论著

PENG阻滞使用低浓度罗哌卡因对衰弱患者在髋关节手术的应用

The application of PENG block using low concentration ropivacaine in hip joint surgery for frail patients

:425-432
 
       目的 探讨低浓度罗哌卡因行超声引导下髋关节囊周围神经(PENG)阻滞联合椎管内麻醉对衰弱患者髋关节手术的应用优势。方法 选择行髋关节手术的衰弱患者76例,随机分为两组,A 组(38例)行PENG阻滞联合椎管内麻醉,C 组(38例)行椎管内麻醉。比较两组入室(T0)、摆放体位时(T1)、术后6 h(T2)、术后12 h(T3)、术后24 h(T4)静息和活动状态的数字等级评定量表(NRS)疼痛评分;术后非甾体抗炎药及阿片类药物补救次数;术后 6 h、24 h患侧股四头肌徒手肌力分级(MMT);首次下床活动时间、住院时间。结果 A组T1~T4时刻静息状态NRS疼痛评分分别为2(1,3)分、1(1,2)分、2(1,2)分、3(2,4)分均低于C组的5(4,7)分、4(3,5)分、5(3,6)分、4(2,6)分,比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.001);A组T1~T4时刻活动状态NRS疼痛评分分别为5(4,7)分、3(2,4)分、4(3,5)分、6(4,7)分均低于C组的10(9,10)分、8(6,9)分、8(7,9)分、9(8,10)分,比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。A组在T1~T4时的静息状态NRS疼痛评分低于T0时的(均P<0.01);C组在T1~T4时的静息状态NRS疼痛评分低于T0时的(均P<0.05);A组在T1~T4时的活动状态NRS疼痛评分均低于T0时的(均P<0.001);C组在T1、T2时的活动状态NRS疼痛评分均低于T0时的(均P<0.01)。A组术后非甾体抗炎药及额外阿片类药物补救次数为4(0,8)、2(0,3)次,均低于C组的15(7,19)、5(3,7)次,比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。两组术后 6 h和24 h患侧股四头肌MMT分级、首次下床活动时间和住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 低浓度罗哌卡因PENG阻滞可以有效减轻衰弱患者髋关节手术术后疼痛,不影响其术后下肢肌力。

   Objective To explore the application advantages of low-concentration ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group(PENG)block combined with spinal-epidural anesthesia in hip joint surgery for frail patients.Methods Seventy-six frail patients undergoing hip surgery were randomly divided into two groups:Group A(38 cases)received PENG block combined with intraspinal anesthesia,while Group C(38 cases)received only intraspinal anesthesia.The numerical rating scale(NRS)pain scores of resting and active states were compared between the two groups at the time of entering the room(T0),placing the position(T1),6 hours after surgery(T2),12 hours after surgery(T3),and 24 hours after surgery(T4).Postoperative non-steroidal drugs and opioids remedy times,muscle strength grading(MMT)of quadriceps femoris at 6 hours and 24 hours after operation,and the first time out of bed activity time,hospitalization time were also compared.Results The resting NRS pain scores at T1-T4 in Group A were 2(1,3),1(1,2),2(1,2)and 3(2,4),respectively,which were lower than 5(4,7),4(3,5),5(3,6)and 4(2,6)in Group C,and the difference was statistically significant(all P<0.001).The NRS pain scores at T1-T4 in Group A were 5(4,7),3(2,4),4(3,5)and 6(4,7),respectively,which were lower than 10(9,10),8(6,9),8(7,9)and 9(8,10)in Group C,and the difference was statistically significant(all P<0.001).The resting NRS pain score of Group A at T1-T4 was lower than that at T0(all P<0.01);the resting NRS pain score of Group C at T1-T4 was lower than that at T0(all P<0.05).The NRS pain scores at T1-T4 in Group A were lower than those at T0(all P<0.001);the NRS pain scores at T1 and T2 in Group C were lower than those at T0(all P<0.01).The number of postoperative non-steroidal drugs and additional opioids in group A(4[0,8],2[0,3])was lower than that in Group C(15[7,19],5[3,7]),and the difference was statistically significant(all P>0.001).There was no significant difference in the MMT grade of the affected quadriceps femoris at 6 h and 24 h after operation,the first time of getting out of bed and the number of days of hospitalization between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions Low concentration ropivacaine PENG block can effectively reduce the postoperative pain of hip joint surgery in frail patients without affecting the postoperative lower extremity muscle strength.
论著

罗哌卡因浸润麻醉在胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术后镇痛疗效的临床观察

Clinical observation of ropivacaine infiltration anesthesia for analgesia after thoracoscopic and laparoscopic combined radical resection of esophageal cancer

:30-32
 
目的 研究罗哌卡因阻滞用于胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术后镇痛的临床效果。方法 胸腹腔镜联合食管癌根治术患者60例,分为: 观察组(n=30),缝合切口时用0.25%盐酸罗哌卡因10 mL于切口局部浸润;对照组(n=30) 不做局部浸润麻醉处理;记录二组术后2 h、6 h、12 h、24 h、48 h的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及血浆皮质醇浓度。结果 观察组术后2 h、6 h、12 h VAS评分优于对照组,术后12 h观察组血浆皮质醇浓度低于对照组。结论 罗哌卡因术终阻滞术后12 h内镇痛效果明显。
Objective To evaluate the efficiency of postoperative analgesia with ropivacaine block after thoracoscopic-lapacoscopic esophagectomy (TLE). Methods Totally 60 patients with esophageal cancer underwent TLE were divided into two groups: observation group(n=30)with 0.25% ropivacaine hydrochloride solution 10 mL injection around incision before end of the operation; control group(n=30)without the treatment. The VAS and the plasma Cortisol concentration at 2 h、6 h、12 h、24 h、48 h after surgery were recorded. Results The VAS at 2 h、6 h、12 h after surgery in observation group was higher than that of the control group,but not at 24 h、48 h after surgery. The plasma Cortisol concentration in the observation group was higher than that of in the control at 12 hours postoperatively. Conclusion Ropivacaine block of incision is helpful to have analgesic effect within 12 hours after TLE.
论著

剖宫产术后镇痛应用不同浓度罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞的临床分析

Clinical analysis of different concentrations of ropivacaine transverses abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section

:22-25
 
目的 比较不同浓度罗哌卡因横纹肌阻滞应用于剖宫产术后镇痛的临床效果。方法 选取2015年3月—2016年3月于我院剖宫产的孕妇300例,随机分为A组、B组、C组,每组100例,A组产妇给予质量浓度为1.5 g/L的罗哌卡因1.5 mg/kg,B组产妇给予质量浓度为2 g/L的罗哌卡因1.5 mg/kg,C组产妇给予质量浓度为2.5 g/L的罗哌卡因1.5 mg/kg,同时给予所有产妇镇痛泵辅助镇痛。记录观察所有产妇术后6 h、12 h、24 h、36 h、48 h的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、镇痛泵按压次数、产妇对镇痛效果的满意程度以及腹横肌平面阻滞(TAP)不良反应发生情况。结果 B、C组产妇的VAS评分均低于A组产妇(P<0.05),24 h后C组产妇的VAS评分低于B组产妇(P<0.05);与B、C组产妇相比,A组产妇的镇痛泵按压次数更多,镇痛效果满意度较低(P<0.05),同时B组产妇的镇痛泵按压次数多于C组产妇(P<0.05);3组产妇均未出现术后不良反应。结论 使用质量浓度为2.5 g/L的罗哌卡因横纹肌阻滞进行剖宫产术后镇痛,效果显著、安全性较高,临床中可推广使用。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of different concentrations of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section. Methods 300 cases of pregnant women undergoing cesarean section in our hospital from March 2015 to March 2016 were selected and were randomly divided into group A, group B and group C with 100 cases in each group. The patients in group A were given 0.15% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg, 0.20% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg in group B and 0.25% ropivacaine 1.5 mg/kg in group C, and at the same time all the pregnant women were given analgesic pump assisting analgesia. The pain visual analogue scales (VAS) of the pregnant women were recorded at 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 36 hours after cesarean section and the number of times of analgesia pressing pump were also recorded. The satisfaction degree of analgesic effect and the TAP occurrence of adverse reactions of the patients were also recorded. Results The VAS scores of group B and group C were lower than that of group A(P<0.05). 24 hours after cesarean section, the VAS score of group C was lower than that of group B (P<0.05). Compared with group B and C, the number of times of analgesia pressing pump in group A were more but the analgesic effect of satisfaction was lower (P<0.05), and at the same time the number of times of analgesia pressing pump in group B were more than those in group C (P<0.05). No adverse reactions were found in the three groups. Conclusion The treatment of using of 0.25% of ropivacaine for muscle block for postoperative analgesia after cesarean section is effective and safe, which may be widely used in clinical practice.
论著

右旋美托咪啶联合低浓度罗哌卡因腹横肌膜神经阻滞在老年患者阴式子宫切除术中的应用

Effect of ultrasound-guided subcostal transverses abdominis plane block with dexmedetomidine and low-concentration ropivacaine in elder vaginal hysterectomy

:39-41
 
目的 研究右旋美托咪啶联合低浓度罗哌卡因腹横肌膜神经阻滞在老年患者阴式子宫切除术中应用的有效性及安全性。方法 选择择期行阴式子宫切除术患者40例(ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ级),随机分成两组,选择硬腰联合麻醉下手术,麻醉平面固定后以超声引导给予患者双侧腹横肌膜神经阻滞,Ⅰ组患者选用0.5 μg/kg右旋美托咪啶+0.2%罗哌卡因,每侧20 mL,Ⅱ组以相同方法给予同量生理盐水。记录麻醉前(T0)、麻醉平面确定后(T1)、手术开始(T2)、牵拉子宫(T3)、术毕(T4)患者的HR、MAP、SpO2及NTI评分;评价并记录牵拉反应、术后认知功能障碍及谵妄的发生及患者舒适度及满意度。结果 两组患者一般情况无显著性差异(P>0.05);与I组相比,Ⅱ组HR在T3时刻有显著性降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),牵拉反应评价Ⅰ组评为优的患者个数明显多于Ⅱ组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Ⅰ组舒适度及满意度评定为优的患者个数明显多于Ⅱ组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 右旋美托咪啶联合低浓度罗哌卡因腹横肌膜神经阻滞在老年患者阴式子宫切除术中应用是安全有效的。
Objective To observe the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided subcostal transverses abdominis plane block with dexmedetomidine and low-concentration ropivacaine in elder vaginal hysterectomy. Methods Forty scheduled for vaginal hysterectomy (ASAⅠ~Ⅱ)were randomly assigned to 2 groups. All patients received spinal anesthesia, and ultrasound-guided subcostal transverses abdominis plane block then, Group Ⅰ: 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine and 0.2% ropivacaine 20 mL for each side, and saline was used for Group Ⅱ. HR、MAP SpO2 and NTI scale were recorded at the time points of pre-anesthesia(T0), confirmation of anesthesia plane (T1), beginning of surgery (T2), pulling uterus (T3), surgery end(T4). Effect of dragging reaction, POCD and delirious and degree of comfort and degree of satisfaction of patients were valuated. Results The general condition did not differ between the two groups(P>0.05). Compared to Group Ⅰ, HR of Group Ⅱ at the time point of T3 was significant lower(P<0.05), number of patients with excellent dragging reaction of Group Ⅰ was significant higher (P<0.05)and patients of Group Ⅰ were more comfortable and satisfied than patinents of Group Ⅱ(P<0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound-guided subcostal transverses abdominis plane block with dexmedetomidine and low-concentration ropivacaine is effective and safe for vaginal hysterectomy in elderly female.
临床诊疗

罗哌卡因与布比卡因应用于妊娠期高血压产妇剖宫产腰麻联合硬膜外麻醉的效果比较

Effect comparison between Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine applied in lumber and epidural anesthesia in hypertensive disorder complication pregnancy caesarean section

:69-71
 
目的 对比观察罗哌卡因及布比卡因应用于患有妊娠期高血压的产妇行剖宫产时腰麻联合硬膜外麻醉的临床效果。方法 将103例择期行剖宫产手术的妊娠期高血压患者随机分为罗哌卡因组51例及布比卡因组52例分别采用对应药物进行麻醉,研究两组阻滞效果、心血管系统变化情况及不良反应发生情况。结果 两组间麻醉镇痛效果及优良率比较,差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05)。罗哌卡因组感觉及运动阻滞起效时间较布比卡因组长,运动阻滞恢复时间较布比卡因组短(P<0.05)。心血管系统变化情况比较,麻醉5min、10min时两组收缩压及平均动脉压均降低,但布比卡因组波动更大,两组间比较差异显著(P<0.05),心率及血氧饱和度比较无差异(P>0.05)。罗哌卡因组不良反应出现时间较布比卡因组晚,同时其不良反应发生率较布比卡因组低(χ2=4.1599,P<0.05)。结论 罗哌卡因及布比卡因在阻滞时间上略有差异,麻醉镇痛效果相当,但鉴于妊高症产妇本身心血管系统存在基础问题,运用罗哌卡因对心血管系统的影响较小,安全性更高,更值得推荐使用。
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号