目的 探讨电针联合低频电刺激对中风后上肢弛缓瘫患者上肢功能重建的影响。方法 选择2019年10月—2022年2月期间我院收治的100例中风后上肢弛缓瘫患者,按随机数字表法分为对照组（C组）和观察组（O组）,各50例。C组实施电针治疗,O组在C组基础上增加低频电刺激。对比2组的上肢肌群RMS值、徒手肌力、上肢功能。结果 入组时2组的腕屈伸肌群均方根值（RMS）对比无差异（P>0.05）,干预1、2、3、4周后,O组的腕屈伸肌群RMS值高于C组（P<0.05）。干预4周后,O组的徒手肌力优于C组（P<0.05）。O组的Fugl-Meyer -上肢功能、Wolf 上肢运动功能评定（WMFT）得分高于C组（P<0.05）。结论 在电针治疗基础上联合低频电刺激能显著改善中风后上肢弛缓瘫患者的徒手肌力,增加患肢的肌电值,促进上肢功能恢复。

目的 研究电针治疗对重性抑郁障碍患者的抑郁状态的影响。方法 本研究共分为3组,药物组、和药物+电针组及对照组(每组各50 例),药物组给予艾司西酞普兰抗抑郁治疗连续6周,药物+电针组在给予艾司西酞普兰抗抑郁治疗的基础上,进行电针治疗6周。比较治疗前后三组的HAMD 24 项评分,并对三组的HAMD 24 项评分与血清细胞炎症因子IL-1β、IL-2、IL-6、TNF-α水平进行相关性分析。采用多元逐步回归法,分析影响基线药物组和药物+电针组HAMD 24 项评分的主要因素。结果 与治疗前比较,药物组和药物+电针组患者治疗后HAMD 24 项评分均降低,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05或P＜0.01),与药物组比较,治疗后药物+电针组HAMD 24 项评分较低,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05或P＜0.01)。药物组HAMD 24 项评分与血清细胞炎症因子IL-6(r=0.335,P<0.001)、TNF-α(r=0.269,P<0.001)、IL-2(r=0.257,P=0.001)和IL-1β(r=0.205,P=0.021)呈正相关。药物+电针组HAMD24 项评分与血清细胞炎症因子IL-6(r=0.338,P<0.001)、TNF-α(r=0.271,P<0.001)、IL-2(r=0.255,P=0.015)和IL-1β呈正相关(r=0.208,P=0.026)。影响药物组HAMD24 项评分的主要因素有:血清细胞炎症因子IL-6、TNF-α、IL-1β、IL-2、婚姻(已婚)、文化程度(受教育年限少),标准化回归系数分别为0.585、0.516、0.452、0.318、-0.290、0.262(P＜0.05或P＜0.01)。影响药物+电针组HAMD24 项评分的主要因素有:血清细胞炎症因子IL-6、TNF-α、IL-2、IL-1β、婚姻(已婚)、文化程度(受教育年限少),标准化回归系数分别为0.592、0.521、0.448、0.323、-0.295、0.271(P＜0.05或P＜0.01)。结论 药物联合电针治疗能有效改善重性抑郁障碍患者的抑郁状态,细胞炎症因子与HAMD24 项评分相关,可影响重性抑郁障碍患者的抑郁状态。

Objective To explore the effect of electroacupuncture on patients with severe depression. Methods Patients was divided into three groups, acupuncture group, drug group and the control group. Each group had 50 patients. The drug group was treated with escitalopram for 6 weeks.The acupuncture group were treated with escitalopram and electroacupuncture for 6 weeks. We compared the HAMD24 among 3 groups before or after treatment. The correlation of the levels of IL-1 β, IL- 2, IL- 6, TNF-α and the total HAMD24 score among 3 groups were taken by the correlation analysis. And the main factors influencing the total HAMD24 score before the study were analyzed by the multiple inear step regression method. Results Compared with the pre-treatment group, the HAMD score of the drug group and the acupuncture group decreased after treatment, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05 or P<0.01). Compared with the drug group, the HAMD score of the acupuncture group was lower after treatment; the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The drug group, HAMD scores were positively correlated with IL- 6, TNF-α, IL- 2 and IL-1 β (r=0.335, 0.269, 0.257 and 0.205, respectively, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The acupuncture group HAMD scores were positively correlated with IL- 6, TNF-α, IL- 2 and IL-1 β(r=0.338, 0.271, 0.255 and 0.208, respectively, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The main factors influencing the HAMD score before the study included: serum cytokines IL- 6, TNF-α, IL β, IL- 2, marriage and education. The standardized regression coefficients were 0.585,- 0.516, 0.452, 0.318, 0.290, 0.262, respectively (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The main factors influencing the HAMD score of the drug group before the study included: serum cytokines IL- 6, TNF-α, IL β, IL- 2, marriage and education. The standardized regression coefficients were 0.585,- 0.516, 0.452, 0.318, 0.290, 0.262, respectively (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The main factors of the acupuncture group influencing the HAMD score before the study included: serum cytokines IL- 6, TNF-α, IL β, IL- 2, marriage and education. The standardized regression coefficients were 0.592,0.521,0.448,0.323,- 0.295,0.271(P＜0.05 or P＜0.01). Conclusion Escitalopram combination with electroacupuncture may improve the the depressive state. Inflammatory cytokines were associated with HAMD24 scores and it affects the depressive state of patients with major depressive disorder.

目的 观察电针联合重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗对卒中后抑郁伴失眠患者的疗效并探讨这种联合治疗的机制。方法 对83例PSD患者随机分为rTMS组28例、电针联合rTMS治疗组25例及药物治疗组30例。电针联合rTMS组在对患者进行rTMS治疗基础上予电针治疗2周,并常规给予选择性五羟色胺重摄取抑制剂(SSRI)草酸艾司西酞普兰抗抑郁药物治疗;rTMS组仅采用重复经颅磁刺激治疗2周;药物组给予同种抗抑郁剂治疗。三组于治疗前及治疗2周后接受17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和匹茨堡睡眠量表(PSQI)评估及多导睡眠监测(PSG)。结果 三组的HAMD评分、PSQI评分及睡眠参数在治疗基线水平均无明显差异。2周后不同治疗组间HAMD计分降低值总体差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。药物治疗组HAMD计分降低值小于rTMS组和电针联合rTMS组(P<0.05),电针联合rTMS组HAMD计分降低值大于药物组及rTMS组(P<0.05);组间PSQI计分降低值总体差异有统计学意义 (P<0.05)。电针联合rTMS组PSQI计分降低值大于药物组及rTMS组(P<0.05),而药物组及rTMS组之间的PSQI计分降低值无统计学差异(P<0.05);组间PSG中总睡眠时间(F=16.735,P<0.001)及睡眠效率(F=87.548,P<0.001)治疗前后差值总体差异有统计学意义。电针联合rTMS组总睡眠时间的改善优于药物组及rTMS组(P<0.01),而药物组及rTMS组之间总睡眠时间的改善无统计学差异(P<0.05);电针联合rTMS组睡眠效率的提高优于药物组及rTMS组(P<0.001),而药物组及rTMS组之间的睡眠效率的提高无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 电针联合rTMS治疗可显著改善PSD的抑郁情绪、睡眠质量及改善总睡眠时间及睡眠效率,效果优于药物治疗组及rTMS组,体现了电针联合rTMS对PSD治疗的增效作用。

Objective To investigate the effect of electric acupuncture combined with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) treatment of poststroke depression with insomnia and analyze the therapeutic mechanism of this method. Methods 83 patients with PSD were randomly divided into the group of electric acupuncture combined with rTMS (n=32), rTMS group (n=32) and drug treatment group (n=32). The patients in the group of electric acupuncture combined with rTMS were given with the electric acupuncture treatment for 2 weeks on the basis of rTMS treatment, and also were regularly and continuously administrated with antidepressant drug (escitalopram citalopram). The rTMS group were only given with rTMS for 2 weeks, and the patients of the drug treatment group were administrated with the same antidepressant. At the baseline and 2th week, the 17-item Hamilton depression scale (17-HAMD), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and polysomnography (PSG) were evaluated. Results The sleep parameters, PSQI scores and HAMD scores among three groups had no significant difference at baseline. After 2 weeks, the overall difference of HAMD score reduction between different treatment groups was statistically significant (P<0.001). The HAMD score reduction in the drug treatment group was less than that in the rTMS group and the electric acupuncture combined rTMS group (P<0.05), and the HAMD score reduction in the electric acupuncture combined rTMS group was greater than that in the drug group and the rTMS group (P<0.05). The overall difference of PSQI score reduction between groups was significant (P<0.05). The PSQI score reduction value of electric acupuncture combined with rTMS group was greater than that of the drug group and the rTMS group (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the PSQI score reduction value between the drug group and the rTMS group (P<0.05). The overall difference of total sleep duration (F=16.735,P<0.001) and sleep efficiency(F=87.548,P<0.001) evalted by PSG among groups was significant. The changes of both the total sleep duration and sleep efficiency of electric acupuncture combined with rTMS group was greater than that of the drug group and the rTMS group (P<0.001), while there was no significant difference neither in the changes of total sleep duration nor sleep efficiency between the drug group and the rTMS group before and after treatment among the groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Electroacupuncture combined with rTMS treatment may improve the efficacy of depression, sleep quality, the total sleep duration and sleep efficiency of PSD, and the effect is better than that of the drug treatment group and the rTMS group, which reflects the synergic effect of electroacupuncture combined with rTMS on PSD treatment.