目的 统计洛阳市涧西区各作业场的职业病危害因素,分析职业病发生的主要原因,并探讨具体防控策略。方法 收集洛阳市涧西区内2021年1月—2022年12月期间针对各作业场的职业病危害因素监测信息,录入Excel 2010进行数据统计;随机抽取辖区内200名重点职业从业人员,开展回顾性分析,结合职业健康检查结果,将确认存在职业病的115名从业人员列为病例组,其余未发生职业病的85名从业人员列为对照组,比较2组一般资料、临床资料,经统计学单因素、Logistic多因素回归分析归纳可导致职业病发生的影响因素,结合分析结果,探讨具体防控措施。结果 针对辖区内15家厂矿企业,2021年共设立584个监测点,共测得68处锰及其化合物危害、48处矽尘危害、4处苯及其苯系物危害、12处噪声危害,超标率为22.60%（132/584）;2022年共设立1 575个监测点,共测得158处粉尘危害、154处锰及其化合物危害、10处矽尘危害、13处噪声危害,超标率为21.27%（335/1 575）;单因素分析结果显示,2组从业人员的年龄、工作年限、职业类型、体检频率、体检结果等比较差异均存在统计学意义;Logistic多因素回归分析显示,年龄≥50岁,工作年限≥10年,从事制造业、采矿业,未规律体检,血常规异常,免疫力差,X线胸片异常,双耳高频听力阈值≥40 dB均是发生职业病的重要原因（均P<0.05）。结论 洛阳市涧西区的职业危害因素以粉尘、锰及其化合物为主,高龄、工作年限长的制造业、采矿业人员发生职业病的风险相对较高,优化职业病防治措施并规范上述重点人群的职业健康体检能实现对职业病的有效防控。

Objective To analyze the occupational disease hazards in various workplaces in Jianxi District,Luoyang City,and to analyze the main causes of occupational disease occurrence,explore specific prevention and control strategies．Methods Monitoring information on occupational disease hazards in various workplaces within the jurisdiction from January 2021 to December 2022 was collected,Excel 2010 was used for data statistics．Two hundred key occupational employees within the jurisdiction were selected randomly for retrospective analysis．Based on the results of occupational health examinations,115 employees confirmed to have occupational diseases were included in the case group,while 85 employees who did not have occupational diseases were included in the control group．General and clinical data of the two groups were compared,and the influencing factors that could lead to the occurrence of occupational diseases were summarized through statistical single factor and multivariate logistic regression analysis． Combined with the analysis results,specific prevention and control measures were discussed．Results For 15 factories and mining enterprises within the jurisdiction,a total of 584 monitoring sites were established in 2021,and a total of 68 manganese and its compound hazards,48 silica dust hazards,4 benzene and its benzene series hazards,and 12 noise hazards were measured,which the exceeding rate was 22.60%（132/584）．In 2022,a total of 1 575 monitoring sites were established,with a total of 158 dust hazards,154 manganese and its compounds hazards,10 silica dust hazards,and 13 noise hazards detected,which the exceeding rate was 21.27%（335/1 575）．The results of statistical univariate analysis showed that there were certain differences in the age,years of work,occupational type,frequency of physical examinations,and results of physical examinations between the two groups of employees．Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age≥50 years old,working experience≥10 years,engaged in manufacturing and mining industries,irregular physical examinations,abnormal blood routine,immune differences,chest X-ray abnormalities,and binaural high-frequency hearing threshold≥40 dB were all important reasons for the occurrence of occupational diseases．Conclusions The occupational hazards in this jurisdiction are mainly dust,manganese,and their compounds．The risk of occupational diseases among elderly manufacturing and mining workers with long working years is relatively high．Optimizing occupational disease prevention and control measures and standardizing occupational health examinations for the above-mentioned key populations can achieve effective prevention and control of occupational diseases．

目的 探究不同类型职业病危害因素对暴露工人生命质量的影响。方法 在某市电子制造业、灯饰制造业、金属冶炼业等能够接触到粉尘、铅、苯以及噪声的6家企业中,采用整群随机抽样法,共计抽取742人为研究对象,对上述企业2015—2017年的职业病危害因素检测报告进行回顾性分析,主要对各企业的职业病危害因素以及暴露水平实施分析,并对企业员工的生命质量情况实施调查。结果 三种不同行业之间的有机溶剂检测合格率比较差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05),其中有机溶剂检测合格率最低的是金属冶炼业;三种不同行业的粉尘检测合格率差异以及噪声检测合格率比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),其中灯饰制造业的噪声及粉尘检测合格率最低;各行业工作人员的生理、社会功能,心理、情感职能,精神健康,身体疼痛、活力以及总计健康评分差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),电子制造企业的各项评分均高于金属冶炼业以及灯饰制造业。多重线性回归分析结果发现,电子制造企业的生理与心理健康维度得分均高于灯饰制造业、金属冶炼业,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),且主要与运动锻炼以及所从事的行业有较大关联。结论 不同类型的职业病危害因素暴露水平存在一定差异,企业职工的生命质量也会因此受到不同程度的影响,应对存在噪声、粉尘以及大量使用有机溶剂等职业病危害因素企业作为健康监护的重点。