论著
目的 探讨特发性间质性肺炎(IIPs)[非特发性肺间质性纤维化(IPF)型]合并弥漫性肺部出血综合征患者治疗方案以及应用价值。方法 报道1例IIPs(非IPF型)合并弥漫性肺部出血综合征患者的治疗经过以及结果,结合文献分析治疗IIPs(非IPF型)合并弥漫性肺部出血综合症临床应用价值。结果 该文报道 l 例特发性肺间质肺炎(非IPF型)伴弥漫性肺泡出血综合征的老年男性患者,合并呼吸、循环衰竭,启用静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV-ECMO)抢救并成功撤机,病情好转出院。结论 IIPs作为病因以及发病机制未明、临床表现多样的一类肺间质性疾病,需临床多学科协作,及早诊断、治疗,才能成功挽救患者。
Objective To explore the treatment plan and application value of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia(non IPF)complicated with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage syndrome.Methods A case of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia(non IPF)complicated with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage syndrome was reported.The clinical application value of treatment of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia(non IPF)complicated with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage syndrome was analyzed combined with the literature.Results A case of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia(non IPF type)with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage syndrome was reported in this paper. Combined with respiratory and circulatory failure,veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used to rescue and successfully wean,and the condition improved and discharged.Conclusions Through the curative effect evaluation of this patient,it is believed that idiopathic interstitial pneumonia,as a kind of pulmonary interstitial disease with unknown etiology and pathogenesis and diverse clinical manifestations,need clinical multidisciplinary cooperation,early diagnosis and treatment,in order to successfully save the patient.
论著
目的 探讨噻托溴铵喷雾剂(能倍乐)对合并有前列腺肥大(BPH)的慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的影响。方法 2017年9月—2019年9月在我院呼吸与危重症医学科的AECOPD的男性患者167例,年龄51~96岁,平均(74.26±7.6)岁。分别为AECOPD组、AECOPD+噻托溴铵喷雾剂治疗组。比较AECOPD合并BPH与能倍乐的关系。结果 AECOPD患者合并有BPH的45人(52.94%),能倍乐治疗合并有BPH的AECOPD患者48人(58.53%),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。其中,AECOPD患者合并有BPH患者中有10人(11.76%)出现尿频、夜尿多;尿潴留的4人(4.7%);同时口服哈乐和保列治的16人(18.82%);要置尿管导尿的5人(5.8%)。能倍乐治疗AECOPD患者合并有BPH患者中有7人(8.53%)出现尿频、夜尿多;尿潴留的1人(1.21%);同时口服哈乐和保列治的20人(24.39%);要置尿管导尿的3人(3.6%),比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 能倍乐不增加合并BPH的COPD患者的急性加重;也不增加治疗BPH的药物使用。能倍乐对于稳定期合并BPH的COPD患者治疗是安全的。
Objective To investigate the effect of Spiriva Respimat on acute exacerbation of COPD with benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH). Methods The 167 patients who were hospitalized for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)(aged 51~96 years) with an average age of (74.26±7.6) years and the 82 patients treated with Spiriva Respimat in the department of respiratory and critical care medicine of our hospital from September 2017 to September 2019 were reviewed. In our pilot study, 48 AECOPD patients with BPH patients were enrolled as the treatment group and another 45 similar cases as the control group. In the former group Spiriva Respimat was administered and the control group was not. Results There were 45 patients (52.94%) with BPH in AECOPD group and 48 patients (58.53%) with BPH in Spiriva Respimat group. There was no statistical significance between the two groups (P>0.05). Among them, 10 patients (11.76%) with AECOPD and BPH had frequent urination and night urination, 4 patients (4.7%) of urinary retention, 16 patients (18.82%) who had oral Harnal and Finasteride, 5 patients (5.8%) need catheterization. In the AECOPD patients with BPH treated with Spiriva Respimat, 7 patients (8.53%) had frequent urination and night urination, 1 patient (1.21%) had urinary retention, 20 patients (24.39%) had oral Harnal and Finasteride, and 3 patients (3.6%) were managed through catheterization (P>0.05). Conclusion Spiriva Respimat does not increase the acute exacerbation of COPD patients with BPH, nor does it increase the use of drugs to treat BPH. It is safe to treat COPD patients with BPH in stable stage.
论著
目的 分析毕节地区新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)肺炎(novel coronavirus pneumonia,NCP)胸部CT影像学表现,探讨对NCP的临床诊断的价值。方法 回顾性分析毕节市第三人民医院2020年1月14日至2月18日收治的13例NCP患者的流行病学特征及胸部CT影像学特征。结果 13例患者中2例为长期居住在武汉来毕;1例由从上海到湖北宜昌逗留3天返毕;1例直接与武汉当地人接触;3例为与确诊病人的密切接触者;5例是聚集性发病,均与从浙江省台州市返毕确诊病人密切接触;1例无流行病学史。胸部CT影像学以双肺或一侧肺散在斑片状、磨玻璃状高密度影,密度不均,边界不清,肺野外带显著为特征。重型患者短期内肺部CT影像学变化明显。结论 确诊NCP普通型患者胸部CT影像学大多以典型表现为特征;重型NCP患者短时间内可出现实变及肺纤维化。
Objective To analyze the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP) chest CT imaging findings in Bijie area, and to explore the clinical diagnostic value of NCP. Methods The epidemiological characteristics and chest CT features of 13 NCP patients admitted to The Third People's Hospital of Bijie from January 14 to February 18, 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Results Among the 13 patients, 2 lived in Wuhan for a long time, 1 stayed for 3 days from Shanghai to Yichang, Hubei, and returned home; 1 directly contacted with the local people in Wuhan; 3 closely contacted with the confirmed patients; 5 were clustered diseases, all closely contacted with the confirmed patients returning from Taizhou, Zhejiang province; 1 had no epidemiological history. CT imaging of the chest is characterized by patchy, ground glass high-density shadows scattered in two or one side of the lung, with uneven density, unclear boundary and significant lung field zone. Conclusion Most of the chest CT images of the patients with NCP were characterized by typical manifestations, while consolidation and pulmonary fibrosis were found in the patients with severe NCP in a short period of time.
论著
目的 探讨及比较CURB-65、PSI、SMART-COP及APACHEⅡ 4种临床评分对重症社区获得性肺炎(SCAP)患者的早期诊断价值。方法 采用前瞻性研究方法,收集2011年10月—2014年2月广州市第一人民医院呼吸内科收治的67例SCAP及同期33例普通CAP患者的临床资料,记录入组后24小时内CURB-65、PSI、SMART-COP及APACHEⅡ评分的最差值,比较4种临床评分系统对SCAP的早期诊断价值。结果 SCAP组CURB-65、PSI、SMART-COP及APACHEⅡ评分均高于普通CAP组患者[CURB-65(分):3.06±1.10 比0.85±0.79,P<0.001;PSI(分):144.93±36.48比73.94±27.17,P<0.001; SMART-COP(分):6.54±1.41比 1.67±1.02,P<0.001; APACHEⅡ(分):20.79±5.69比7.94±3.87,P<0.001]。CURB-65≥3分、PSI≥130分、SMART-COP≥3分及APACHEⅡ≥15分诊断SCAP的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)分别为0.940[95% CI:0.89~0.98, P<0.001],0.933[95%CI:0.88~0.97,P<0.001],0.999[95%CI:0.99~1.0,P<0.001],0.976[95%CI:0.95~0.99,P<0.001],敏感度分别为65.6%、71.6%、100%、88.1%,特异度分别为100%、100%、78.7%、93.9%。结论 CURB-65及PSI评分特异度好,但敏感度低,易漏诊,SMART-COP和APACHE Ⅱ评分诊断效能更佳。
Objective To evaluate and compare the early diagnosis value of CURB-65,PSI,SMART-COP and APACHEⅡin patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. Methods This was a prospective study conducted in department of respiratory in Guangzhou First People's Hospital. We included 67 SCAP patients and 33 CAP patients between October of 2011and February of 2014. The lowest scores within 24 hours of CURB-65 score,PSI score,SMART-COP score,APACHE Ⅱ score,respectively,for each patients were recorded. Prediction of SCAP as made in four scoring systems was compared. Results CURB-65 score,PSI score,SMART-COP score,APACHE Ⅱ score were higher in SCAP as compared with that of CAP(CURB-65:3.0±1.1 vs 0.9±0.8,P<0.001;PSI:144.6±36.4 vs 73.9±27.1,P<0.001; SMART-COP:6.5±1.4 vs 1.6±1.0,P<0.001; APACHEⅡ:20.6±5.6 vs 7.9±3.8,P<0.001). ROC curve for CURB-65 score≥ 3 scores,PSI score≥ 130 scores,SMART-COP score≥3 scores and APACHE Ⅱ score ≥ 15 scores in the early diagnosis SCAP were 0.940[95%CI:0.89~0.98,P<0.001],0.933[95%CI:0.88~0.97,P<0.001],0.999[95%CI:0.99~1.0,P<0.001],0.976[95%CI:0.95~0.99,P<0.001]. Sensitivity of four kinds of scoring system was 65.6%,71.6%,100%,88.1%, with specificity of 100%,100%,78.7%,93.9% respectively. Conclusion The specificity of diagnosis was better in the CURB-65 and PSI score,but the sensitivity was low and easy to miss diagnosis. SMART-COP and APACHEⅡscore systems had a better diagnostic value on SCAP.
论著
目的 探讨传统支气管针吸活检 (cTBNA )与超声支气管镜引导下针吸活检(EBUS-TBNA)对于肺部疾病伴有肺门及纵膈淋巴结肿大患者的诊断价值。方法 2012 年8月—2014年6月对在我院行CT检查提示肺部伴有肺门和/或纵膈淋巴结病变的患者38例, 分别利用cTBNA或EBUS-TBNA检查对肿大的淋巴结行TBNA,对所获得的标本进行相应的细胞学检查。结果 38例病例均经组织病理学诊断后确诊,并经过6个月的随访,其中cTBNA组(n=19)经组织病理明确诊断的包括:1例结核,5例小细胞肺癌,6例腺癌,3例鳞癌,1例大细胞癌,3例慢性炎症,cTBNA细胞学诊断阳性诊断率为63.16%(12/19),cTBNA组细胞学诊断肺癌的敏感度为66.67%(10/15),特异度为100%。EBUS-TBNA组(n=19)组织病理学诊断明确的1例为肺结核,1例为纵隔恶性肿瘤,1例为结节病,1例大细胞癌,1例小细胞癌,7例腺癌,5例鳞癌,2例为慢性炎症,EBUS-TBNA细胞学阳性诊断率为78.94%(15/19)。两种方法在诊断肺门及纵膈淋巴结肿大的疾病中有差异(P<0.05)。EBUS-TBNA组细胞学诊断肺癌的敏感度为86.67%(13/15),特异度为100%。结论 EBUS-TBNA细胞学检查对肺部疾病伴有肺门及纵膈淋巴结肿大的诊断率较cTBNA高,可明显提高检查阳性率,具有重要临床意义。
Objective To evaluate the value of clinical application between cTBNA and EBUS-TBNA in diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Methods Between August 2012 and June 2014, 38 in-patients with mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes took conventional transbronchial needle aspiration( cTBNA,n=19) or endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration(EBUS-TBNA, n=19), and we were comparing the diagnostic results of two methods. Results 19 patients in the cTBNA group were diagnosed by forceps biopsy,including 1 case of lung cancer and 162 cases of tuberculosis, 5 cases of small cell lung cancer, 6 cases of adenocarcinoma, 3 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 1 case of large cell carcinoma, 3 cases of chronic inflammation, a cytological diagnosis of TBNA positive in 12 cases (63.16%). In the EBUS-TBNA group (n=19), the patients were diagnosed by accepting forceps biopsy, 1 case of tuberculosis, 1 case of mediastinal malignant tumor, 1 cases of sarcoidosis, 1 cases of large cell carcinoma, 1 case of small cell carcinoma, 7 cases of adenocarcinoma, 5 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 2 cases of chronic inflammation, EBUS-TBNA cytology positive rate of diagnosis was 14 (73.68%). Two techniques in the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes have statistically significant(P<0.05). The sensitinty of cytology in the diagnosis of lung caner was 86.67%(13/15),and the specificity was 100%(EBUS-TBNA). Conclusion EBUS-TBNA is an effective tool in the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes and superior to cTBNA.