论著

广州地区儿童2019新型冠状病毒感染筛查/疑似病例129例临床特征分析

Analysis of clinical characteristics of 129 children screening/suspected 2019-nCoV infection in Guangzhou

:12-19
 
目的 探讨广州地区儿童2019新型冠状病毒(2019 novel coronavirus, 2019-nCoV)感染筛查/疑似病例的流行病学特点、发病特点、可能的原因及防控建议。方法 回顾性分析2020年1月20日—2020年2月29日广州市唯一一家儿童2019-nCoV感染隔离定点医疗单位隔离病房收治住院的符合儿童2019-nCoV感染筛查/疑似病例129例,对其流行病学、发病特点、临床特征、实验室检查及转归、随访等进行总结分析。 结果 男 79例,女 50例,最小1个月,最大13岁,中位数2岁,51例(39.5%)有武汉疫区旅游或居住史,20例(15.5%)有与来自疫区有呼吸道症状人员接触史,17例(13.1%)周边或社区有确诊病例,3例(2.3%)有确诊病人接触史(其中2例为家庭确诊病例密切接触史),38例(29.5%)为临床符合或聚集性发病;临床症状:发热121例(93.8%),咳嗽92例(71.3%),流涕50例(38.8%),32例伴有腹泻、呕吐/腹痛(24.8%),102例(79.0%)白细胞降低或正常,C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)<20 mg/L有103例(79.8%),57例(44.2%)胸片或CT示肺部斑片状影或实变;病原学检查:2019-nCoV实时荧光定量反转录PCR检测结果:所有患儿及陪同家属都有行咽拭子检查,只有21例患儿(16.3%)有行肛拭子检查,仅有1例(0.78%)家庭确诊病例密切接触者肛拭子阳性,但连续多次咽拭子结果阴性,余患者肛拭子和咽拭子及陪同家属咽拭子结果均阴性。其他病原学检查结果61例(47.3%),包括14例RSV阳性,9例流感病毒A,8例人偏肺病毒,6例肠道病毒,6例流感病毒B,6例肺炎支原体,4例副流感病毒1型,1例副流感病毒3型,2例人博卡病毒,3例腺病毒,1例肺炎克雷伯菌,1例人型葡萄球菌,其中1例合并副流感病毒1型及人博卡病毒。跟踪唯一1例确诊患者咽拭子多次检查均阴性,肛拭子持续19天后才转阴,一直无任何症状。其余患者好转出院后第3天、7天及14天进行随访,无异常发现。结论 儿童2019-nCoV感染筛查/疑似病例临床多表现为呼吸道或消化道症状,确诊主要依靠核酸检测,新冠病毒感染确诊率极低,而其将近50%病例能找到除新冠病毒外的其它相关病原体;高危患者为密切接触者,但存在漏诊的可能,肛拭子阳性率或高于咽拭子。
Objective To explore the epidemiological characteristics, onset characteristics, pathogenic mechanism of 2019-nCoV infection in children, and its control and prevention in Guangzhou. Methods From January 20, 2020 to February 29, 2020, a retrospective analysis was carried out on 129 suspected cases of 2019-nCoV infection admitted to the isolation ward of the only medical unit designated for children in Guangzhou. The epidemiology, disease characteristics, clinical characteristics, laboratory examination, outcome and follow-up were summarized and analyzed. Results There were 79 males and 50 females, with a minimum age of 1 month and a maximum age of 13 years. Anong them, 51 cases (39.5%) had a history of tourism or residence in the epidemic area of Wuhan, 20 cases (15.5%) had a history of contact with people with respiratory symptoms from the epidemic area, 17 cases (13.1%) with a confirmed case in the surrounding area or community, 3 cases (2.3%) had a history of contact with a confirmed patient (2 of them were family clustering cases), 38 cases (29.5%) were clinically suspected cases. Clinical symptoms: 121 cases with fever (93.8%), 92 cases with coughing (71.3%), 50 cases with runny nose (38.8%), 32 cases with diarrhea, vomiting or abdominal pain (24.8%). In 102 cases (79.0%), white blood cells were decreased or normal, 103 cases (79.8%) with CRP<20 mg/L, and 57 cases (44.2%) showed focal infection on chest X-ray or CT scan. Etiological examination: only one case (0.78%) of the family confirmed cases had positive anal swab result, but the throat swab results were negative all the time. The anal swab and throat swab results of other patients and the throat swab results of their accompanying family members were negative. Other pathogens were detected in 61 cases (47.3%), including 14 RSV positive cases, 9 influenza A positive cases, 8 human metapneumovirus positive cases, 6 enterovirus positive cases, 6 influenza B positive cases, 6 Mycoplasma pneumoniae positive cases, 4 parainfluenza virus type 1 positive cases, 1 parainfluenza virus type 3 positive cases, 2 human bocavirus positive cases, 3 adenovirus positive cases, 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae positive cases, 1 Human Staphylococcus positive case, and 1 case with parainfluenza virus type 1 and human bocavirus. The only confirmed patient was followed up while multiple pharyngeal swab results were negative, and the positive anal swab results lasted for 19 days before turning negative and remained asymptomatic. Other patients were followed up on the 3rd, 7th and 14th day after discharge, and no abnormal findings were found. Conclusion Screening/suspected cases of 2019-nCoV infection in children were mostly clinically manifested as respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms. The diagnosis rate of nucleic acids was extremely low, and there was a possibility of missed diagnosis. Nearly 50% of cases could find other relevant pathogens excluding the 2019-nCoV. The positive rate of anal swab results was higher than that of pharyngeal swab.
论著

腹腔镜下卵巢癌减灭术联合化疗治疗卵巢癌的疗效观察

Laparoscopic ovarian cancer reduction combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer

:45-47
 
目的 探讨腹腔镜下卵巢癌减灭术联合化疗治疗卵巢癌的疗效。方法 选取2018年2月—2020年2月我院收治的68例卵巢癌患者,随机分为研究组和对照组各34例,对照组给予腹腔镜下卵巢癌减灭术,研究组给予腹腔镜下卵巢癌减灭术联合化疗。观察分析两组患者近期疗效、不良反应发生率、生存率以及相关手术情况等。结果 研究组近期疗效优于对照组(P<0.05);研究组术后1年生存率高于对照组(P<0.05),且并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05);研究组理想减灭率优于对照组(P<0.05),且腹水量及术中出血量少于对照组(P<0.05),手术时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 减灭术联合化疗治疗卵巢癌可有效增强治疗疗效,降低多种化疗不良反应发生的可能性,并能使生存率得到进一步提升,可推广应用。
Objective To investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic ovarian cancer reduction combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Methods A total of 68 ovarian cancer patients admitted to our hospital from February 2018 to February 2020 were randomly divided into study group and control group, 34 cases each. The control group was given laparoscopic ovarian cancer reduction surgery, while the study group was given laparoscopic ovarian cancer reduction surgery combined with chemotherapy. The short-term efficacy, incidence of adverse reactions, survival rate and related operation of the two groups were observed and analyzed. Results The short-term efficacy of the study group was better than that of the control group (P<0.05). The 1-year postoperative survival rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05), and the incidence of complications was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The ideal reduction rate of the study group was better than that of the control group (P<0.05), and the amount of abdominal water and intraoperative blood loss was less than that of the control group (P<0.05), and the operation time was shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic ovarian cancer reduction combined with chemotherapy can effectively enhance the therapeutic effect, reduce the possibility of multiple adverse reactions of chemotherapy, and further improve the survival rate, which can be popularized and applied.
论著

紫绀型先天性心脏病患儿院际转运145例临床分析

Clinical analysis of interhospital transport for 145 children with cyanotic congenital heart disease

:20-24
 
目的 分析院际转运紫绀型先天性心脏病患儿中的流行病学特征,评价院际转运在患儿救治过程中的作用及效果。方法 回顾性分析2016年1月—2019年12月我院院际转运的145例紫绀型先天性心脏病患儿的性别、年龄、体质量、生命体征、转运期间检测指标、支持治疗等资料。结果 145例紫绀型先天性心脏病男105例,女40例,73.1%(106/145)的转诊患儿是新生儿,59.3%(86/145)的转诊患儿来自三级医院,55.9%(81/145)的转诊患儿转诊距离在200 km以上,仅有10.3%(15/145)的转诊患儿转诊距离在50 km以内。转诊过程中44.1%(64/145)的患儿给予呼吸机辅助通气,33.1%(48/145)的患儿给予吸氧处理,仅22.1%(32/145)的患儿无需呼吸支持,所有患儿安全转运到接诊医院,入院后138例接受外科手术治疗手术康复,7例放弃治疗。结论 安全、有效的院际转运紫绀型先天性心脏病是救治的关键环节,为紫绀型先天性心脏病的救治提供前提。
Objective To analyzed the epidemiological characteristics of interhospital transport of cyanotic congenital heart disease in children and evaluate the effect of interhospital transport on treatment. Methods 145 children with cyanotic congenital heart disease from January 2016 to December 2019 transported in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Epidemiological data such as sex, age, weight, vital signs, detection indexes during transport and supportive treatment were collected. Results Among 145 children with cyanotic type of congenital heart disease there were 105 male, 40 female. 73.1% (106/145) children were newborn, 59.3% (86/145) children were from tertiary hospitals, 55.9% (81/145) children were transported over 200 km, only 10.3% (15/145) children were within 50 km. 44.1% (64/145) were given assisted ventilation during transporting, 33.1% (48/145) children were given oxygen treatment, only 22.1% (32/145) of the children did not need respiratory support. All children were transferred to the receiving hospital successfully. After admission, 138 of them received surgical treatment successfully, and 7 of them gave up treatment. Conclusion Safe and effective interhospital transport is the key to treating cyanotic congenital heart disease, which provides the basis for the treatment of cyanotic congenital heart disease.
出版者信息








《广州医药》公众号