目的 探讨高血压性脑出血在不同时点给药丹参酮ⅡA磺酸钠的疗效分析及对神经保护作用。方法 选取我院2014年10月—2016年10月期间收治的66例高血压性脑出血患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表的方法分为观察组(n=33)和对照组(n=33),对照组患者于入院后第10天采用丹参酮ⅡA磺酸钠进行治疗,观察组则于入院后第3天采用丹参酮ⅡA磺酸钠进行治疗,分别对2组患者的临床疗效、不良反应、治疗前后的神经功能以及随访一年的脑卒中影响量表(SIS)进行客观比较。结果 经比较,观察组患者的临床总有效率为90.90%,对照组的临床总有效率为69.70%,2组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的不良反应稍低于对照组,但2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);此外,观察组患者治疗后的神经功能评分优于对照组和治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在随访一年的时间里发现,观察组患者的SIS量表亦更优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 早期采用药丹参酮ⅡA磺酸钠治疗高血压性脑出血的临床疗效显著,不良反应相对较小,且在一定程度上发挥了保护患者神经功能的作用,值得推广。

Objective: To investigate the effect of tanshinone II A sulfonate treatment on hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage at different time and the neuroprotective effect. Methods: In our hospital from October 2014 to October 2016 66 cases of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients were enrolled as the research object, according to the random number table method divided into observation group (n=33) and control group (n=33), patients in the control group on the tenth day after admission of sodium tanshinone A sulfonate treatment, The observation group was treated with tanshinone A sodium sulfonate on the third day after admission. The clinical efficacy, adverse reactions, neurological function before and after treatment, and Stroke Scale (SIS) were compared between the two groups. Results: by comparison, the observation group of patients with clinical total efficiency 90.90%, clinical control group in the total efficiency 69.70%, compared with significant difference (P<0.05); to observe the adverse reaction of patients was slightly lower than that of control group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05); in addition, the patients in the observation group the neurological score was significantly better than the control group and before treatment, the difference was significant (P<0.05); Conclusion: the early treatment of sodium tanshinone II A sulfonate in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage has a significant clinical effect, a relatively small adverse reaction, and to a certain extent, it plays a protective role in patients with neurological function, and is worthy of promotion.

目的 对比纤维支气管镜肺灌洗治疗和常规治疗重症肺部感染患者的临床疗效。方法 将2015年5月—2017年4月间在我院接受治疗的92例重症肺部感染患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表分为实验组(n=46)和对照组(n=46),其中对照组采用常规对症治疗,实验组加以实施纤维支气管镜肺灌洗治,治疗后,纤支镜气道灌洗检测两组患者的血气分析指标变化,采用ELISA测定血清炎症因子含量,及放射免疫法测定血清应激激素含量。结果 经比较,实验组患者治疗后的PaO₂、SaO₂、PaCO₂高于对照组患者(P<0.05);实验组患者的血清炎症因子hs-CRP、IL-6、IL-8水平低于对照组患者(P<0.05);此外,实验组患者的Ang-II、NE、Cor含量低于对照组患者(P<0.05)。结论 纤支镜气道灌洗可有助于改善重症肺部感染患者的肺通气功能,降低全身炎症应激程度,促进疾病康复。

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of bronchoalveolar lavage and conventional treatment in patients with severe pulmonary infection. Methods 92 patients with severe pulmonary infection treated in our hospital from May 2015 to April 2017 were selected as research objects. They were randomly divided into experimental group (n=46) and control group (n=46). The control group was treated with conventional symptomatic treatment, The experimental group implemented bronchoscopy lung lavage treatment. After treatment, blood gas bronchoscopic airway lavage in two groups were detected with analysis indexes. Serum inflammatory factors were determined by ELISA, and the serum levels of stress hormones were determined by radioimmunoassay. Results After the treatment, the PaO₂, SaO₂ and PaCO₂ in the experimental group were higher than those in the controlgroup(P<0.05). The levels of serum inflammatory factors hs-CRP, IL-6、IL-8 in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05); in addition, the levels of Ang-II, NE and Cor in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Bronchoscopy airway lavage may help to improve the pulmonary ventilation function of patients with severe pulmonary infection, reduce the degree of systemic inflammatory stress, and promote disease recovery.

目的 探讨重症急性胰腺炎诊治特点。方法 回顾性分析13例重症急性胰腺炎患者临床资料,包括一般资料、生化检测及影像资料、治疗措施与预后结果,纳入标准为急性胰腺炎合并器官衰竭＞48 h(改良Marshall评分≥2分)。结果 重症急性胰腺炎患者一般资料中普遍突出存在心率增快(121.07±28.09)次/分、APACHE II评分偏高(18.92±7.34),病因排序则是高脂血症(38.5%)＞胆石症(30.8%)＞酒精性(23.1%),SAP合并ARDS发生率可达46.2%,合并AKI则高达69.2%;WBC(12.60±5.57)×10⁹/L、CRP(138.16±67.06)mg/L及PCT(15.76±27.33)ng/L等炎症指标升高提示SAP普遍存在炎症反应,影像学中69.2%患者合并发生肺炎及腹腔积液则提示多处感染部位,其他脏器指标异常升高也提示SAP患者心肺肝肾均存在不同程度的受损;接受CRRT治疗及呼吸支持可分别达46.2%及76.9%,7天内死亡例数为1例(7.7%),28天内死亡例数为4例(30.8%),ICU及总住院时间为(10.77±7.38)及(19.61±13.40)天。结论 重症急性胰腺炎是全身及局部性的炎症反应累及全身各个脏器的急性复杂病变,以合并发生ARDS及AKI为临床特征,需要多器官功能保护与替代、外科干预等多学科综合协作治疗。

Objective To evaluate characteristics of diagnosis and treatment on severe acute pancreatitis. Methods To respective analysis clinical data of 13 patients with severe acute pancreatitis. The data included baseline characteristics, biochemical tests and imaging data, treatment and prognosis, inclusion criteria for acute pancreatitis with organ failure > 48 h (modified Marshall score > 2). Results Higher heart rate(121.07±28.09) times/min and APACHEII scores(18.92±7.34) were universally found in SAP, which primary disease contained hyperlipidemia (38.5%) > cholelith disease (30.8%) > alcohol (23.1%) with incidence of ARDS and AKI being 46.2% and 69.2%; Higher inflammatory biomarkers including WBC(12.60±5.57)×10⁹/L, CRP(138.16±67.06)mg/L and PCT(15.76±27.33)ng/L indicated widespread inflammation with many infection sites revealing by 69.2% pneumonia and peritoneal effusion on imaging; Other abnormally biochemical index prompted some injury of viscera including heart, lungs, kidney and liver; 1 case suffered death within 7 days and 4 cases also did within 28 days, ICU and total length of hospital stay was (10.77±7.38) and (19.61±13.40) days, CRRT treatment and respiratory support respectively reached 46.2% and 46.2%. Conclusion Severe acute pancreatitis is a acute complex pathological changes on various organs induced by acute systemic and local inflammation with feature of mergence with the ARDS and AKI, which need the multidisciplinary integrated collaborative treatment on organ function protection and sustain and surgical intervention.

目的 观察有创-无创序贯通气治疗慢性阻塞性疾病(COPD)急性加重并呼吸衰竭的疗效。方法 选取2013年3月—2015年3月在兴宁市人民医院呼吸科收治的COPD急性加重并II型呼吸衰竭、需行机械通气的患者80例,随机进行有创-无创序贯通气治疗组A和单一有创通气治疗组B,两组除了机械通气的方式不同之外,其他的常规治疗均相同,主要观察两组患者进行相关机械通气方式前后的呼吸、循环及血气指标的变化情况以及进行机械通气的总时间和住院时间及呼吸机相关肺炎(VAP)的发生例数。结果 治疗组患者的血气、呼吸及循环内的各项生化指标改善程度均与对照组无统计学意义(P>0.05),同时治疗组患者的VAP的发生率,总的住院时间,进行机械通气的总时间少于对照组患者,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 采用有创-无创序贯通气治疗慢性阻塞性疾病(COPD)急性加重并呼吸衰竭综合治疗效果要好于采用单一有创通气治疗,值得临床推广应用。