目的 探讨桥小脑角肿瘤微创切除术中应用神经内镜对其功能恢复及预后的影响,以便临床寻找出更有效的治疗方案,进而改善患者预后。方法 本次研究对象为赣州市人民医院2017年6月—2022年1月收治的82例桥小脑角肿瘤患者,用随机数字表法将其分为对照组（41例）和实验组（41例）。对照组患者给予常规显微手术治疗,实验组患者给予神经内镜辅助常规显微手术治疗,2组患者均于术后观察8周。比较2组患者肿瘤全切率,手术时间、住院时间及住院费用,术前及术后2、4、8周格拉斯哥预后量表（GOS）评分,以及术后8周内并发症发生情况。结果 肿瘤全切率：实验组患者术后8周（90.24%）与对照组（73.17%）相比,处于更高水平;手术时间、住院时间：实验组患者与对照组相比,处于更短水平;GOS评分：术前至术后2周,2组患者评分均呈下降趋势,术后2周至8周,2组患者评分呈升高趋势,其中实验组术后2、4、8周与对照组相比,处于更高水平,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;并发症总发生率：术后8周内,实验组患者（4.88%）与对照组（17.07%）相比,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 桥小脑角肿瘤微创切除术中应用神经内镜,可有效缓解患者的临床症状,优化手术相关指标,减轻神经功能受损,提高肿瘤全切率,改善预后,且安全性高。

Objective To investigate the effect of neuroendoscope on functional recovery and prognosis of patients with cerebellopontine angle tumor after microinvasive resection,so as to find out more effective treatment and improve the prognosis of patients．Methods The subjects were 82 patients with cerebellopontine angle tumors admitted to Ganzhou People's Hospital from June 2017 to January 2022．They were divided into control group（n = 41）and experimental group（n = 41）by random number table method．Patients in the control group were treated with conventional microsurgery,while patients in the experimental group were treated with neuroendoscope assisted conventional microsurgery．All patients were observed for 8 weeks after operation．The total tumor resection rate,operation time,hospitalization time,hospitalization expense,Glasgow Outcome Scale（GOS）score before and 2,4,8 weeks after operation,and complications within 8 weeks after operation were compared between the two groups．Results Compared with the control group（73.17%）,the patients in the experimental group had a higher resection removal rate of tumor after 8 weeks of operation（90.24%）．Patients in the experimental group had a shorter operation time and hospital stay than those in the control group．From pre-operation to 2 weeks after operation,the GOS scores of patients in both groups showed a downward trend,and from 2 weeks to 8 weeks after operation,the scores of patients in both groups showed an upward trend,and the patients in the experimental group were at a higher level than those in the control group at 2,4,8 weeks after operation,the difference were statistically significant（P < 0.05）．Within 8 weeks after surgery,there was no significant difference in total incidence of complications between the experimental group（4.88%）and the control group（17.07%,P > 0.05）．Conclusions The application of neuroendoscope in the minimally invasive surgery of cerebellopontine angle tumor can effectively relieve the clinical symptoms of patients,optimize the operation-related indexes,reduce the damage of nerve function,increase the total resection rate of tumor,improve the prognosis,and with high safety．

目的 分析基底节区脑出血患者接受神经内镜手术治疗的疗效。方法 将2019年6月—2020年8月接诊且行开颅血肿清除术的33例基底节区脑出血患者作为对照组,将同期接诊且行神经内镜手术的33例基底节区脑出血患者作为观察组,对组间美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、独立功能量表(FIM)、日常生活能力(ADL)评分、手术情况、血清水通道蛋白4(AQP4)水平、脑水肿体积、并发症情况展开分析。结果 (1)组间NIHSS、FIM、ADL评分在术前无明显差异,P>0.05;术后,观察组NIHSS评分更低,且FIM、ADL评分更高,P<0.05;(2)观察组骨窗大小(2.53±0.66)cm、切口长度(4.22±0.67)cm、术中失血量(47.58±11.25)mL、手术用时(1.58±0.42)h均少于对照组(10.88±1.13)cm、(11.84±2.31)cm、(149.83±33.76)mL、(2.99±0.63)h,且血肿清除率(88.84±9.62)%大于对照组(75.31±7.24)%,P<0.05;(3)观察组术后1周、术后2周、术后1个月时的AQP4水平、脑水肿体积均小于对照组,P<0.05;(4)观察组发生1例并发症(3.03%),对照组发生7例并发症(21.21%),P<0.05。结论 对基底节区脑出血患者进行神经内镜手术治疗,手术创伤小,可以降低AQP4水平,减少脑水肿体积及并发症,提高生活能力,值得推广。

Objective To analyze the curative effect of neuroendoscopic surgery in patients with basal ganglia intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods From June 2019 to August 2020, 33 patients with basal ganglia intracerebral hemorrhage who received craniotomy and hematoma clearance were selected as the control group, and 33 patients with basal ganglia intracerebral hemorrhage who received neuroendoscopic surgery at the same period were selected as the observation group. NIHSS,FIM and ADL scores,details of the surgery, levels of AQP4, brain edema volume and complications were analyzed. Results (1) There were no significant differences in NIHSS, FIM and ADL scores between the two groups before operation, P＞0.05; after operation, NIHSS score of the observation group was lower, and FIM and ADL scores were higher, P＜0.05. (2) Bone window size of the observation group was (2.53±0.66) cm, incision length was (4.22±0.67) cm, intraoperative blood loss was (47.58±11.25) mL, and operation time was (1.58±0.42) h, which were less than those of the control group [(10.88±1.13) cm and (11.84±2.31) cm, (149.83±33.76) mL, (2.99±0.63) h], and the hematoma clearance rate (88.84±9.62)% was higher than that of the control group (75.31±7.24)%, P＜0.05. (3) The AQP4 level and brain edema volume of the observation group 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month after operation were lower than those of the control group, P＜0.05. (4) There was one complication (3.03%) in the observation group and seven complications (21.21%) in the control group,P<0.05. Conclusion Neuroendoscopic surgery for patients with basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhage can reduce the level of AQP4, the volume of brain edema and complications, and improve the ability of life, which is worthy of promotion.

目的 探讨神经导航辅助神经内镜经鼻蝶入路切除垂体瘤的疗效。方法 将2014年10月—2018年4月我院接诊的20例垂体瘤患者纳入本研究,按照随机数字表法均分为观察组和对照组各10例,对照组患者行常规神经内镜下经鼻蝶入路垂体瘤切除术,观察组患者行神经导航辅助神经内镜下经鼻蝶入路垂体瘤切除术,比较两组患者手术及术后住院情况(包括手术时间、术中出血量及术后住院时间)、手术效果(包括显效率和总有效率)、手术前后血清内分泌指标变化情况(包括GH、PRL水平)以及术后并发症情况(即术后并发症发生率)。结果 观察组患者手术时间、术中出血量及术后住院时间均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);观察组显效率和总有效率均略高于对照组,但两组间手术效果并差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);观察组患者治疗后血清生长激素(GH)、催乳素(PRL)水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);两组患者术后并发症发生率无统计学差异。结论 神经导航辅助神经内镜经鼻蝶入路切除垂体瘤疗效显著,手术时间短、术中出血少、术后恢复快,可明显改善患者内分泌指标,值得临床推荐。

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of resection for pituitary tumors through transsphenoidal approach with endoscopic neuronavigation assisted. Methods From October 2014 to April 2018, 10 patients with pituitary tumor were operated in our hospital with neuronavigation, which were set as the observation group. Meanwhile, 10 patients with pituitary tumor underwent surgical treating through transsphenoidal approach without neuronavigation were set as the control group. SPSS 19.0 were used for statistical analysis to compare the difference between the two groups, including the operation time, blood loss, hospitalization time, hormone level, clinical total efficiency, and complications in the two groups. Results The operation time, blood loss and hospitalization time of the observation group were less than that of the control group, and there was statistical significance (P<0.05). The efficiency rate and overall efficiency rate of the observation group were a little more than that of the control group, but there was no statistical significance (P＞0.05). The level of growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) of the observation group were less than that of the control group, and there was statistical significance (P<0.05). And there was no statistical significance between the incidence rate of postoperative complications of the two groups. Conclusion The efficacy of resection for pituitary tumors through transsphenoidal approach with endoscopic neuronavigation is significant, which may shorten the course, reduce the blood loss, quicken recovery of a patient from operation, and improve the hormone level. It is worthy to be recommended to clinical application.

目的 比较分析神经内镜和常规开颅手术在治疗高血压脑出血时的优劣。方法 回顾性分析我院神经外科2015年12月1日—2017年12月31日收治的60例高血压脑出血患者,根据治疗术式的不同,分为对照组和观察组,各30例。对照组行常规开颅手术,观察组给予神经内镜治疗,通过对比两组患者的手术时长、术中出血量、血肿清除率、住院时间、术后并发症及术后6个月随访效果,分析两组优劣。结果 观察组手术时长短于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组血肿清除率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组术后并发症（颅内感染、肺部感染）发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,而两组再次出血及死亡率差异均有统计学意义（P>0.05）;观察组患者术后预后效果优于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 神经内镜在治疗高血压脑出血时对比常规开颅手术具有显著缩短手术时长及住院时间,提高血肿清除率,减少术中出血,降低颅内及肺部感染率等优势,值得临床推广应用。

Objective To compare and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of neuroendoscopy and conventional craniotomy in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods 60 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage admitted to our hospital from December 1,2015 to December 31,2017 were divided into the control group and the observation group,each with 30 cases. The control group underwent conventional craniotomy,and the observation group underwent neuroendoscopic treatment. The length of operation,intraoperative blood loss,hematoma clearance,length of hospital stay,postoperative complications,and follow-up after 6 months were compared between the two groups, to analysis the advantages and disadvantages of both groups. Results The duration of operation in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group （P<0.05）. The intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was less than that in the control group （P<0.05）;The hematoma clearance rate in the observation group was higher than that in the control group （P<0.05）;The incidence of postoperative complications （intracranial infection,lung infection） in the observation group was lower than that of the control group （P<0.05）. There was no statistically significant in rebleeding and mortality between the two groups （P>0.05）. The prognosis of the observation group was better than that of the control group. In the control group,the difference was statistically significant （P<0.05）. Conclusion Neuroendoscope in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage compared with conventional craniotomy may shorten the length of operation and hospital stay,improve hematoma clearance rate,reduce intraoperative bleeding,reduce intracranial and pulmonary infection and other advantages. It is worthy of clinical promotion and application.