《广州医药》
点击关注官方服务号追踪稿件状态

【重要服务提醒】《广州医药》杂志服务号已上线稿件查询功能

各位作者、审稿专家:
本刊官方微信服务号新增稿件状态查询服务,无需反复登录投稿系统,微信即可随时查看审稿进度、修回通知、录用结果,稿件更新实时推送提醒,同步接收期刊征稿、学术资讯。

操作方式

微信搜索关注广州医药杂志服务号 → 点击菜单栏「绑定账号」→ 输入投稿邮箱完成账号关联;请关闭微信消息免打扰,避免遗漏稿件通知。

《广州医药》编辑部

广州医药杂志服务号
论著

IPF、H-IPF在血流感染中的应用价值

Application value of IPF and H-IPF in bloodstream infection

:36-41
 
目的 研究未成熟血小板分数(IPF)、高荧光未成熟血小板比例(H-IPF)指标在血流感染中的早期诊断价值。方法 选取2020年7月—2021年1月广州市第一人民医院的血培养阳性患者100例作为主要的研究对象,重症病人对照50例,健康对照50例。收集各组患者IPF、H-IPF、大型血小板比率(P-LCR)、血小板体积分布宽度(PDW)、粒/淋、粒/单指标的数值,采用单因素方差分析、构建ROC曲线的方法分析比较各组的IPF、H-IPF、P-LCR、PDW、粒/淋、粒/单比值的差异及其与血流感染效能的关系。结果 IPF、H-IPF、粒/淋、粒/单比值在血流感染组高于其他2组,差异有统计学意义(χ2分别是15.190,10.250,39.490,12.850;P<0.05),而 P-LCR、PDW在3组之间无统计学意义。其中,IPF与H-IPF对血流感染诊断效能较高,其中IPF的AUC为0.855(95% CI为0.737~0.973),H-IPF的AUC为0.845(95% CI为0.722~0.968)。结论 IPF、H-IPF与血流感染密切相关,这2个指标对血流感染患者具有一定的诊断价值。
Objective To explore the early diagnosis value of immature platelet fraction (IPF) and high fluorescent immature platelet fraction (H-IPF) in bloodstream infection.Methods A total of 100 patients with positive blood culture result from July 2020 to January 2021 in Guangzhou First People's Hospital were selected as the research objects,in the mean while,50 critically ill patients and 50 healthy patients were enrolled as two control groups.The values of IPF,H-IPF,platelet-large cell rate (P-LCR),platelet distribution width (PDW),neutrophils/lymphocytes,neutrophils/monocyte ratio of patients in each group were collected,and one-way analysis of variance and ROC curve were used to compare the data,to further analyze their relationship with the bloodstream infection.Results The IPF,H-IPF,neutrophils/lymphocytes,neutrophils/monocyte ratio in the bloodstream infection group were significantly higher than control groups,with statistical significance (χ2=15.190,10.250,39.490,12.850; P<0.05),while P-LCR and PDW had no statistical significance.Among them,IPF and H-IPF were highly effective in diagnosing bloodstream infection,the AUC of IPF was 0.855 (95% CI: 0.737-0.973) and the AUC of H-IPF was 0.845 (95% CI: 0.722-0.968).Conclusions IPF and H-IPF were closely related to bloodstream infection,and these two indicators had a certain value in diagnosing patients with bloodstream infection.
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号