collaboration,and promote the healthy and rapid development of AI technology in the medical field．

目的 观察环泊酚在老年患者无痛胃肠镜检查中的麻醉效果和不良反应。方法 选择80例65岁以上行无痛胃肠镜检查的老年患者,将患者随机分为环泊酚组（C组）40例和丙泊酚组（P组）40例。每例患者均静脉注射舒芬太尼0.08 μg/kg,30 s后C组给予环泊酚0.3 mg/kg、P组给予丙泊酚1.5 mg/kg。记录2组患者麻醉前（T₀）、睫毛反射消失时（T₁）、置入胃镜后即刻（T₂）和操作结束时（T₃）的心率（HR）和平均动脉压（MAP）;记录2组患者检查操作时间、清醒时间、追加药物次数及静脉注射痛、呼吸抑制、呛咳、体动等不良反应发生情况。结果 2组患者行胃肠镜检查操作时间、麻醉清醒时间和追加药物次数比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。与T₀时间点（102.6±14.1 mmHg）比较,P组患者的MAP在T₁（86.0±12.5 mmHg）、T₂（86.1±13.2 mmHg）、T₃（92.8±12.6 mmHg）时间点明显下降,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;与C组T₁（95.9±10.8 mmHg）、T₂（96.3±9.6 mmHg）时间点比较,P组的MAP在T₁（86.0±12.5 mmHg）、T₂（86.1±13.2 mmHg）时均明显降低（P<0.05）。C组患者静脉注射痛、呼吸抑制的发生率明显低于P组（P<0.05）;2组体动和呛咳的发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 环泊酚0.3 mg/kg在老年患者胃肠镜检查中能提供和丙泊酚1.5 mg/kg相似的麻醉效果,环泊酚组的老年患者发生注射痛、血压下降、呼吸抑制的比例更低。

Objective To observe the effect of ciprofol and propofol in painless gastroenteroscopy in elderly patients．Methods A total of 80 elderly patients aged 65 or above who underwent painless gastroenteroscopy were randomly divided into a group of 40 patients receiving ciprofol（Group C）and a group of 40 patients receiving propofol（Group P）．All patients were given sufentanil 0.08 μg/kg,and group C was given ciprofol 0.3 mg/kg,group P was given propofol 1.5 mg/kg after 30 seconds．The heart rate（HR）and mean arterial pressure（MAP）of two groups of patients before anesthesia（T₀）,at the disappearance of eyelash reflex（T₁）,after gastroscopy insertion（T₂）,and at the end of the procedure（T₃）were recorded．The operating time,anesthesia awakening time,number of additional medications and the adverse reactions such as injection pain,respiratory depression,cough,body movements were also recorded．Results There were no significant differences（P>0.05）in the gastroenteroscopy operating time,recovery time and number of additional medications between the two groups．Compared with T₀ time point（102.6±14.1 mmHg）,the MAP of group P patients significantly decreased at T₁（86.0±12.5 mmHg）,T₂（86.1±13.2 mmHg）and T₃（92.8±12.6 mmHg）time points（P<0.05）．Compared with Group C at T₁（95.9±10.8 mmHg）,T₂（96.3±9.6 mmHg）time points,the MAP of Group P decreased significantly at T₁（86.0±12.5 mmHg）and T₂（86.1±13.2 mmHg）time points（P<0.05）．The incidences of injection pain and respiratory depression in group C were significantly lower than those in group P（P<0.05）．There was no statistically significant difference in the incidences of body movements and cough between the two groups（P>0.05）．Conclusions Ciprofol 0.3 mg/kg combined with sufentanil can provide anesthesia effect similar to that of propofol 1.5 mg/kg combined with sufentanil in gastroenteroscopy of elderly patients．The proportions of injection pain,blood pressure decreasing and respiratory depression in elderly patients in the ciprofol group were lower．

目的 对比纳布啡联合环泊酚、纳布啡联合丙泊酚应用于老年患者无痛胃镜中的效果。方法 选取厦门市中医院2021年10月至2022年10月收治的180例老年患者（均行无痛胃肠镜检查）为研究对象,按照随机数表法分组,其中A组90例患者给予纳布啡联合环泊酚,B组90例患者给予纳布啡联合丙泊酚,对比两组患者麻醉相关指标、血流动力学、围术期不良反应。结果 两组患者诱导量、诱导时间、追加次数、总追加量、苏醒时间、恢复室停留时间对比差异均无统计学意义（t=1.486、0.830、1.157、0.941、0.906、1.403,均P>0.05）;重复测量方差分析结果显示,分组因素间收缩压（SBP）（F=30.019,P<0.001）、心率（HR）（F=282.057,P<0.001）、SpO₂（F=64.518,P<0.001）、;时间因素SBP（F=21.780,P<0.001）、HR（F=345.118,P<0.001）、SpO₂（F=41.762,P<0.001）;分组与时间交互时间因素SBP（F=12.941,P<0.001）、HR（F=193.295,P<0.001）、SpO₂（F=13.546,P<0.001）,差异均有统计学意义。折线图直观显示,A组患者SBP、HR、SpO₂、较B组低。;A组患者围术期不良反应发生率（20.00%）低于B组患者（56.67%）（χ²=25.593,P<0.001）。结论 两种麻醉方案应用于老年无痛胃肠镜,麻醉效果相近,环泊酚复合纳布啡血流动力学更稳定,且围术期不良反应的发生率较低。

Objective To compare the effects of nalbuphine combined with ciprofol and nalbuphine combined with propofol on painless gastroscopy in elderly patients. Methods A total of 180 elderly patients（all underwent painless gastroscopy）admitted to Xiamen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from October 2021 to October 2022 were selected as the study subjects．They were randomly divided into groups using a random number table method．Among them,90 patients in Group A were given a combination of nalbuphine and ciprofol,while 90 patients in Group B were given a combination of nalbuphine and propofol．Anesthesia related indicators,hemodynamics,and perioperative adverse reactions were compared between the two groups．There was no statistically significant difference in the induction amount,induction time,number of additional times,total additional amount,awakening time,and recovery room stay time between the two groups of patients（t=1.486,0.830,1.157,0.941,0.906,1.403,all P>0.05）．The results of repeated measures analysis of variance showed that there were statistically significant differences among the grouping factors,including SBP（F=30.019,P<0.001）,HR（F=282.057,P<0.001）,SpO₂（F=64.518,P<0.001）,time factors SBP（F=21.780,P<0.001）,HR（F=345．118,P<0.001）,SpO₂（F=41.762,P<0.001）,and interaction factors SBP（F=12.941,P<0.001）,HR（F=193.295,P<0.001）,and SpO₂（F=13.546,P<0.001）．The line chart visually shows that the SBP,HR,SpO₂ of Group A patients were lower than those of Group B．The incidence of perioperative adverse reactions in Group A patients（20.00%）was lower than that in Group B patients（56.67%）（χ²=25.593,P<0.001）. Conclusions The two anesthesia regimens used for elderly painless gastroscopy have similar anesthesia effects,with more stable hemodynamics of ciprofol combined with nalbuphine,and a lower incidence of perioperative adverse reactions．

目的 调查与分析儿童结直肠息肉的临床特征及腹腔镜联合结肠镜下手术对其的治疗效果。方法 选择2019年2月—2021年10月在郑州大学附属儿童医院诊治的98例结直肠息肉患儿,记录患儿的临床特征,根据患儿的手术方法分为腹腔镜组（腹腔镜联合结肠镜下手术治疗,n=40）与结肠镜组（采用结肠镜手术治疗,n=58）,对比不同手术方法的治疗效果、并发症发生率、疼痛视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评分、息肉复发与再手术率。结果 98例患儿中,息肉部位为直肠44例、横直肠38例、其他16例;息肉最大直径（1.65±0.24）cm;息肉单发83例、多发15例。腹腔镜组的围手术期指标比结肠镜组改善（P<0.05）。腹腔镜组术后7 d的感染、出血、肠穿孔、肠梗阻等并发症发生率为5.00%,低于结肠镜组的17.24%（P<0.05）。腹腔镜组术后1个月的总有效率为97.50%,高于结肠镜组的82.76%（P<0.05）。腹腔镜组术后1、3、7 d的疼痛VAS评分低于结肠镜组（P<0.05）。所有患儿术后随访1年,联合的息肉复发率与再次手术率为5.00%、2.50%,均低于结肠镜组的18.97%、13.79%（P<0.05）。结论 儿童结直肠息肉主要位于直肠、横直肠,多为单发,腹腔镜联合结肠镜下手术治疗能促进患儿康复,提高总体治疗效果,也能缓解患儿疼痛,减少并发症的发生,降低随访息肉复发率与再次手术率。

Objective To investigate and analyze the clinical features of children with colorectal polyps and the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery combined with colonoscopy. Methods A total of 98 children with colorectal polyps diagnosed and treated in our hospital from February 2019 to October 2021 were selected as subjects of this study. The clinical characteristics of all children were recorded,and they were divided into the laparoscopic group(laparoscopic surgery combined with colonoscopy,n=40)and the colonoscopy group(colonoscopy,n=58)according to the differences in surgical methods. The therapeutic effect,complication rate,VAS pain score,polyp recurrence and reoperation rate of different surgical methods were compared. Results Among the 98 children,the polyps of 44 cases were in rectum,38 cases in transverse rectum and 16 cases in other sites. The maximum diameter of polyp was(1. 65±0. 24)cm. Polyps were solitary in 83 cases and multiple in 15 cases. The perioperative indexes in the laparoscopic group were significantly improved compared with those in the colonoscopy group(P<0. 05). The incidence of postoperative complications such as infection,bleeding,intestinal perforation and intestinal obstruction was 5. 00% in the laparoscopy group,which was significantly lower than 17. 24% in the colonoscopy group(P<0. 05). The total effective rate of laparoscopic group was 97. 50% one month after operation,which was significantly higher than that of colonoscopy group(82. 76%,P<0. 05). The VAS pain score of the laparoscopic surgery group was significantly lower than that of the colonoscopy group at 1,3 and 7 days after surgery(P<0. 05). After 1 year of follow-up,the combined polyp recurrence rate and reoperation rate were 5. 00% and 2. 50%,which were significantly reduced compared with 18. 97% and 13. 79% in colonoscopy group(P<0. 05). Conclusions The main sites of colorectal polyps in children are rectum and transverse rectum,and most of them are solitary. Laparoscopic and colonoscopic surgery for colorectal polyps in children can promote the recovery of children,improve the overall treatment effect of patients,relieve the pain of children,reduce the occurrence of complications,and reduce the recurrence rate and reoperation rate of follow-up polyps in children.

目的 探讨联合镇静胃肠镜检查在安全性、可行性的效果以及优势方面的临床应用,为优化诊疗流程、方便患者提供科学依据。方法 纳入我院2017年6月—2018年3月行镇静胃肠镜检查的140例患者为研究对象,采用便利抽样法随机分为两组,观察组70例患者行联合镇静胃肠镜检查,对照组70例患者行胃肠镜分次检查。记录并对比分析两组患者的预约时间、检查时长、不适反应、疼痛程度、满意度、检查费用。结果 观察组在预约时间和检查时长、检查后心率变化,患者满意度和检查费用方面,与对照组相比有统计学差异(P＜0.05),而在血压、血氧、镇静及遗忘程度、疼痛程度及不适反应方面无统计学差异(P＞0.05)。结论 联合镇静胃肠镜检查在临床应用方面安全可行,具有便宜、时间少、患者配合度好、符合患者意愿、而且满意度高的优势,值得推广。

Objective To explore the scientific evidence in optimization of diagnosis and treatment process for patients' convenience, we evaluated the clinical effect of gastrointestinal endoscopy with sedation on the safety, feasibility and advantage. Methods We enrolled 140 patients who came to our hospital for gastrointestinal endoscopy from June 2017 to March 2018. We used the convenience sampling method that the patients were randomly divided into two groups: observation group of 70 patients with combined endoscopy, and the control group of 70 patients with seperate endoscopy. We recorded and compared the two groups of patients of appointment time, inspection time, pain degree, patient satisfaction, and cost. Results The two groups were different in the appointment time, inspection time, heart rate changes after endoscopy, patient satisfaction and the costs (P<0.05), while no significant difference was found in blood pressure, blood oxygen degree, sedation, pain degree and discomfort reaction(P>0.05). Conclusion Combined sedative gastrointestinal endoscopy is safe and feasible in clinical application, with the advantages of low cost, less time, good patient cooperation, in line with the wishes of patients, and high satisfaction, which is worthy of popularization.

目的 探讨粪菌移植(FMT)在两种肠镜下盲肠置管术的临床应用。方法 将2016年1月—2017年6月在我院通过肠镜下盲肠置管术进行粪菌移植的200例患者,随机分为A组和B组,各100例。A组采用直接肠镜置管法完成置管,B组采用二次肠镜置管法完成置管,对两组操作的置管成功率、置管时间、平均疼痛评分、并发症等情况进行对比。结果 与A组相比较,B组到达盲肠时间略长但无统计学意义(14.95min vs 15.26min,P=0.68)、疼痛评分低(5.7 vs 4.8,P<0.05)、更低的并发症发生率(6 % vs 23 %,P<0.05)。结论 在粪菌移植内镜下盲肠置管术患者中,采用通过采用二次肠镜置管法与直接肠镜法相比较完成置管手术时间无统计学差异,但置管成功率高、患者的痛苦小、风险低,值得临床推广。

Objective To investigate the clinical application of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in two kinds of colonoscopic cecal catheterization. Methods From January 2016 to June 2017, 200 patients who took colonoscopic cecal catheterization for fecal microbiota transplantation in our hospital were randomly divided into group A and group B, with 100 patients in each group.Group A used direct colonoscopy catheterization to complete catheterization, group B was treated by the second colonoscopy catheterization. The success rate of catheterization, catheterization time, average pain score and complication were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with group A, the time to reach the cecum in group B was slightly longer but not statistically significant (14.95min vs 15.26min,P=0.68). It had lower pain score (5.7 vs 4.8, P<0.05), lower complication rate. Conclusion Among the patients with colonoscopic cecal catheterization for fecal microbiota transplantation, there was no significant difference in the time of catheterization between the second colonoscopy and the direct colonoscopy, but it has the high success rate of catheterization and low pain, low risk, worthy of clinical promotion.

       传统的结肠镜检查质量评估方式具有主观性强、费时费力等缺点。近年来，人工智能（AI）技术在结肠镜检查质量控制方面展现出客观性、即时性、全面性等优势，具有广阔的应用前景。文章全面探讨了AI在结肠镜检查质量控制中的多个应用场景，包括评估肠道准备质量、记录退镜时间、息肉识别和分类、预测早期结直肠癌浸润深度等方面，并通过具体的研究案例和数据分析了AI技术的有效性和优势。AI技术有望在提升结肠镜检查质量、促进结直肠癌的早诊早治方面发挥更加重要的作用，但面对技术、伦理及法规等多方面的挑战，未来需要持续努力，不断优化算法，加强跨学科合作，推动AI技术在医疗领域的健康、快速发展。

     Traditional colonoscopy quality assessment methods have strong subjectivity and are time-consuming．In recent years，artificial intelligence technology has shown objectivity，timeliness，and comprehensiveness in colonoscopy quality control，with broad application prospects．This article comprehensively explores multiple application scenarios of AI in colonoscopy quality control，encompassing assessments of bowel preparation quality，recording of withdrawal times，polyp identification and classification，and prediction of early colorectal cancer invasion depth．Through specific research cases and data analysis，the effectiveness and advantages of AI technology are elucidated．AI technology is expected to play an increasingly significant  role in enhancing the quality of colonoscopy and promoting early diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer．However，facing challenges from technology，ethics，regulations，and other aspects，continued efforts are  needed in the future to continuously optimize algorithms，strengthen interdisciplinary collaboration，and promote the healthy and rapid development of AI technology in the medical field．