目的 对比中成药镇痛活络酊和非甾体抗炎药(Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs,NSAIDs)治疗肱骨外上髁炎(lateral epicondylitis,LE)的短期临床疗效差异。方法 筛选后符合纳入标准的LE患者60例,随机分为镇痛活络酊组(n=30)和NSAIDs组(n=30)。镇痛活络酊组外用镇痛活络酊,NSAIDs组外用法斯通凝胶(酮洛芬),两组均连续用药3周,3次/d。用药后3 周、6 周和12 周连续随访,主要观测指标包括视觉模拟评分(visual analog scale,VAS);肩、肘和手的功能评分(Disabilities of the arm, Shoulder And Hand,DASH);无痛握力(Pain-free grip strength,PFGS)。VAS评分分别测量患者1周前用力活动时的VAS评分和正常休息时的VAS评分,记为VAS(活动时)和VAS(休息时)。运用统计学方法对比分析两组患者在VAS评分(活动时)、VAS评分(休息时)、DASH评分和PFGS上的差异。结果 两组患者在VAS评分(活动时)、VAS评分(休息时)和DASH评分上均未见组间差异(P>0.05)。两组患者在用药前、用药后3周、用药后6周的PGFS对比同样无组间差异(P=0.91,P=0.42,P=0.13)。但是,在用药后12周,镇痛活络酊组的PFGS高于NSAIDs组(P=0.02)。结论 镇痛活络酊缓解LE疼痛的效果与外用NSAIDs相当,对提升伸肌力效果则更优。

Objective To compare the short-term clinical effects difference between analgesic tincture and topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis (LE). Methods 60 cases of LE patients were randomly divided into an analgesic tincture group (n=30) and a NSAIDs group (n=30). Analgesic tincture was chosen for the analgesic tincture group and topical ketoprofen gel for the NSAIDs group to treat LE. Two groups were treated continuously for 3w, 3 times/day. Clinical results of each drug were followed-up at the time point of 3w, 6w and 12w after usage. Observational indexes included the visual analogue scale (VAS), disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH) and pain-free grip strength (PFGS). The inter-group difference of VAS (at activity), VAS (at rest), DASH score and PFGS were compared subsequently. Results No difference of the VAS (at activity), VAS (at rest), DASH score were ascertained (P> 0.05) between groups. Inter-group difference of PGFS was also not discerned at the time points of pre-treatment and 3 weeks and 6 weeks (P=0.91, P=0.42, P=0.13) post-treatment. However, PFGS of the analgesic tincture group was found to be higher than that of the NSAIDs group (P=0.02) after 12 weeks post-treatment. Conclusion Effect of analgesic tincture in releasing pain is almost the same to that of tropical NSAIDs, but a better effect in improving muscle strength.

目的 观察地西他滨与小剂量CAG方案治疗白血病的短期疗效。方法 选取66例AML患者进行前瞻性研究,按随机数表法分为观察组与对照组,各33例。观察组采取地西他滨与小剂量CAG方案进行治疗,对照组采取标准CAG方案,两组接受相同的支持治疗,均治疗1个疗程。比较两组化疗结束后4周的完全缓解率(CRR)、总缓解率(ORR)、红细胞输注量、血小板输注量、抗生素应用情况、不良反应发生率。结果 观察组CRR与CRR分别为69.70%与81.82%,高于对照组39.40%与57.58%（P<0.05）。两组红细胞输注量、血小板输注量、抗生素应用次数的差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。两者均未见肾功能损伤与治疗相关死亡患者。两组肝功能异常与恶心呕吐总发生率的差异及血小板减少与粒细胞缺乏的严重程度均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论 地西他滨联合小剂量CAG方案治疗白血病可提高疗效,且不增加不良反应,是治疗AML的有效方案之一。