论著
目的 分析团体认知行为干预联合揿针全程护理对胃癌晚期癌痛患者心理状态的影响。方法 选取我院115例胃癌晚期癌痛患者(2018年3月—2021年1月),依照干预方案不同分为3组。对照1组(37例)接受团体认知行为干预,对照2组(38例)接受揿针全程护理干预,观察组(40例)接受团体认知行为干预联合揿针全程护理干预,比较3组干预效果。结果 疼痛爆发时疼痛缓解情况:观察组疼痛爆发时疼痛缓解率均较对照1组、对照2组高(P<0.05);心理状态:干预1个月后,3组心理状态均得到改善,且观察组汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分均较对照1组、对照2组低(P<0.05);护理满意度:与对照1组、对照2组对比,观察组护理满意度较高(P<0.05)。结论 团体认知行为干预联合揿针全程护理应用于胃癌晚期癌痛患者,能有效缓解疼痛,改善心理状态,且护理满意度高。
Objective To analyze the effect of group cognitive behavior intervention combined with whole-process nursing of pressing needle on the psychological state of patients with advanced gastric cancer pain. Methods A total of 115 patients with advanced gastric cancer pain in our hospital (from March 2018 to January 2021) were selected and divided into 3 groups according to different intervention methods. Control group 1 (37 cases) received group cognitive behavioral intervention, control group 2 (38 cases) received whole-course nursing intervention of pressing needle, and observation group (40 cases) received whole-process nursing intervention of group cognitive behavioral intervention combined with pressing needle. The intervention effects of the three groups were compared. Results Pain relief when pain burst: the pain relief rate of observation group was higher than control group 1 and control group 2 (P<0.05). Mental state: after 1 month of intervention, the mental state of the 3 groups was improved, and the scores of Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) in the observation group were lower than those in control group 1 and control group 2 (P<0.05). Nursing satisfaction: compared with control group 1 and control group 2, nursing satisfaction of observation group was higher (P<0.05). Conclusions Group cognitive behavior intervention combined with whole-process nursing of pressing needle applied to patients with advanced gastric cancer pain could effectively relieve pain, improve psychological state, and nursing satisfaction.