目的 探讨我院17年间前列腺癌患者的临床特征如发病年龄、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、Gleason评分、分期及穿刺阳性率等的变化。方法 采用回顾性分析,对广州市第一人民医院2000—2016年泌尿外科1 231例穿刺活检的患者及564例前列腺癌患者资料进行分析,按患者的诊断时间分为A组(2000—2005年)、B组(2006—2009年)、C组(2010—2012年)、D组(2013—2014年)、E组(2015—2016年),对各组的年龄、PSA、Gleason评分、分期及穿刺活检阳性率进行统计学分析,看各组间的各项指标差异是否有统计学意义。结果 5组年龄均值(73.36,73.74,72.05,73.40,72.96岁)、PSA均值(208.95,190.25,173.19,283.54,148.69 μg/L)及穿刺活检阳性率均值(48%,43%,37%,44%,39%)差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。5组Gleason均值为6.80,6.73,7.12,6.93,7.32,A、B组和E组Gleason评分差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05),其余各组Gleason评分差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。TNM分期转化得分5组均值为5.96,6.80,7.05,7.31,6.83, A和C组、D组、E组差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05),其余各组TNM分期转化得分差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论 17年间前列腺癌患者诊断时的年龄、PSA水平及穿刺活检阳性率没有显著变化。

Objective To investigate changes of inpatients with prostate cancer in the last 17 years such as age of onset, prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, prostate cancer staging and positive rate of prostate biopsy. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted in 1 231 cases of biopsy patients of urology and 564 patients with prostate cancer who were hospitalized in the First People's Hospital of Guangzhou from 2000 to 2016. According to the time of diagnose. All the patients were divided into five groups: group A(2000-2005),group B(2006-2009),group C(2010-2012), group D(2013-2014)and group E(2015-2016). The age, PSA, Gleason score, staging and positive rate of prostate biopsy were compared to realize whether the indicators of the differences between groups was statistically significant. Results In five groups, means of age, PSA, Gleason score and prostate biopsy positive rate are respectively 73.36,73.74,72.05,73.40,72.96 years; 208.95,190.25,173.19,283.54,148.69 μg/L;6.80,6.73,7.12,6.93,7.32; 5.96,6.80,7.05,7.31,6.83 and 48%,43%,37%,44%,39%. There was no significant difference in age, PSA and positive rate of prostate biopsy (P>0.05). The Gleason scores of group A and group E, group B and group E were statistically significant (P<0.05), while the other groups had no significant differences in Gleason score (P>0.05). There werestatistical significancein TNM staging score between group A and group C,group D, group E(P <0.05),while the other groups had nostatistical significance (P>0.05). Conclusion There are no change of prostate cancer patients in diagnosis of age, PSA levels and positive rate of prostate biopsy in the past 17 years.

目的 探讨临床常用非侵袭性检查指标诊断膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)的准确性及可靠性。方法 回顾性研究2003年11月—2015年11月在广州市第一人民医院就诊并接受压力—流率测定(PFS)的男性LUTS/BPH患者,以侵袭性的PFS为诊断BOO的“金标准”,以前列腺体积(PV)、移行带体积(TZV)、移行带指数(TZI)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、剩余尿量(PVR)、剩余分数(RF)等非侵袭性检查指标为诊断指标进行诊断试验评价。结果 筛选1319例患者纳入统计分析。以ICS列线图为诊断标准,PV、TZV、TZI、PSA、Qmax、RF、PVR诊断BOO的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.803、0.807、0.698、0.775、0.740、0.679、0.641;以Schaefer列线图为诊断标准,PV、TZV、TZI、PSA、Qmax、RF、PVR诊断BOO的AUC分别为0.806、0.814、0.713、0.773、0.721、0.684、0.642。结论 PV、TZV、TZI、PSA、Qmax、RF、PVR等非侵袭性指标对筛查及诊断中老年男性BOO有一定的参考价值及临床意义,其中TZV、PV、PSA、Qmax的诊断准确性较高。

Objective To evaluate and assess the efficacy and validity of the most common and noninvasive parameters in daily clinical practice for detecting bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in elderly male compared with the golden standard pressure-flow study (PFS). Methods Retrospectively analyze the outpatients and inpatients of male LUTS/BPH from November 2003 to November 2015 in Guangzhou First People's Hospital. Collect the PFS parameters and other noninvasive parameters including PV, TZV, TZI, PSA, Qmax, RF, and PVR. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the efficiency of each parameter for detecting BOO. Statistic analyses were performed using SPSS (Version 21). Results The data from 1319 patients were analyzed. According to the ICS-nomogram. The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) of PV, TZV, TZI, PSA, Qmax, RF, and PVR for detecting BOO were 0.803, 0.807, 0.698, 0.775, 0.740, 0.679, and 0.641, respectively. According to the Schaefer's nomogram, the AUCs of PV, TZV, TZI, PSA, Qmax, RF, and PVR for detecting BOO were 0.806, 0.814, 0.713, 0.773, 0.721, 0.684, and 0.642, respectively. Conclusion PV, TZV, TZI, PSA, Qmax, RF, and PVR would help predicting BOO in elderly male noninvasively, and providing valuable reference and guidance in clinical decision. TZV, PV, PSA and Qmax supply preferable accuracy for detecting BOO, with better sensitivity and specificity.

目的 探讨群组管理对老年前列腺术后患者下肢活动依从性的效果。方法 将60例患者分为干预组和对照组,对照组按常规护理,干预组实施1周的群组管理活动。结果 干预后干预组患者对预防DVT发生的知晓度、进行下肢主动活动的依从性高于对照组,双下肢皮肤温度、颜色、胀痛等改变显著小于对照组,比较差异均有统计学意义(P＜ 0. 01)。结论 群组管理是一种有效的管理模式,可增强患者的自我效能,提高患者下肢活动的依从性,达到预防DVT发生的作用。

Objective To explore the influence of group management on compliance of lower extremities of elderly patients who underwent prostatectomy. Methods 60 patients were divided into the intervention group and the control group. While the control group was accepted normal nursing, the intervention group was accepted one-week group management. Results The intervention group performed better than the control group in awareness on the prevention of DVT and compliance of activities of lower extremities, and experienced less changes than the control group in skin temperatures, colors and ache of both lower extremities. These changes had statistical significant (P＜0.01). Conclusion Group management is an effective management mode, and improves parents' self-efficacy and compliance of lower extremities, is helping prevent DVT.

目的 探讨OAB与CP/CPPS的症状及诊断的重叠情况,为临床诊疗提供参考。方法 151例中青年男性患者入选为研究对象,按OAB及CP/CPPS的定义及诊断标准将其分为OAB组、CP/CPPS组及OAB+CP/CPPS组,并对OAB+CP/CPPS组进行诊断性治疗对研究对象进行明确诊断;根据年龄分为:18~25岁组、26~35岁组和36~49岁组,比较各年龄组患者OAB及CP/CPPS的重叠情况;对各组患者的临床症状进行分析比较,了解其重叠情况。结果 在151例研究对象中,可诊断为OAB、CP/CPPS、OAB+CP/CPPS的分别有62例(41.06%)、32例(21.19%)、57例(37.75%),因此OAB与CP/CPPS的诊断重叠率为37.75%,明显大于CP/CPPS患者的诊断率;各年龄组间诊断重叠率无差异(P>0.05);症状的重叠方面,OAB+CP/CPPS组有尿急、尿频、夜尿症、急迫性尿失禁、尿不尽感、排尿困难、泌尿生殖系疼痛和或不适症状的分别为57例(100.00%)、50例(87.72%)、21例(36.84%)、2例(3.51%)、12例(21.05%)、2例(3.51%)、57例(100.00%),其中,尿急、尿频及泌尿生殖系疼痛或不适症状的重叠率最高;OAB+CP/CPPS组经诊断性治疗后诊断为OAB患者约61.40%,而CP/CPPS患者为38.60%。结论 OAB与CP/CPPS两者间有相当高的重叠率且远高于CP/CPPS的诊断率,在OAB与CP/CPPS两者诊断重叠的患者中为OAB的可能性更大。

Objective To explore symptoms and diagnosis of overlap between OAB and CP/CPPS, providing reference for clinical treatment. Methods 151 cases of young men were enrolled in the study. According to the definition and diagnostic criteria of OAB and CP/CPPS, we divided the study subjects into OAB group, CP/CPPS group and OAB+CP/CPPS group. And OAB+CP/CPPS group would get a two-week diagnostic treatment to study a clear diagnosis. We also divided the subjects into 18-25 age group, 26-35 year-old age group and 36-49 group according to the age, comparing the overlap of OAB and CP/CPPS in different age groups. The symptoms of the subjects in each group were analyzed to compare and study the overlap. Results Among these 151 cases, 62 cases (41.06%) can be diagnosed as OAB, 32 cases (21.19%) as CP/CPPS, 57 cases (37.75%) as OAB+CP/CPPS. Therefore, OAB and CP/CPPS diagnostic overlap was 37.75%, significantly higher than the diagnosis of CP/CPPS patients; no significant difference (P>0.05) among all age groups diagnostic overlap rate; overlapping terms of symptoms, OAB + CP/CPPS group urgency, urinary frequency, nocturia, urgency incontinence, urine not the flu, difficulty urinating, or genitourinary pain and discomfort were 57 cases (100.00%), 50 cases (87.72%), 21 cases (36.84%), 2 cases (3.51%), 12 cases (21.05%), 2 cases (3.51%), 57 patients (100.00%), which overlap ratio urgency, frequency, and genitourinary pain or discomfort was high; OAB+CP/CPPS group after diagnosis diagnostic treatment of OAB patients was about 61.40%, while CP/CPPS patients was 38.60%. Conclusion There is high overlap rate between OAB and CP/CPPS, which is much higher than the diagnostic rate of CP/CPPS. It is likely to have an OAB when a patient is diagnosed as OAB or CP/CPPS at the same time.