目的 探讨早产儿语言-社会行为情况及其影响因素,研究语言-社会行为发育与智能发育之间的关系,为早产儿保健提供指导。方法 采用自制的一般情况问卷对125例早产儿开展随访、追踪,直至2岁时,采用盖泽尔发展量表（GDS）进行语言-社会行为及智能发育评估。结果 早产儿语言发育正常43例（34.4%）,社会行为发育正常40例（32%）。早产儿语言发育商平均为（67.99±25.75）,社会行为发育商平均为（67.75±23.98）,处于发育低下水平。性别、脑出血病史、定期随访史、康复干预史、家庭干预史在语言、社会行为方面比较差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。不同胎儿期安胎史、胎龄、出生体质量在语言、社会行为方面比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;且胎儿期反复安胎,胎龄小,出生体质量低,语言及社会行为发育较差。与出生时无中-重度窒息史的患儿相比,出生时有中-重度窒息的患儿存在更多的语言发育异常,比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;但在社会行为发育方面比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。语言-社交行为发育落后的同时,早产儿的大运动、精细动作、适应性行为也存在落后,五大能区比较差异并均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 多数早产儿存在语言-社会行为发育落后,其同时可能伴有更多的运动和适应行为发育问题;语言-社交行为发育落后的患儿在胎儿期存在反复安胎且胎龄较小、出生体质量更低或有中-重度窒息史。对早产儿的语言-社会行为要及时给予关注,早期发现并早期干预,改善预后。

Objective To explore the language-social behavior of preterm infants and its influencing factors,to study the relationship between language-social behavior development and intellectual development,and to provide guidance for preterm infants' health care．Methods A self-administered general questionnaire was used to follow up 125 preterm infants until the age of 2 years,and Gesell development scale（GDS）was used to assess their language-social behavior and intellectual development．Results Preterm infants had normal language development in 43 cases（34.4%）and normal social behavioral development in 40 cases（32%）．The mean language development quotient of preterm infants was（67.99±25.75）and the mean social behavioral development quotient was（67.75±23.98）,which was at the low developmental level．There were no significant differences in gender,history of cerebral hemorrhage,regular follow-up,rehabilitation intervention,family intervention and language or social behavior（P>0.05）．Infants with different fetal age history,gestational age,and birth weight varied significantly in language and social behavior（P<0.05）;and with repeated miscarriage,small gestational age,low birth weight,showed poor language and social behavior development．Compared the children with and without moderate to severe asphyxia at birth,there was statistically significant differences in language development（P<0.05）,but in social behavior there was no significant difference（P>0.05）．The backward development of language-social behavior was accompanied by backwardness in gross motor,fine motor,and adaptive behavior in preterm infants,and the differences in the five major domains were all present and statistically significant（P<0.05）．Conclusions A major of preterm infants have poor language-social behavior development,which may be accompanied by more motor and adaptive behavior development problems;children with poor language-social behavior development have repeated miscarriage prevention at younger gestational ages,lower birth weights,or a history of moderate-to-severe asphyxia during the fetal period．It is important to give timely attention to language-social behavior in preterm infants for early detection and early intervention to improve prognosis．

目的 研究并分析优质护理对消化性溃疡患者的临床疗效以及护理满意度的影响。方法 入选2014年8月—2015年10月收治的184例消化性溃疡患者作为研究对象, 根据电脑随机数字将患者随机分为研究组和对照组,各92例。对照组男50例,女42例,年龄18～60 a,平均年龄(43.7±2.1)a,病程2～10 a,平均(5.2±0.4)a,研究组男48例,女44例,年龄20～59 a,平均(42.3±3.6)a,病程2～10 a,平均(5.2±0.4)a。患者入院后均给予消化性溃疡常规基础治疗(四联疗法),在此基础上给予对照组患者常规护理,研究组患者优质护理,对比两组患者的临床疗效和护理满意度。结果 经研究观察对比,研究组消化性溃疡患者的临床疗效明显优于对照组,研究组消化性溃疡患者的总有效率为95.65%,对照组为79.35%,两组数据对比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。研究组患者治疗后烧心、上腹痛、嗳气等症状减轻明显较对照组显著,所需时间更短,胃镜检查显示研究组患者经优质护理处理后溃疡愈合时间明显缩短,愈合明显优于对照组,上述对比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。研究组护理满意度为96.74%,对照组护理满意度仅83.69%,研究组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 优质护理能够明显缩短溃疡愈合时间,促进患者痊愈,提高消化性溃疡患者的疗效和护理满意度,值得临床推广和应用。

Objective To study and analyze the effect of high quality nursing on curative effect of patients with peptic ulcer and nursing satisfaction. Methods 98 cases of peptic ulcer patients income for treatment from August 2014 to October 2015 were selected as study subjects. The patients were randomly divided into study group and control group, 49 cases in each group. The control group included male 28 case,female 21 case,aged 18～60 years old, average age (43.7±2.1) years, disease duration of(2～10)years, average(5.2±0.4) years.Study group included male 24 cases, female 25 cases, aged 20～59 years old, average age (42.3±3.6) years, disease duration of (2～10) years, average (5.2±0.4) years. After the patient was admitted to hospital, they were treated with digestive ulcer routine treatment (quadruple therapy). On this basis,patients in the control group were given routine nursing care, the study group patients with high quality nursing, compared with the two groups of patients with clinical efficacy and nursing satisfaction. Results Study group patients with peptic ulcer clinical, curative effect was obviously superior to the control group. The study group patients with peptic ulcer, total efficiency was 95.91%, It was 79.59% in the control group, the difference between the data of two groupshad statistical significance (P<0.05). Study group nursing satisfaction was 97.96%, the control group was only81.63%. The study group was significantly higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Quality care may significantly shorten the average length of stay in patients, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion High quality nursing may significantly shorten the average length of stay in patients with peptic ulcer, improve the curative effect of peptic ulcer patients and nursing satisfaction. It is worthy of clinical popularization and application.