目的 探讨免疫治疗联合化学治疗（化疗）对晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）患者淋巴免疫及生活质量的影响,为临床进一步治疗提供参考。方法 选择2021年6月—2023年6月天津市滨海新区大港医院收治的晚期NSCLC患者120例进行研究,按抽签法分为干预组及对照组,每组60例,对照组采取单纯化疗方案,干预组采取免疫联合化疗方案,对比两组临床疗效、药物不良反应,治疗前后免疫功能（CD3⁺、CD4⁺、CD8⁺）、糖类抗原199（CA199）、糖类抗原 125（CA125）、血清癌胚抗原（CEA）水平及健康状态调查表（QOL）评分。结果 干预组患者治疗总有效率高于对照组（68.33%>41.67%,P<0.05）;治疗后干预组患者CD3⁺、CD4⁺比例高于治疗前及对照组治疗后,CD8⁺比例低于治疗前及对照组治疗后（P<0.05）;治疗后干预组血清CA199、CA125、CEA水平均低于治疗前及对照组治疗后（P<0.05）;干预组药物不良反应发生率为16.67％,对照组为36.67％,干预组低于对照组（P<0.05）;治疗后干预组QOL各维度评分高于对照组及治疗前（P<0.05）。结论 与单纯化疗相比,免疫联合化疗治疗晚期NSCLC患者,能有效降低肿瘤标志物水平,改善患者免疫指标,减轻药物不良反应,提高患者疗效及生活质量。

Objective To explore the effect of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy on lymphatic immunity and quality of life of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer（NSCLC）,and to provide reference for further clinical treatment. Methods A total of 120 patients with NSCLC from June 2021 to June 2023 were selected and divided into observation group and control group evenly according to the method of drawing lots,control group was treated with chemotherapy,the observation group was treated with immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy,and the clinical efficacy and adverse drug reactions were compared between the two groups．Before and after treatment,immune function（CD3⁺,CD4⁺,CD8⁺）,carbohydrate antigen 199（CA199）,carbohydrate antigen 125（CA125）,serum carcinoembryonic antigen（CEA）levels and health status questionnaire（QOL-RRB- scores）were measured．Results The total effective rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group（68.33%>41.67%,P<0.05）．After treatment,the ratios of CD3⁺ and CD4⁺ in the observation group were significantly higher than those before treatment and control group after treatment,and the ratio of CD8⁺ was significantly lower than that before and after treatment in the control group（P<0.05）．After treatment,the serum levels of CA199,CA125 and CEA in the observation group were lower than those before and after treatment in the control group（P<0.05）．The incidence of adverse drug reactions was 16.67% in the observation group and 36.67% in the control group,which was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group（P<0.05）．After treatment,the QOL scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group and before treatment（P<0.05）．Conclusions Compared with chemotherapy alone,immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can effectively reduce the levels of tumor markers,improve the immune indexes of patients,reduce the adverse drug reactions,and improve the efficacy and quality of life of patients with advanced NSCLC．

目的 比较榄香稀和顺铂胸腔灌注治疗肺癌恶性胸腔积液的疗效。方法 肺癌合并恶性胸腔积液患者56例,榄香稀组29例:胸腔内注射榄香烯400 mg+地塞米松10 mg+2%普鲁卡因10 mL;顺铂组27例:顺铂80 mg+地塞米松10 mg。每周1次,治疗4周。同时记录不良反应。结果 56例均可评价疗效,榄香稀组完全缓解11例,部分缓解14例,有效率86.2%。顺铂组完全缓解6例,部分缓解10例,有效率59.3%,差异有统计学意义,榄香稀组生活质量较顺铂组改善。结论 榄香稀治疗恶性胸腔积液疗效好,可提高生活质量,毒副反应小。

       目的   探讨免疫治疗联合化学治疗（化疗）对晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）患者淋巴免疫及生活质量的影响，为临床进一步治疗提供参考。方法  选择2021年6月—2023年6月天津市滨海新区大港医院收治的晚期NSCLC患者120例进行研究，按抽签法分为干预组及对照组，每组60例，对照组采取单纯化疗方案，干预组采取免疫联合化疗方案，对比两组临床疗效、药物不良反应，治疗前后免疫功能（CD3⁺ 、CD4⁺ 、CD8⁺ ）、糖类抗原199（CA199）、糖类抗原 125（CA125）、血清癌胚抗原（CEA）水平及健康状态调查表（QOL）评分。结果  干预组患者治疗总有效率高于对照组（68.33%＞41.67%，P＜0.05）；治疗后干预组患者CD3⁺ 、CD4⁺ 比例高于治疗前及对照组治疗后，CD8⁺ 比例低于治疗前及对照组治疗后（P＜0.05）；治疗后干预组血清CA199、CA125、CEA水平均低于治疗前及对照组治疗后（P＜0.05）；干预组药物不良反应发生率为16.67％，对照组为36.67％，干预组低于对照组（P＜0.05）；治疗后干预组QOL各维度评分高于对照组及治疗前（P＜0.05）。结论  与单纯化疗相比，免疫联合化疗治疗晚期NSCLC患者，能有效降低肿瘤标志物水平，改善患者免疫指标，减轻药物不良反应，提高患者疗效及生活质量。

       Objective  To explore the effect of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy on lymphatic immunity and quality of life of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer（NSCLC），and to provide reference for further clinical treatment．Methods  A total of 120 patients with NSCLC from June 2021 to June 2023 were selected and divided into observation group and control group evenly according to the method of drawing lots，control group was treated with chemotherapy，the observation group was treated with immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy，and the clinical efficacy and adverse drug reactions were compared between the two groups．Before and after treatment，immune function（CD3⁺ ，CD4⁺ ，CD8⁺ ），carbohydrate antigen 199（CA199），carbohydrate antigen 125（CA125），serum carcinoembryonic antigen（CEA）levels and health status questionnaire（QOL-RRB- scores）were measured．Results The total effective  rate in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group（68.33%＞41.67%，P＜0.05）．After treatment，the ratios of CD3⁺  and CD4⁺  in the observation group were significantly higher than those before treatment and control group after treatment，and the ratio of CD8⁺  was significantly lower than that before and after treatment in the control group（P＜0.05）．After treatment，the serum levels of CA199，CA125 and CEA in the observation group were lower than those before and after treatment in the control group（P＜0.05）．The incidence of adverse drug  reactions was 16.67% in the observation group and 36.67% in the control group，which was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group（P＜0.05）．After treatment，the QOL scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group and before treatment（P＜0.05）．Conclusions  Compared with chemotherapy alone，immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can effectively reduce the levels of tumor markers，improve the immune indexes of patients，reduce the adverse drug reactions，and improve the efficacy and quality of life of patients with advanced NSCLC．