目的 对信息协作平台的社区结直肠癌三级防治及干预体系进行探索与实践。方法 对纳入本次研究的2 492名社区人群进行问卷调查,包括健康人群1 118人,1 374例肿瘤患者。分析健康人群和肿瘤患者关于肿瘤防治知识及途径的认知情况,比较健康人群和肿瘤患者就诊首选医院,了解肿瘤患者就诊流向和行为以及发现患癌的途径。结果 在肿瘤患者中知道癌前病变、早期肿瘤症状、高危人群的比例显著高于健康人群[26.93%(370/1 374)、39.96%(549/1 374)、46.00%(632/1 374)比14.49%(162/1 118)、21.91%(245/1 118)、26.92%(301/1 118)]。健康人群认为肿瘤三级防治网络可行、会参加三级防治网、有必要开展癌症筛查、会参加筛查的比率显著高于肿瘤患者[98.83%(1 105/1 118)、91.95%(1 028/1 118)、98.12%(1 097/1 118)、98.03%(1 096/1 118)比81.95%(1 126/1 374)、79.98%(1 099/1 374)、80.93%(1 112/1 374)、85.95%(1 181/1 374)],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。健康人群把三甲医院视为就诊首选医院的比率显著低于肿瘤患者[32.56%(364/1 118)比86.97%(1 195/1 374)](P<0.05)。肿瘤患者中发现肿瘤及确诊医院、肿瘤复诊、康复医院的选取主要以三甲综合医院为主。在肿瘤患者中因身体不适到医院就诊发现患癌的比率显著高于单位员工体检、自检发现、社区卫生服务中心体检发现的比率。结论 我国目前肿瘤发病率和死亡率正处在快速上升的阶段,利用网络优势,加大肿瘤防治知识的宣传力度,建立社区、区域二级医院、三级医院优势互补的三级肿瘤防控体系,是当前我国肿瘤防治的迫切需求。

Objective To explore and practice the community tertiary prevention and intervention system for colorectal cancer based on information collaboration platform. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among 2 492 community residents which were included in this study, including the healthy crowd of 1 118 people, 1 374 cases of tumor patients. The study was to analyze the knowledge of cancer prevention and treatment in healthy people and cancer patients, to contrast the preferred hospital by healthy people and cancer patients, to acquaint the flow direction in seeking medical service, behavior and way to diagnosis cancer of tumor patients. Results In patients with cancer, the understanding proportion of patients with precancerous lesions, early tumor symptoms, and high risk groups was significantly higher than that in healthy people [26.93% (370/1 374), 39.96% (549/1 374), 46.00% (632/1 374) vs 14.49% (162/1 118), 21.91% (245/1 118), 26.92% (301/1 118)]. In healthy people, the proportion of identification of tumor three-grade prevention and control network, willing to participate in the tertiary prevention and control network, necessity to carry out cancer screening, willing to participate in screening was significantly higher than that in patients with cancer [98.83% (1 105/1 118), 91.95% (1 028/1 118), 98.12% (1 097/1 118), 98.03% (1 096/1 118) vs 81.95% (1 126/1 374), 79.98% (1 099/1 374) and 80.93% (1 112/1 374), 85.95% (1 181/1 374)]. There were significantly differences (P<0.05). Healthy people preferred to choose common hospital instead of 3A hospital as the first choice [32.56% (364/1 118) vs 86.97% (1 195/1 374)] (P<0.05). Discovery and diagnosis of cancer, further consultation, and rehabilitation were mainly carried out in 3A hospital. In patients with cancer, the cancer discovery ratio because of physical discomfort for medical attention was significantly higher than that in unit staff physical examination, self-inspection found, and physical examination in community health service center. Conclusion At present, the incidence and mortality of cancer in our country is in a stage of rapid rising. It's an urgent need for cancer prevention and control in China that making use of the advantage of network to improve the propaganda of the knowledge of cancer prevention and control, and establishing complementary advantages of the tertiary cancer prevention and control system by community, regional hospitals, and 3A hospitals.

目的 研究鳞癌抗原(SCC-Ag)的表达对宫颈癌手术治疗后临床转归的预测价值。方法 选取我院2014年4月—2015年9月实施宫颈癌手术的患者52例,分别于手术前后分析所有患者的鳞癌抗原表达,对患者进行1年的随访,以发生癌细胞转移、复发或死亡为研究终点,比较预后良好的患者与预后差的患者鳞癌抗原的表达的不同。结果 Ia、Ib1、Ib2、IIa、IIb期宫颈癌患者术后SCC-Ag水平较手术前均显著降低(P＜0.05);纳入本次研究的患者宫颈癌术后复发或转移发生率为15.38%,转归良好的患者为84.62%,预后良好的患者术后SCC-Ag水平(0.91±0.27)ng/mL较发生复发或转移的患者(1.37±0.57)ng/ml显著较较低(P＜0.05)。结论 宫颈癌患者术后血清SCC-Ag水平与肿瘤的应答之间具有关联性,术后SCC-Ag水平高的患者复发与转移发生率显著高于SCC-Ag水平低的患者,鳞癌抗原的表达对宫颈癌手术后患者的转归情况具有预测价值,临床应予以重视。

目的 探讨临床常用非侵袭性检查指标诊断膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)的准确性及可靠性。方法 回顾性研究2003年11月—2015年11月在广州市第一人民医院就诊并接受压力—流率测定(PFS)的男性LUTS/BPH患者,以侵袭性的PFS为诊断BOO的“金标准”,以前列腺体积(PV)、移行带体积(TZV)、移行带指数(TZI)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、剩余尿量(PVR)、剩余分数(RF)等非侵袭性检查指标为诊断指标进行诊断试验评价。结果 筛选1319例患者纳入统计分析。以ICS列线图为诊断标准,PV、TZV、TZI、PSA、Qmax、RF、PVR诊断BOO的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.803、0.807、0.698、0.775、0.740、0.679、0.641;以Schaefer列线图为诊断标准,PV、TZV、TZI、PSA、Qmax、RF、PVR诊断BOO的AUC分别为0.806、0.814、0.713、0.773、0.721、0.684、0.642。结论 PV、TZV、TZI、PSA、Qmax、RF、PVR等非侵袭性指标对筛查及诊断中老年男性BOO有一定的参考价值及临床意义,其中TZV、PV、PSA、Qmax的诊断准确性较高。

Objective To evaluate and assess the efficacy and validity of the most common and noninvasive parameters in daily clinical practice for detecting bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in elderly male compared with the golden standard pressure-flow study (PFS). Methods Retrospectively analyze the outpatients and inpatients of male LUTS/BPH from November 2003 to November 2015 in Guangzhou First People's Hospital. Collect the PFS parameters and other noninvasive parameters including PV, TZV, TZI, PSA, Qmax, RF, and PVR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the efficiency of each parameter for detecting BOO. Statistic analyses were performed using SPSS (Version 21). Results The data from 1319 patients were analyzed. According to the ICS-nomogram. The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) of PV, TZV, TZI, PSA, Qmax, RF, and PVR for detecting BOO were 0.803, 0.807, 0.698, 0.775, 0.740, 0.679, and 0.641, respectively. According to the Schaefer's nomogram, the AUCs of PV, TZV, TZI, PSA, Qmax, RF, and PVR for detecting BOO were 0.806, 0.814, 0.713, 0.773, 0.721, 0.684, and 0.642, respectively. Conclusion PV, TZV, TZI, PSA, Qmax, RF, and PVR would help predicting BOO in elderly male noninvasively, and providing valuable reference and guidance in clinical decision. TZV, PV, PSA and Qmax supply preferable accuracy for detecting BOO, with better sensitivity and specificity.

目的 探讨OAB与CP/CPPS的症状及诊断的重叠情况,为临床诊疗提供参考。方法 151例中青年男性患者入选为研究对象,按OAB及CP/CPPS的定义及诊断标准将其分为OAB组、CP/CPPS组及OAB+CP/CPPS组,并对OAB+CP/CPPS组进行诊断性治疗对研究对象进行明确诊断;根据年龄分为:18~25岁组、26~35岁组和36~49岁组,比较各年龄组患者OAB及CP/CPPS的重叠情况;对各组患者的临床症状进行分析比较,了解其重叠情况。结果 在151例研究对象中,可诊断为OAB、CP/CPPS、OAB+CP/CPPS的分别有62例(41.06%)、32例(21.19%)、57例(37.75%),因此OAB与CP/CPPS的诊断重叠率为37.75%,明显大于CP/CPPS患者的诊断率;各年龄组间诊断重叠率无差异(P>0.05);症状的重叠方面,OAB+CP/CPPS组有尿急、尿频、夜尿症、急迫性尿失禁、尿不尽感、排尿困难、泌尿生殖系疼痛和或不适症状的分别为57例(100.00%)、50例(87.72%)、21例(36.84%)、2例(3.51%)、12例(21.05%)、2例(3.51%)、57例(100.00%),其中,尿急、尿频及泌尿生殖系疼痛或不适症状的重叠率最高;OAB+CP/CPPS组经诊断性治疗后诊断为OAB患者约61.40%,而CP/CPPS患者为38.60%。结论 OAB与CP/CPPS两者间有相当高的重叠率且远高于CP/CPPS的诊断率,在OAB与CP/CPPS两者诊断重叠的患者中为OAB的可能性更大。

Objective To explore symptoms and diagnosis of overlap between OAB and CP/CPPS, providing reference for clinical treatment. Methods 151 cases of young men were enrolled in the study. According to the definition and diagnostic criteria of OAB and CP/CPPS, we divided the study subjects into OAB group, CP/CPPS group and OAB+CP/CPPS group. And OAB+CP/CPPS group would get a two-week diagnostic treatment to study a clear diagnosis. We also divided the subjects into 18-25 age group, 26-35 year-old age group and 36-49 group according to the age, comparing the overlap of OAB and CP/CPPS in different age groups. The symptoms of the subjects in each group were analyzed to compare and study the overlap. Results Among these 151 cases, 62 cases (41.06%) can be diagnosed as OAB, 32 cases (21.19%) as CP/CPPS, 57 cases (37.75%) as OAB+CP/CPPS. Therefore, OAB and CP/CPPS diagnostic overlap was 37.75%, significantly higher than the diagnosis of CP/CPPS patients; no significant difference (P>0.05) among all age groups diagnostic overlap rate; overlapping terms of symptoms, OAB + CP/CPPS group urgency, urinary frequency, nocturia, urgency incontinence, urine not the flu, difficulty urinating, or genitourinary pain and discomfort were 57 cases (100.00%), 50 cases (87.72%), 21 cases (36.84%), 2 cases (3.51%), 12 cases (21.05%), 2 cases (3.51%), 57 patients (100.00%), which overlap ratio urgency, frequency, and genitourinary pain or discomfort was high; OAB+CP/CPPS group after diagnosis diagnostic treatment of OAB patients was about 61.40%, while CP/CPPS patients was 38.60%. Conclusion There is high overlap rate between OAB and CP/CPPS, which is much higher than the diagnostic rate of CP/CPPS. It is likely to have an OAB when a patient is diagnosed as OAB or CP/CPPS at the same time.