目的 探讨在关节镜下膝关节前交叉韧带损伤重建术治疗的临床效果。方法 选取2018年3月—2020年3月之间我院接受住院治疗的80名膝关节前交叉韧带损伤患者作为研究对象。根据手术方式的不同,常规手术进行交叉韧带损伤的重建术治疗为常规组,关节镜下膝关节前交叉韧带损伤重建术治疗为研究组,每组各40名患者,比对两组的治疗效果。结果 通过数据得出常规组的膝功能评分(71.8±12.6)及膝功能不稳评分(13.2±1.6)要低于研究组膝功能评分(83.9±12.9)及膝功能不稳评分(19.3±2.3),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。在术后疼痛评分上研究组(3.35±0.23)各项数据均优于常规组(4.35±1.69),差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。研究组并发症发生率仅为5%,常规组并发症发生率有17.5%,研究组数据远要低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(χ^<sup>2=5.178,P=0.023)。结论 在膝关节镜下前交叉韧带损伤重建术治疗可有效改善膝关节活动性、稳定性、有效减轻患者的疼痛感,减少并发症的发生,促进膝关节功能的康复。关节镜下进行膝关节前交叉韧带损伤重建术治疗具有临床推广和采纳的价值。

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods 80 patients with ACL injury in our hospital from March 2018 to March 2020 were selected as the research objects. According to the different surgical methods, patients underwent the traditional open surgery for cruciate ligament injury reconstruction treatment were selected as the control group,patients underwent arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament injury reconstruction treatment were as the study group, 40 patients in each group, the treatment effect of the two groups were compared. Results The Lysholm score (71.8±12.6) and and Lysholm instability score (13.2±1.6) of the control group were lower than those of the study group (83.9±12.9 and 19.3±2.3), the differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). In the postoperative pain score, the study group (3.35±0.23) data was better than the control group (4.35±1.69), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The incidence of complications in the study group was only 2.5%, and that in the control group was 17.5%, which was significantly lower than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ²= 5.178, P= 0.023). Conclusion Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can effectively improve the activity and stability of knee joint, effectively reduce the pain of patients, reduce the occurrence of complications, and promote the rehabilitation of knee joint function. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has the value of clinical promotion and adoption.

目的 探讨腹腔镜下输卵管积水既往手术史对血清AMH和卵巢储备功能的影响。方法 选择2016年1月—2016年12月期间在中山市博爱医院生殖内分泌科就诊拟行体外受精—胚胎移植术患者,按照既往的输卵管积水的不同处理方式将患者分为腹腔镜下双侧输卵管切除术组(A组,n=52)、腹腔镜下双侧输卵管开窗术组(B组,n=71)、双侧输卵管阻塞或通而不畅而无积水组(C组,n=96),比较各组在促排卵首日AMH、以及AFC、FSH、LH、E2、孕酮的差异,比较各组Gn治疗时间和用量,以及注射HCG日的成熟卵泡数的差异。结果 A组的AMH、LH低于B组和C组(P<0.05),而B组和C组间AMH、LH差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组AFC水平低于C组(P<0.05),而E2水平高于C组(P<0.05)。A组的FSH高于B组和C组(P<0.05),B组和C组间FSH差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组间孕酮差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组的注射HCG日的成熟卵泡数低于B组和C组(P<0.05),而B组和C组间成熟卵泡数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组Gn用量高于B组和C组(P<0.05),而B组和C组间Gn用量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组间Gn治疗时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 通过AMH等指标检测,腹腔镜输卵管切除术会降低患者的卵巢储备功能,而开窗术则影响相对较小,对有生育要求的妇女应考虑行输卵管开窗术等方式以保护卵巢功能。