论著
目的 探讨男性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)基因分型感染情况。方法 收集采用聚合酶链式反应反向斑点杂交法进行28种HPV基因分型检测的1 137例男性检查结果,进行回顾性分析。结果 1 137例男性患者中阳性441例,阳性率为38.79%,感染率居前5位的亚型依次为HPV6(11.35%)、HPV11(7.92%)、HPV16(5.10%)、HPV52(3.52%)、HPV43(2.64%);就诊人群以20~39岁为主,感染人数也最多,各年龄组间阳性率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),≥50岁组HPV52型阳性率高于20~29岁组(P<0.05)和30~39岁组(P<0.05)。单一感染占67.35%,多重感染占32.65%,单一感染中低危型占比最多(41.27%),多重感染中,二重感染占比最多(19.50%),高低危混合感染为各种类型感染之首(15.87%)。结论 1 137例样本中HPV阳性率为38.79%,感染亚型以HPV6、HPV11、HPV16、HPV52、HPV43为主,单一低危型感染较为常见,各年龄组间阳性率相近。
Objective To investigate the genotypes of human papillomavirus(HPV)infection.Methods A total of 1 137 male patients’ diagnoses were collected and analyzed retrospectively,which came from the detections using polymerase chain reaction reverse dot blot hybridization to genotype 28 HPV.Results Among 1 137 male patients,441 were HPV positive,with a positive rate of 38.79%,the infections of top five HPV types were HPV6(11.35%),HPV11(7.92%),HPV16(5.10%),HPV52(3.52%),HPV43(2.64%).The majority of the patients were the 20-39 age group,and the number of infections was also the highest.There was no statistical significance on the difference in the positive rate among different age groups(P>0.05).The positive rate of HPV52 in ≥50 years old group was higher than the groups of aged 20~29(P<0.05)and 30~39(P<0.05).The single and multiple infections accounted for 67.35% and 32.65%.The low-risk HPV accounted for the highest proportion(41.27%)in single infections,while in patients with multiple infections,the proportion of dual infections was the largest(19.50%)and the high- and low-risk HPV mixed infections was the maximum of the infection types(15.87%).Conclusions The detection rate of positive HPV in 1 137 male patients was 38.79%,mainly were type 6,type 11,type 16,type 52 and type 43,and the single low-risk HPV infected was common.Positive rates were similar among different age groups.
论著
目的 探讨多参数磁共振成像对T1高信号间隔与非T1高信号间隔的原发性鼻腔鼻窦黑色素瘤(PSM)的鉴别价值。方法 回顾性分析经病理证实的 PSM 44例,术前均接受常规,DWI 和DCE-MRI检查。通过单因素和多因素Logistic分析评估T1高信号间隔与非T1高信号间隔PSM各MRI参数的差异。结果 44例PSMs 中,T1高信号间隔PSMs 25例,非T1高信号间隔PSMs 19例。两者在多参数MRI中,仅T2低信号间隔,ADC值、达峰时间(Tp)及最大相对增强率(MRER)在单变量分析中差异存在统计学意义(均P<0.05),在多因素Logistic分析中差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论 多参数MRI对区分T1高信号间隔与非T1高信号间隔的PSM具有一定的指导价值,但并不能作为区分两者的独立预测指标。
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of multi-parameter MRI in differential diagnosis of primary sinonasal melanoma(PSM)with high- and non-high-T1 signal septa.Methods Forty-four patients pathologically confirmed with PSMs underwent conventional,DWI and DCE-MRI examinations before operation.Univariate and multivariate Logistic analyses were used to evaluate the differences of MRI parameters between high- and non-high-T1 signal septa in PSMs.Results Among 44 PSMs,25 cases had high T1 signal septa and 19 cases had non-T1 high signal septa.In multi-parameter MRI,only T2 low signal septa,the value of ADC,peak time(TP)and maximum relative enhancement rate(MRER)were significantly different in univariate analysis(P<0.05),but not in multivariate Logistic analysis(P>0.05).Conclusions Multi-parameter MRI has some value in differentiating PSM with high-T1 and non-high-T1 signal septa,but it can not be used as an independent predictor to distinguish them.
论著
目的 分析KRAS基因突变在左半结肠、右半结肠癌分布几率的差异性。方法 回顾性分析我院病理科分子实验室2015年到2017年间接收的537例结肠癌手术标本,用ARMS-PCR法进行了KRAS基因的检测,并对左右半结肠腺癌KRAS基因突变比例进行χ2检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果 537例中有187(34.82%)例为右半结肠腺癌,左半结肠腺癌有350(65.18%)例。KRAS基因突变检测阳性例数为240例,阳性率为44.69%;右半结肠腺癌KRAS基因突变阳性数为114例,阳性率为60.96%;左半结肠癌KRAS基因突变阳性数为126例,阳性率为36.00%。双侧结肠腺癌KRAS基因突变差异有统计学意义。结论 右半结肠癌的患病例数低于左半结肠癌,右半结肠癌KRAS基因突变阳性率较左半结肠癌高,本研究为区分左右半结肠癌的分子靶向治疗提供了数据支持。
Objective To analyze the differences distribution of KRAS gene mutations in the left hemi colon cancer and right hemi colon cancer. Methods Retrospectively to analyse the 537 colorectal cancer patients who were received by our molecular laboratory of pathology from 2015 to 2017, ARMS-PCR method was used to detect the KRAS gene. The ratio of KRAS gene mutation in left and right hemi colon cancer was tested by χ2 test, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results There were 187(34.82%) patients with right hemi colon cancer; and there were 350 (65.18%)patients with left half hemi colon cancer. The KRAS positive patients were 240 cases, which were 44.69% in total. The positive patients with right hemi colon cancer were 114 cases which had a higher rate of 60.96%, the left hemi colon cancer patients were 126 cases with a lower rate of 36.00%. Conclusion The number of right hemi colon cancer was lower than the number of left hemi colon cancer. And the KRAS gene mutation in right hemi colon cancer had more positive than left hemi colon cancer. This study provides a number aid for treating right and left colon cancer in the subsequent molecular targeted drug therapy.