目的 评价现有关于干预组仅涉及不同针具针刺或联合常规针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症系统评价的方法学质量,以比较不同针具针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症的治疗效果。方法 通过CNKI（中国知网）、万方数据库、VIP（维普）、PubMed、Web of Science等数据库以及其他相关电子资源,对诊断、治疗腰椎间盘突出症的多种针灸技术进行全面的研究。使用AMSTAR2软件,对所有参与的系统性评估结果进行地分析,并根据不同的检测结果,确定文献筛选标准。通过Revman5.4和Cochrance风险偏倚工具,以及Stata16.0的网格Meta分析,挑选了3 381个满足纳入排除要求的随机对照试验。结果 以Stata 16.0统计软件制作排序图可知,杵针+电针的临床有效率SUCRA=81.6%排名第一;目测类比评分显示,银质针SUCRA（用于评估疗效的指标）=95%,排名第一。结论 根据现有的研究证据,杵针+电针以及银质针优于其他9种干预措施,但确切的结果仍需要大量的随机对照试验来证明。
Objective To evaluate the methodological quality of the existing systematic evaluation of the intervention group involving only different needle sets of acupuncture or combined with conventional acupuncture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation,in order to compare the therapeutic effect of different needle sets of acupuncture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation．Methods Through CNKI,Wanfang database,VIP,PubMed,web of science and other databases as well as other relevant resources,a variety of acupuncture techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation were comprehensively studied．Through the use of AMSTAR2 software,all participating systematic evaluation results were effectively analyzed,and according to different test results,which literature meets the requirements were determined．Through revman5.4,Cochrane risk bias tool,and grid meta-analysis of stata16.0,3 381 RCTs meeting the inclusion and exclusion requirements were selected．Results According to the ranking chart made by stata16.0 statistical software,the clinical effective rate of pestle needle + electroacupuncture ranked first with sucra=81.6%．According to the visual analogy score,the silver needle sucra=95%,ranking first．Conclusions According to the existing research evidence,pestle needle + electroacupuncture and silver needle are better than the other nine interventions,but the exact results still need a large number of randomized controlled trials to prove．
目的 探讨中医药治疗小儿腺样体肥大（AH）的研究现状、研究热点及趋势,为本领域研究者提供借鉴。方法 检索中国知网（CNKI）数据库从2005年1月1日至2024年1月31日中医药治疗小儿腺样体肥大的相关文献。运用Excel 2019分析其发文量,运用CiteSpace 6.2.R6软件分析其作者、机构、关键词。结果 共纳入文献395篇,年发文量整体呈现波动上升的趋势;发文量最多的作者为姜之炎;发文量最多的研究机构为山东中医药大学。初步形成了以姜之炎、俞景茂、阎兆君为核心的研究团队;研究机构以中医类院校及其附属医院为主。高频关键词提示当前研究热点前三位为中医药治疗方法、临床疗效。结论 AH领域研究内容主要以内治法、外治法、作用机制为主;研究热点逐渐从临床研究转向作用机制等实验研究;应用“数据挖掘”“网络药理学”等计算机技术研究AH会成为趋势。
Objective To explore the research status,research hotspots,and trends of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of adenoid hypertrophy in children,to provide a reference for researchers in this field．Methods The relevant literature on the treatment of adenoid hypertrophy in children with traditional Chinese medicine was searched in the CNKI database from January 1,2005,to January 31,2024．Excel 2019 was applied to analyze the number of published papers,and CiteSpace 6.2.R6 software was applied to analyze its authors,institutions,and keywords．Results A total of 395 papers were included,and the annual number of papers showed a fluctuating upward trend．The author with the largest number of papers was JIANG Zhiyan．Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine was the research institution with the largest number of papers．The core research teams including JIANG Zhiyan,YU Jingmao,and YAN Zhaojun were initially formed．The research institutions were mainly Chinese medicine colleges and their affiliated hospitals．High-frequency keywords suggest that the current top three research hotspots were traditional Chinese medicine treatment methods,clinical efficacy．Conclusions The research content in this field is mainly based on internal treatment,external treatment,and mechanism．The focus has gradually shifted from clinical research to experimental research such as mechanism．The application of computer technologies such as “data mining” and “network pharmacology” for this disease will become a trend．
目的 评价现有关于干预组仅涉及不同针具针刺或联合常规针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症系统评价的方法学质量，以比较不同针具针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症的治疗效果。方法 通过CNKI（中国知网）、万方数据库、VIP（维普）、PubMed、Web of Science等数据库以及其他相关电子资源，对诊断、治疗腰椎间盘突出症的多种针灸技术进行全面的研究。使用AMSTAR2软件，对所有参与的系统性评估结果进行地分析，并根据不同的检测结果，确定文献筛选标准。通过Revman5.4和Cochrance风险偏倚工具，以及Stata16.0的网格Meta分析，挑选了3 381个满足纳入排除要求的随机对照试验。结果 以Stata 16.0统计软件制作排序图可知，杵针+电针的临床有效率SUCRA=81.6%排名第一；目测类比评分显示，银质针SUCRA（用于评估疗效的指标）=95%，排名第一。结论 根据现有的研究证据，杵针+电针以及银质针优于其他9种干预措施，但确切的结果仍需要大量的随机对照试验来证明。
Objective To evaluate the methodological quality of the existing systematic evaluation of the intervention group involving only different needle sets of acupuncture or combined with conventional acupuncture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation，in order to compare the therapeutic effect of different needle sets of acupuncture in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation．Methods Through CNKI，Wanfang database，VIP，PubMed，web of science and other databases as well as other relevant resources，a variety of acupuncture techniques for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation were comprehensively studied．Through the use of AMSTAR2 software，all participating systematic evaluation results were effectively analyzed，and according to different test results，which literature meets the requirements were determined．Through revman5.4，Cochrane risk bias tool，and grid meta-analysis of stata16.0，3 381 RCTs meeting the inclusion and exclusion requirements were selected．Results According to the ranking chart made by stata16.0 statistical software，the clinical effective rate of pestle needle + electroacupuncture ranked first with sucra=81.6%．According to the visual analogy score，the silver needle sucra=95%，ranking first．Conclusions According to the existing research evidence，pestle needle + electroacupuncture and silver needle are better than the other nine interventions，but the exact results still need a large number of randomized controlled trials to prove．
